Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian rocket passes within 1,500 yards of US aircraft carrier
FoxNews ^ | 12/30/15 | Unknown

Posted on 12/30/2015 11:17:42 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Blood of Tyrants
Since the missiles were fired away from the fleet, that was not as provocative as it could have been. Still the Navy could have done more.

The Phalanx close in weapons system's should have had their radar up and 20mm cannons spinning with 23 minutes advance warning.

Since the Iranian missiles were 1,500 yards away and since the Phalanx has an effective range of about 4,000 yards, the Navy could have shredded the missiles in mid-flight.

That would have impressed the Republican Guard and probably made them wet their pants. It would have put a stop to this nonsense in a way the Big Zero just doesn't understand.

21 posted on 12/30/2015 1:23:18 PM PST by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357

See post #5.

The U.S. ships were in the middle of the Straight. The Iranian ships were East of the U.S. ships. The Iranian ships launched the missiles East towards Iran, directly away from the U.S. ships.

U.S. ships -—> Iranian ships -—> Iranian missiles headed away.

If you shot the Phalanx guns at the Iranian missiles, the rounds would travel through the Iranian ships and then have to catch up to the departing missiles.

Do y’all understand what being on the back side of a launch looks like instead of being on the same side of a ship as it launches missiles??

Because Fox News sure doesn’t...unless you think that they crafted that news headline to jerk the chains of people who don’t think about the news before they react.

Those Iranian ships were 1,500 yards away from the closest U.S. ship. If the ship was 20 yards wide, then the closest those missiles ever were to the U.S. ships was 1,520 yards away.

Since they were launched from the far side of the Iranian ships headed directly away from the U.S. ships, the missiles forever got farther away from our U.S. ships as they flew.


22 posted on 12/30/2015 1:37:07 PM PST by Southack (The one thing preppers need from the 1st World? http://tinyurl.com/ktfwljc .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Perhaps we need to test some of our new laser or rail gun weapons in close proximity to Iranian patrol boats.


23 posted on 12/30/2015 1:39:07 PM PST by The Great RJ (�Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money.� Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

No CIWS target practice?


24 posted on 12/30/2015 1:50:05 PM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
From Real Clear Politics, Sept 10, 2015...

"In a 2014 New Yorker interview, Obama said his goal was to create a 'new equilibrium' in the Middle East.

In the short run, at least, his signature diplomatic undertaking can be counted on to bring more violence to this volatile region.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the [Obama-Putin Iran deal] agreement is formally known, provides the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism an infusion of somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 billion of unfrozen assets and a great deal more of continuing revenues as businesses and governments around the world rush to profit from oil-and-gas-rich Iran's reintegration into the world economy.

The agreement relaxes the international isolation of the Islamic Republic and ratifies Tehran's status as a nuclear threshold state. And it relieves restrictions on Iran's acquisition of weapons, including ballistic missiles. ..."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/10/iran_deal_throws_sparks_on_mideast_tinderbox_128034.html
__________________________________________________________

Aug 2015...

Image and video hosting by TinyPic


__________________________________________________________

Russian build-up in Syria part of secret deal with Iran's Quds Force leader

September 11, 2015
Jennifer Griffin, Lucas Tomlinson
FoxNews.com

As the Pentagon warily eyes a Russian military build-up in Syria, Western intelligence sources tell Fox News that the escalated Russian presence began just days after a secret Moscow meeting in late July between Iran's Quds Force commander - their chief exporter of terror - and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Fox News has learned Quds head Qassem Soleimani and Putin discussed such a joint military plan for Syria at that meeting, an encounter first reported by Fox News in early August. ..."

The Quds Force is the international arm of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, involved in exporting terrorism to Iran's proxies throughout the Middle East including Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. ..."

Officials who have monitored the build-up say they've seen more than 1,000 Russian combatants - some of them from the same plainclothes Special Forces units who were sent to Crimea and Ukraine. Some of these Russian troops are logistical specialists and needed for security at the expanding Russian bases.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/11/russian-build-up-in-syria-part-secret-deal-with-irans-quds-force-leader/
__________________________________________________________

Pro-Hezbollah Paper: Russia, Iran, Syria, Hezbollah Form Alliance

Sept 23, 2015

A prominent pro-Hezbollah newspaper in Lebanon reported Tuesday that Russia and the terrorist organization have formed an alliance and will fight together in Syria. "The parties to the alliance are the states of Russia, Iran, Syria, and Iraq, with Lebanon's Hezbollah as the fifth party,"

Al-Akhbar Editor in Chief Ibrahim al-Amin wrote. The pact would be called the "4+1 alliance", a pun based on the P5+1 that negotiated the nuclear deal with Iran. Hezbollah is a proxy of Iran based in Lebanon and Moscow has been working with Tehran to save Bashar al-Assad's regime, even sending men and weapons to Syria.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2015/09/22/report-russia-partners-with-hezbollah.html
__________________________________________________________

 photo Putin and Iran 01_zpsu2woec4n.jpg

25 posted on 12/30/2015 2:12:16 PM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Pfft...Obama would be afraid to attack a pirate ship.


26 posted on 12/30/2015 2:18:10 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

I appreciate those comments. Certainly puts a different light on it.


27 posted on 12/30/2015 4:13:36 PM PST by DoughtyOne ((It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Whether they were shooting away or not isn't the point so much as the fact that they wouldn't have dared do anything so provocative if we had a real leader in the Whitehouse. I'm sure that had Regan or maybe even Bush been in office,we would have done some test firing of our own.
28 posted on 12/30/2015 5:16:05 PM PST by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; Larry Lucido; KC_Lion; FredZarguna; PROCON

High Tea with a Mr. Newman.

Business as usual at Kramerica Industries.

A single man in a messy apartment which may or may not contain a chicken.

And with Darren’s help, we’ll get that chicken!


29 posted on 12/30/2015 7:14:04 PM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Southack
This does not matter. This is still the Iranians telling the US to fling off. They are building ICBMs and nuclear warheads while Ovomit and Curry smile...
30 posted on 12/30/2015 11:37:09 PM PST by Netz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Wait ‘til there’s a real President at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue before any talk of war.


31 posted on 12/31/2015 5:02:38 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Southack
I do understand. Graphics not needed. Do you understand that unless the missiles were fired at an incredibly low angle that they would rise about the Iranian ships and be spotted by the radar that controls those guns (well above the Iranian ships) and so they could have been shot out of the air. Yes live fire over ones head can be terrifying, but might be a valuable lesson for the Republican Guard.
32 posted on 12/31/2015 5:40:16 PM PST by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

I think Kerry needs to reduce his face pressure.


33 posted on 12/31/2015 8:03:39 PM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bgill

They set us up the bomb.


34 posted on 12/31/2015 8:04:17 PM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson