Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz won’t attack Trump, but why won’t Trump attack Cruz?
Hotair ^ | 12/11/2015 | AllahPundit

Posted on 12/11/2015 1:23:38 PM PST by SeekAndFind

A thought inspired by this morning’s skirmish. Everyone understands why Cruz is laying off Trump. Cruz wants his voters and he’s afraid that if he attacks, those voters will turn on him viciously. It’s painful to watch a guy who built his career as a fearless warrior against RINOs fawning over the biggest RINO in the race out of naked self-interest, but you can’t fault his strategy. Trump doesn’t just have a base, he has a cult of personality. Attack him and they’re apt to treat you as an outright enemy. You tread lightly around a man like that when you want something from his supporters.

That calculus doesn’t apply to Trump, though. Cruz has lots of fans, some very devoted and some less so, but he doesn’t have a cult of personality like Trump does. That’s because, I think, Cruz’s personality isn’t much of an asset to him. (It may be a liability.) Cruz fans like him because he really is a dogmatic conservative who’s on the right side of nearly every issue. Their loyalty is to the cause more so than to the man. Not so for Trumpers. Which means, if he wanted to, Trump could unload on Cruz without alienating the entirety of Cruz fans the way Trump fans would be universally alienated if Cruz went after Trump. Some Cruz fans would hold a grudge; if Cruz started to slip in the polls because of the attacks, many of them would opt for Marco Rubio over Trump on the theory that Rubio is a good conservative on most issues. But some Cruz fans, I think, would shift to Trump for a reason articulated by Cruz himself this morning:

The Establishment's only hope: Trump & me in a cage match. Sorry to disappoint — @realDonaldTrump is terrific. #DealWithIt

— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) December 11, 2015

Not a word about conservatism there, just “the Establishment.” Some Cruz fans probably prefer him to Trump because they’d rather nominate a populist who’s conservative, because they respect Cruz as a man of faith, because they like Cruz’s polished speaking style more than Trump’s, etc. But those people aren’t “Cruz or bust” voters. Primarily, as Cruz said, they’re against “the Establishment.” And if Trump could prove to them that he’d be better at bringing down the Establishment than Cruz would, some would shift to him. To put it another way, what Cruz fans and Trump fans all have in common is that they’re populists. Some Cruz fans are more populist than they are conservative. Those people are gettable by Trump. So why isn’t he trying to get them?

One possibility is that Trump is playing the same sort of game Cruz is. Why risk alienating another candidate’s supporters by attacking before you absolutely have to? But Trump has never followed that logic. He ripped Jeb Bush apart, went after Rubio as a “lightweight,” attacked Ben Carson — whose voters also want an “outsider” as nominee — as borderline nutty because of his youthful violent behavior, and so on. Trump’s always been willing to risk annoying other candidates’ committed supporters in the name of shaking loose the not so committed ones. Jeb is an especially instructive example because Trump’s main line of attack on him is that he’s a weakling. He’s “low energy,” he seems reluctant to fight back when Trump attacks, he’s not the sort of strong, self-assured leader America needs in troubled times. For all the ink spilled about why Trump’s fans are so dazzled by him, I think the alpha-male factor continues to get short shrift. Trump’s takedown of Jeb resonated because it exposed Jeb, the supposed 800-pound establishment gorilla, as a beta male who didn’t know what to do when he got slapped. He’s never been the same.

So here we are in December and there’s another guy who reeks of weakling jitters around Trump. It’s not the same type of jitters as Jeb — Cruz’s toadying to Trump has a tactical purpose whereas Jeb’s hesitance seemed more a product of his character. Even so, Trump seems to relish diminishing the men around him and Cruz’s reluctance to attack is an inscribed invitation to begin the diminishing. No one is more contemptuous of a beta male than the alpha to whom he’s toadying. Even some Cruz fans are disgusted with how far Cruz has gone to avoid conflict:

It's official. I'm embarrassed that I spent so much time helping this man get elected. Not sorry. https://t.co/1jAmiOB0X4

— C. Whalen Stephens (@CorieWStephens) December 11, 2015

If you like Cruz because he’s willing to tell Mitch McConnell to go to hell, watching him rapidly backpedal from Trump — who’s really not even pretending to be conservative at this point — is gross, whatever the strategic considerations. Which brings me back to the question: Why won’t Trump needle Cruz for acting like a beta the way he needled Jeb? He’s hinted at it before. He pointed out this morning that Cruz seems willing to criticize him in private but not in public, and he likes to note when asked about Cruz how Cruz seems to agree with literally everything he says. Painting Cruz as a beta male instead of criticizing his positions would also spare Trump from saying anything that might be taken as a criticism of conservatism, which would be a dangerous move. Again, if it’s true that Cruz’s fans are mainly loyal to the cause more so than to the man then Trump can get personal with Cruz without hopelessly alienating too many of them — weakling! toady! dumb shutdown idea! bought and sold by his alpha-male donors! — so long as he doesn’t get political. And Trump has good reason to do it. Now that polls are showing Cruz ahead in Iowa and with him having just landed Bob Vander Plaats’s endorsement, the sooner he tries to start taking Cruz down, the better for him.

