Posted on 12/27/2015 4:05:50 PM PST by VinL
Ted Cruz has assembled an impressive presidential campaign structure in Iowa, veteran political observers here say, with one going so far as to describe Cruz’s campaign as perhaps "the most sophisticated" the first in the nation caucus state has ever witnessed.
Because of that grass roots organization, Cruz is primed to maintain his recent surge in the polls and win the Iowa Republican caucuses in five weeks, those observers say.
Cruz, the Tea Party firebrand and first term U.S. Sen. from Texas, was the first Republican candidate to enter the presidential race, on March 23. Nine months later, he has overtaken longtime front-runner Donald Trump in several polls published recently in Iowa, including a 10 percentage-point lead in the highly regarded Iowa Poll.
In Iowa, Cruz has appealed to the state's abundance of evangelical Republicans and attempted to tap into the anti establishment sentiment that pervades Republican voters this year.
Cruz's success also stems from a massive and innovative campaign structure, according to Iowa campaign veterans.
Cruz "has probably put together one of the most sophisticated, if not the most sophisticated, organizational efforts this state has ever seen," said Dave Nagle, a three term Democratic member of Congress and now a lawyer in Waterloo.
Doug Gross, who led Mitt Romney’s 2008 presidential campaign in Iowa and has served on numerous other campaigns, called Cruz's the best campaign operation among the 2016 candidates.
"Frankly it's a textbook operation how to win a caucus campaign," Gross said.
Volunteers
Cruz started his Iowa campaign by solidifying support among Tea Party voters, the bloc that launched his election to the U.S. Senate in 2010, according to Catherine Frazier, the national press secretary for Cruz’s campaign. Then, Frazier said, Cruz courted evangelical voters, libertarians and even moderates.
Cruz's campaign has a chairperson in each of the state’s 99 counties many with several co chairs — more than 2,000 volunteers, and a network of pastors advocating for Cruz, according to Frazier.
The campaign conducted an effective voter targeting effort among various ideologies within the Republican Party and waited to pick off voters who in recent weeks have peeled off from supporting Trump and Ben Carson, said Nagle and Gross.
"What (Cruz) planned is working precisely to his desires," Gross said.
John Stineman, who led Steve Forbes's presidential campaign in Iowa in 2000 and has worked 14 years as a consultant, described Cruz’s campaign as similar to the data-driven, history making effort Barack Obama employed here in 2008 and 2012.
"It's a very elaborate, very aggressive, very well informed grass roots swarming strategy," Stineman said.
Cruz also has won the endorsement primary in Iowa. With the state’s top elected Republicans U.S. Sens. Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst and Gov. Terry Branstad pledging to stay out of the endorsement game, Cruz's scored a trifecta with endorsements from staunch conservative U.S. Rep. Steve King, social conservative leader Bob Vander Plaats and conservative radio host Steve Deace.
"One thing that's incredible is that this started off as a race with everyone looking at Sen. Cruz as a Tea Party candidate," Frazier said. "And here we are today.. he is viewed as not only a Tea Party candidate but an evangelical candidate. And that's incredibly important in Iowa."
The efforts appear to be paying off.
Cruz's polling average in Iowa on Nov. 1, as calculated by Real Clear Politics, still was in the single digits at 9.6 percent, fourth best in the expansive Republican field.
That polling average in the past two months has more than tripled to 30.2 percent, which leads all Republicans.
While other Republican candidates have surged to the top of the GOP field and then faltered — think Scott Walker and Carson ,, observers in Iowa said they think Cruz is better positioned to remain strong in the race through the Feb. 1 caucuses.
'I'd be shocked if he doesn't win going away," Gross said of Cruz. "He built his organization, then he developed his narrative, and that organization captured the narrative, while others are still trying to build a narrative. And it’s too late to build a narrative."
Cruz could get "Huckabee type numbers," Stineman said, referring to Mike Huckabee’s then record setting 2008 victory in the Iowa caucuses. Stineman said Cruz appears to be solidifying a healthy percentage of the state’s most conservative voters, while several candidates, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie and John Kasich, for example, all appear to be competing for more moderate Republican voters.
