[E. Pluribus Unum]

An Article V Convention of States is not a constitutional convention.

[A CA Guy]

Amen.

[make no mistake]

I think Gov. Abbott is brilliant. I hope he continues his political influence even after his governorship.

[SWAMP-C1PHER]

I hope this happens soon. As in under 10 years.

[Ben Hecks]

Earlier thread with comments:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3381366/posts

[Ghost of Philip Marlowe]

This is very big and may realistically be the last chance we have of saving our republic.

My FRiends, it is critical that we understand this concept that our brilliant Founding Fathers provided for us to escape the Leviathan State.

It is critical that we be very highly educated on it so that we can explain why it is good, why it is not a “constitutional convention” (which we must never, EVER allow), and that it will ultimately free the states from federal tyranny.

Get Mark Levin’s, “The Liberty Amendments” and study it in depth.

[Publius]

Article V ping. The fifth time this information had been posted.

[Nextrush]

Talk is cheap even if sounds sweet and syrupy.

I distrust 95 percent of Republicans who in the end are Establishment flunkies who will never get my vote.

I perceive Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who endorses Ted Cruz for President, as the more conservative leader in TX.

Who will Gov. Abbott endorse for President ahead of the primary in March?

[JoeFromSidney]

If they won't obey the Constitution we have now, why should we expect them to obey an amended one? James Madison was right to call the Constitution a "parchment barrier." Ultimately we the people need to enforce it.

Basically, the Constitution is an agreement between the public and the Feds. We agree to obey any laws passed in accordance with it, and they agree not to pass any laws not in accordance with it.

clearly that agreement has been breached by the Feds. If they're not bound by it, we're not either.