If Trump launched an attack on Cruz, it would put Cruz in a bind. If he continues to hold his fire to appease Trump voters, even with Trump giving him both barrels, he’ll look even weaker than Jeb. If he decides he has no choice but to engage then he’ll probably end up alienating Trump voters even though Trump started it. That’s how cults of personalities work, after all; the leader is always right. That is to say, Trump could force Cruz into a situation where he has little to gain no matter what he does and much to lose. I think Cruz would have no choice but to hit back and to do it as politely as possible, hoping that the spectacle of him RINO-stomping Trump would appeal to some undecided anti-Trump voters on the right and boost his numbers that way. There may be voters out there who are leaning towards Rubio over Cruz but who hate Trump and would give Cruz a second look if he led the charge (reluctantly) against Trump. After all, it’s not as if Rubio’s been some warrior against Trump thus far — although he’s been tougher on him than Cruz has. How could he not be?

One more thing. The “true conservative” theory of elections for years now has been that the party will only win when it finally nominates a principled conservative who’s skilled at preaching for the cause. That’s Cruz. That’s the “bold colors, not pale pastels” strategy. Supposedly there’s a winning conservative majority out there but those voters aren’t showing up because you’re not connecting with them. You can’t win with a squish like McCain or Romney because guys like that aren’t selling full-spectrum conservatism. Go out there, show people that you’re going to govern like they want, and you’ll win every time. How come that approach isn’t working with Trump voters? Cruz is out there, preaching the good news of Reaganism, and not only is Trump leading nationally and in most states but Cruz is terrified that calling him out as a RINO, which he is, would backfire horribly. We’ve got the right messenger here, supposedly, and he’s offering the right message. Trump fans aren’t buying (yet). Why not?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016; 2016election; canadian; donaldtrump; election2016; elections; immigration; m2t; newyork; tedcruz; texas; trump; trumpwasright; twister
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Same here.

Cruz as VP is a waste.

Either Cruz as president, or he should stay in the Senate where he can actually accomplish something.


41 posted on 12/11/2015 2:01:52 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Trump is a far better choice to bring down the damned GOPEers, than Cruz is.

Not really, Trump is so bold that he hardens those opposed to him to the point that they will never support anything he wants done even if he compromises. Cruz is not attacking Trump because he wants his support when he gets the nomination and he wants Trump supporters to feel good about supporting him.

It makes no sense for Cruz to attack Trump and it is not "beta" behavior, but it is great tactics applied to a clear strategic plan.

42 posted on 12/11/2015 2:02:12 PM PST by wmfights (a stranger in a hostile and foreign land that used to be my home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

Cruz would be a much better supreme court nominee than a VP pick.


43 posted on 12/11/2015 2:02:49 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

-— Cruz fans are more populist than they are conservative -—

Uh, no.

And another thing. I thought this article would never end.


44 posted on 12/11/2015 2:03:29 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You don’t try and take down an 800 lb guerrilla until you’re well armed. (yes, I understand the difference between guerrilla and gorilla).

The two candidates have adopted very strategic and effective strategies. It’s not played out yet.


45 posted on 12/11/2015 2:03:33 PM PST by Fhios (The world holds its breath for the 2016 U.S election. White knuckles gripping the handrails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I don’t trust Cruz right now, I don’t believe anything he says right now...and it’s going to take some time for me to think about it...

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/12/11/yes-unfortunately-ted-cruz-did-support-trans-pacific-trade-deal-tpa-with-video/

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/12/11/ted-cruz-and-mark-zuckerberg-monitoring-you-cruz-donation-requests-and-campaign-surveillance-programs/


46 posted on 12/11/2015 2:04:24 PM PST by HarleyLady27 (TRUMP SUPPORTER 100% from day ONE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Shery

Sorry, but Cruz has never attacked anybody that did not attack him first. He is a gentleman and stated he’d run that kind of campaign. He responds to those who attack him, but he doesn’t just go after anybody. He will differentiate himself from the policies of others, but he has only gone after Rubio, and that was AFTER Rubio misrepresented his positions and why.
********************************************************************************
Yep, and I notice that Cruz hasn’t even bothered to counter-attack against the pathetic Jeb Bush (whose PACs are feverishly attacking Cruz and Trump in omnipresent attack ads) with his anemic poll numbers.


