Posted on 11/27/2015 11:20:41 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Colorado Springs police responded this afternoon to reports of an active shooter at a Planned Parenthood facility:
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
I hope you don’t have any qualms
assigning the term of murder to
“partial-birth” abortions, do you?
The only way it cannot be murder is if the "fetus" is something other than human.
1. A baby would prevent me from doing what I want to do
2. Baby's daddy said he would leave me if I don't abort
3. I hate the father of the child
4. The baby would be disabled and who wants a deformed child
5. A baby would mean I couldn't spend all my money on myself
F U and never EVER speak for me you Godless POS
“If you can’t see that it is morally superior to fight against the pulling apart an innocent human being limb from limb, then frankly you have no business being on this website, or voting, for that matter.”
So you are saying you fully support anyone who goes into a Planned Parenthood clinic and starts killing everyone connected with abortions? If not, why not?
You are disgusting. I'm not even going to reply to your revolting accusation-laden 'question'.
I'm confused - I thought he was robbing a bank and then entered PP as he was shooting it out with the cops?
You, sir, are totally full of shit, and a damn troll for certain.
Beyond disgustin,he is straight lib wacko3
I appreciate the tone of your comments but respectfully disagree.
In actual practice, abortion and murder are very similar acts... a form of homicide. Abortion is deemed "legal" by virtue of a dubious constitutional interpretation. But, for me, the acts are essentially the same. And Roe will not be the law forever.
I am no expert, but I have a hard time believing that most abortions are performed for "profound reasons". I would expect that it is an emotional process that haunts many, but personal convenience and lifestyle preference is not sufficient to terminate a human life in utero. Medical necessity is a form of self defense and a separate discussion.
Adults are accountable for the reasonably likely consequences of their behavior. I believe a woman has the right to choose. She just has to choose before she helps form a new being.
I read today that we have lost 50 million Americans since Roe. That is absolutely shameful. I can't believe any portion of our society tolerates this practice while at the same time being obsessed with politically correct trivialities like the name of our sports teams or our former Olympians. And I am not sure I still believe we have a culture or a form of government that can resolve these problems.
Seriously??
Ugh.
No. That's like saying that because a significant number of deluded people agree with committing a crime it is right, or at least worthy of discussion.
Your situational ethics are showing.
I frankly don't care how many people think it is right to shred a baby in the womb, it is murder.
The only thing that affects what people can legally do about it is the legal system.
Now, let me throw it back at you.
If you were in a hospital near the nursery and someone was in there cutting babies apart, would you, given the means, kill them in order to stop the slaughter?
Please explain to me why a few weeks earlier that would be the wrong thing to do?
It is one of those cognitive disconnects of our legal system, whether for convenience, the money, or the sheer love of human sacrifice, that makes the defense of the baby in a cradle legal and the defense of the unborn not.
Not according to an eyewitness who is quoted extensively in the CS Gazette.
bye
“To say that the 50% of the public that supports a woman’s right to have an abortion support murder is sophistry.”
To say anything else is sophistry. An innocent human life is deliberately taken without due process of law. There is no word other than “murder” with which to adequately describe this horror.
“There are profound reasons to support either side.”
I used to think so, decades ago. Much study, discussion, thought, and prayer disabused me of that notion.
To speak of a woman’s “right” to kill her preborn baby is to howl nonsense at a universe wherein one does not expect to encounter God.
There can *never* be any justification for the taking of an innocent human life under such circumstances. In the final analysis, there is nothing more to say than that. All else is deception.
“We should recognize that and not seek to clothe ourselves in moral superiority in our support of either.”
I really hate that tactic, which tries to paint a moral stand as a character flaw.
Thomas Sowell wrote, “It is amazing how many people think that they can answer an argument by attributing bad motives to those who disagree with them. Using this kind of reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything about anything, without having to bother to deal with facts or logic.”
Facts and logic reveal to the open mind that the pro-murder and anti-murder positions are not, as you would have it, on the same moral plane.
Whom Satan would destroy, he first blinds to reason. This explains Roe v. Wade and the acceptance it has gained.
Having just read your “in forum” responses to this and other subjects to see from where you are coming, I am convinced you are trolling. Your last comment, though, was kind of the cake topper. It really outed you.
Have you met the Viking Kitties? Well, you just might....
Well said!
Very much so.
see #1214. He has indeed met the kitties
Very low key zot ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.