"Failure for one of those folks to really take off and get Romney like numbers, I think that's to Cruz's benefit," Stineman said. "It points to why he's not only in the lead, but why he's, I think, at this point favored to win."
Cruz, however, cannot spend the next five weeks coasting to a victory in Iowa, observers cautioned.
That which so many Republican voters like about Cruz, his willingness to rankle even his Republican colleagues in the U.S. Senate, also upsets some Republicans, Stineman noted.
And Nagle said there exists the threat that Cruz is peaking too early. Now that Cruz is battling for the top spot in the polls, the focus from media and voters will intensify, Nagle said.
"I used to be widely quoted with the 'Nagle’s three rules for success in the Iowa caucus.' Rule No. 1 is organize, rule No. 2 is organize, and rule No. 3 is get hot at the end," Nagle said. "If (Cruz) has any danger right now, it's he's gotten hot too early. He'd be much better to be peaking in the second or third week of January."
And yet Nagle thinks, thanks in large part to that campaign organization that has helped solidify conservative voters, Cruz is in position to sustain his recent polling numbers and be competitive on caucus night Feb. 1 and even after the presidential primary process leaves Iowa.
"He's in prime position to do very well here," Nagle said. "And I also think he’s in prime position to do very well on Super Tuesday.
"He's the real deal."
That was before Trump entered the race. Once Trump, with his already huge social media presence, got in there was no way a first term senator without that name recogition could possibly compete. Cruz is wisely sticking to retail politics, something he has a lot more experience with than Trump.
It will be interesting to see if Trump has been quietly laying the groundwork to win the caucus and surprises everyone. His ability to bring out new voters, supposedly his secret weapon to pull of a win in Iowa, will face its first real test.
I'll be as shocked as anyone if Trump can beat Cruz there. I suspect Trump's brash New York City personality will turn a lot of people off, but that's just a guess.
Trump has good people around him also, people who have won in Iowa. I think the timing is actually pretty good with Cruz ahead, as it my vitalize the Trump people not to be complacent.
I’m going to do something today, that I’ve never done in my life. I’m going to contact the local Trump campaign and volunteer. I suspect it’s in Atlanta and not down south to TRoup County yet.
Bookmarking for February.
Cruz “has probably put together one of the most sophisticated, if not the most sophisticated, organizational efforts this state has ever seen,” said Dave Nagle, a three term Democratic member of Congress and now a lawyer in Waterloo.
Democratic member of Congress? Say what???????
I fully expect some bad things happening in this country and the world that will set Trump apart from the pack.
Cruz is a good man, but not strong enough. I won’t vote for him in a primary. I won’t even turn on the tube to listen to him at this point.
He’s an apprentice.
“...He bought copies of the book written by Obama’s campaign manager, passed them out to his staff, and said they were going to use everything that worked and throw away what didn’t...”
Since 0bama was elected *twice*, it would probably not be unwise to give it a look-see.
Agreed. Obama can be (should be) despised, but it's a fact that he ran a hugely successful campaign.
Hard to hold a rally in a stadium with 200 people. The cameras would show that for sure.
Iowa I hear is more like an evangelical primary. Nice to get, but the Republicans went on to win only once or twice from there since the eighties.
You mean going with the RINO instead of the Iowa choice resulted in the GOP getting humiliated by no-name Dems.
No, I mean winning Iowa is more a winning factor to Democrats than Republicans. Lots of Democrats who won there went on to win recently, not Republibans.
Except for the last *successful* GOP candidate, who began his campaign by winning Iowa.
Yes that one since the what, 80s?
The GOP should start with a solid GOP state that has a closed GOP primary, like Oklahoma. That should be a winning recipe. Lessee, who did they pick in 2008 and 2012?
They should close all states to registered party voters in the primary to avoid people voting to disrupt rather than pick the best Republican candidate.
How many delegates does that get him?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.