Posted on 12/06/2015 11:22:39 AM PST by Jim Robinson
Whose religion commands its followers to kill infidels?
Whose religion commands its followers to invade, conquer and dominate the earth?
Whose religion commands its followers to terrorize its neighbors?
Whose religion has a 1400 year history of invading, conquering and terrorizing neighboring countries?
Whose religion is currently in the process of actually infiltrating, invading, terrorizing and conquering peaceful nations?
If one readily identifiable group of barbaric aliens is dead set on infiltrating, invading, terrorizing, conquering and dominating your country, why the hell would you not profile them?
Yes, of course!
Yes, just as we should profile members of the nazi party. Both are violent, hate-filled ideologies.
There is very little difference between Nazi and Islamic fascism, except the Islamic fascists are more bloodthirsty.
It took a world war to defeat the Nazi fascists and will take the same to defeat the current fascist scourge. All civilized Judeo-Christian nations should unite against our common enemy. If Obama is not up to the task, let Putin lead.
The New Crusade for a New Generation...coming soon to a neighborhood near us!
This one for the msot part won’t be fought on foot on astride a four legged steed. but it must be fought.
Agreed - that's the key. Islam is a government, not a religion.
Amen!
“Donald J. Trump â€Â@realDonaldTrump 5 minutes ago
I will be live-tweeting President Obama’s prime-time speech tonight starting at 7:50 P.M. (Eastern).Will he finally state the real problems?
369 retweets 823 likes”
Great! I can’t stomach watching the Muslim defends his comrades, but I’ll be seeing what Trump says!
“In WW2 we interned Japanese for their own protection (we are taught this anyway) I think this option should be explored again. “
Exactly! We are at war again so need to monitor those from the enemy area.
And the Japanese were interned to stop them from signaling ships and planes on the west coast. Liberal teachers like to play the bleeding-heart crap, but our national security came first back then. Imagine that!
Simply disregard and carry on.
A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this nation cannot endure, permanently half Judeo-Christian and half Muslim. I do not expect the mation to be dissolved— I do not expect the house to fall— but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.
Fact: Islam simply cannot co-exist with Judeo-Christianity or any other religion. The Koran forbids it.
Perfectly stated, Jim. It's my feeling that the whole western world (with the exception of the idiotic left) is waking up to the immutable truths you've stated above.
In my view, Islam must undergo a modern reformation if it's to ever peacefully coexist with the broader civilization of mankind. It's either that, or a second Crusade. The ball is in the muslim's court.
BTTT!
None of that would surprise me about the Saudi’s. I think we have more to be worried about from them than Iran. Thanks for putting it out there.
Lets see, the conflict you are referring to is the call for a national permit system (because here in CA I do not stand a chance of getting a CC permit and I was of the opinion that I would stand a better chance with a national system) and the obvious conflicting aspect that I stand for our freedoms?
I agree they are in conflict, why should a permit be required to carry in the first place?
The answer is that I would like the situation to be different and allow my right to carry to be legal. If need be, I suspect I will violate this requirement if my safety were at stake. I already do not intend to comply with a requirement that I turn my weapons over to authorities.
Agreed. there is one constitution and laws that do not conform should be dissolved. We have already set too many precedents for area lawlessness. One of my hopes is that Trump will eliminate those in the area of immigrant activity.
>> Renouncing Islam should be required for entry to the United States.
Islam is a war plan.
This is the best case to shut every mosque down in America
Deport all Imams and forbid teaching of the Koran in America
Islam is in direct conflict with our moral values as a Nation.
Jim, I don’t know if you’ve seen this video but it was made a year ago. It spells out Obama’s intentions.
http://threepercenternation.com/2014/09/isis-or-isil/
Thank you for responding. As you may suspect the main thrust my query was meant to evoke an analysis of the conflict on your part and I have succeeded in that effort. However, it was also meant to point out that advocating for a national government permit to replace that of a state permit to overcome violations of the Second Amendment would only subject your right to carry to the changes of the political makeup of federal law makers. The case of the assault weapons ban being one illustration. It is my hope that by pointing out this conflict that your remarks regarding the issuance of permits be reconsidered.
I add that as a former long time resident of California I have empathy with your predicament. I recognized the futility of attempting to change the political mindset which is dominant in that state and fled to Arizona rather than risk life and freedom of movement as a result of exercising a Constitutional right. I admit to minor cowardice due to my being long in the tooth and having obligations to family best served by remaining alive and free to a limited degree. I consider myself as being a refugee who has fled from a communist state with the knowledge that the flight will be a brief respite before the eventual confrontation occurs. Governor Brown’s most recent remarks concerning the supposed easy access to weapons of war in the adjoining states indicate the political poison of California is intended to influence our legislative representatives and those at the federal level; remarks which represent a threat to this redoubt. Here we have the benefit of Constitutional carry. Open or concealed, rifle or sidearm, afoot or in our vehicle, without the requirement of governmental permission. A concealed weapons permit is only required to meet the conditions for interstate travel to carry weapons concealed in those states where the permits are honored. To date our legislators remain committed to maintaining our freedom in this regard although as I stated the confrontation is seemingly inevitable.
Again, I thank you for the response and the open expression of your intention within it.
Thank you for the insight. You have indeed pointed out some aspects of a national permit that I had not considered. My thought was influenced by Trump and my initial thought was that a federal permit would overrule any CA restrictions, but you are correct, how could CA every give up any of their restrictions? (sarc)
I too have tried to leave Ca twice, both times for settlement in TX (which has the right firearms environment as well as lower State taxes). However it was not to be, one time my job folded up shop and the second time our son was injured and needed our care. He now has chosen CA as his work place and while we are retired, we are staying nearby because our bond was strengthened by his long recovery and rehab and we are now willing to put up with the silly things that CA folk seem willing to impose upon themselves. However I still want to see what changes a Trump administration may bring. Again cheers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.