47 posted on 12/11/2015 2:04:29 PM PST by House Atreides (Cruz or lose! Do TG & Boogieman have to be asses every day?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Amazing this guy can write some decent stuff, and then, utter gibberish.

In a nutshell, it’s Iowa!!! Cruz and Trump, who wins? If Trump can bring to the caucus those who don’t normally caucus, Trump wins. If Cruz brings his voting block (evans & conservs), Cruz wins.

That’s all there is !!! It has absolutely nothing to do with “Alpha and beta males”, and everything to do with the respective campaign ORGANIZATIONS.

Now, for Cruz, with Iowa effectively a month away (holiday pause), and given that Iowa is now yours if only your Iowa organization can out perform Trump’s organization, why would you want to create tangential issues?


48 posted on 12/11/2015 2:05:29 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, then to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

[[Cruz won’t attack Trump, but why won’t Trump attack Cruz?]]

Because they play bridge together?


49 posted on 12/11/2015 2:07:16 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Oh yes he has...but he did it in "private". And I can't wait for Trump to hit back...in PUBLIC !

Cruz would eviscerate him. I'm sure you remember the cnbc debate. None of the candidates squawked a about the stupid, demeaning, questions until Cruz called the moderhaters out. If Trump goes after Cruz he'll get some publicity at the start, but Cruz will slice him up with his liberal/progressive history.

50 posted on 12/11/2015 2:07:33 PM PST by wmfights (a stranger in a hostile and foreign land that used to be my home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

Your in never never land...wake up!!!


51 posted on 12/11/2015 2:08:44 PM PST by HarleyLady27 (TRUMP SUPPORTER 100% from day ONE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
They seem like a great team. While I think Cruz is the right President for our time I also believe that Trump is the right candidate for our time - initiating issues others won't.
52 posted on 12/11/2015 2:09:46 PM PST by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Cruz would be a much better supreme court nominee than a VP pick.
**************************************************************************
Cruz would be a superb supreme court nominee or a superb VP pick or a superb presidential nominee.

Whether it’s Trump or Cruz who gets the Presidential nomination, it will be ESSENTIAL that the nominee picks a true constitutional conservative as his VP running mate.

In today’s world, with its insanity in the Islamic and progressive populations, you never can rule out assassination attempts.


53 posted on 12/11/2015 2:10:18 PM PST by House Atreides (Cruz or lose! Do TG & Boogieman have to be asses every day?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ncpatriot

We will need 12 years to undo what Obama has done, and to change the hearts and minds of children coming up through the Godforsaken public school system.

4 years of Trump, 8 of Cruz.


54 posted on 12/11/2015 2:12:42 PM PST by ImaGraftedBranch (If you haven't figured it out, there is a great falling away...happening before your eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I disagree.
Cruz as President of the Senate, actually exerting the constitutional authority and restoring constitutional order could be a game changer.


55 posted on 12/11/2015 2:13:36 PM PST by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Ted Cruz has generally refrained from attacking any of the GOP candidates(apart from Rubio), not just Donald Trump. Heck Ted Cruz hasn't even attacked the biggest RINO of them all Linda Graham, despite Graham constantly taking potshots at Cruz.
The only guy Cruz has really attacked is Rubio, and that was after Rubio and Rubio PAC'S started running nasty attack ads (chock full of lies) against Ted Cruz.
Cruz has been the most eloquent and most effective source of missiles against Obama and the GOPe. That together with attacks against Hilary Clinton is where it's at.
Cruz can win without attacking Trump. Cruz needs to win Iowa, then have Ben Carson and Huckabee drop out and pick up their voters, especially if he gets Carson to endorse him.:
56 posted on 12/11/2015 2:16:27 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27
Your in never never land...wake up!!!

This would be about the best Trump could hit Cruz with. It might get some headlines, but the real heat would come when Cruz responds. Trump's Achilles heal is his lifelong liberalism.

At this point I'll believe Trump when he claims to be a conservative now, but I still have the opportunity to support and vote for a conservative who has always been a conservative and hasn't changed even though he's been under constant attack since going to DC.

57 posted on 12/11/2015 2:18:41 PM PST by wmfights (a stranger in a hostile and foreign land that used to be my home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I think they absolutely have some kind of understanding.


58 posted on 12/11/2015 2:18:44 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Trump — who’s really not even pretending to be conservative at this point”

Really? All of his policies are not conservative? Deporting illegals is not conservative? A moratorium on Muslims is not conservative?

Cruz supporters keep trying this tired line, while Trump’s positions are more conservative and more aimed at helping Americans than Cruz’s.


59 posted on 12/11/2015 2:19:41 PM PST by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

He has proven he ain’t no good at attacking. Stellar. He hasn’t touched Rubio.


60 posted on 12/11/2015 2:19:54 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson