Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With Republicans Like These, Who Need Enemies?
Townhall.com ^ | November 5, 2015 | Derek Hunter

Posted on 11/05/2015 6:16:38 AM PST by Kaslin

Hillary Clinton lies to the country for 11 hours, and the Democratic Party rallies around her while she declares victory. None of the Americans murdered because of her incompetence were brought back to life and none of the families lied to about a YouTube video were comforted, but still she turned that into the best week ever.

Republicans, on the other hand, had a golden opportunity and they blew it.

After the CNBC debate and the bias it laid bare, the field was united. The party was united. There was an opportunity to change, maybe even revolutionize the debate process.

Then Republicans acted like Republicans again.

The greatest opponent Republican candidates face is not the media, nor the Democrats. It's themselves.

Had the field held together for more than 20 minutes, we could've been looking at some serious debates focused on issues. But that didn't happen.

Rather than focus on the big picture and make changes, the GOP field became Van Halen demanding the vanquishing of brown M&Ms. Actually, Van Halen had a damn good reason for the brown M&Ms rider in its contract; the GOP was simply being stupid.

The unified field didn't even last long enough to form a coherent demand. What emerged was drivel.

They wanted control over the info boxes that appear on screen. They demanded the temperature be set at 67 degrees. They wanted…who cares? When you're arguing over the temperature of the venue, you've lost sight of the reason you're in your super-secret meeting in the first place.

Chris Christie and Carly Fiorina both said they'd debate "anywhere at anytime." Great, congratulations. Jeb Bush and John Kasich refused to sign on to anything. Donald Trump said he'd negotiate his own deal with the networks. Yeah, helpful.

None of those moves were smart. Nor surprising.

Unity could have brought about an agreement on topics, changed the tone, kept the focus on the media's bias. Instead we have bickering campaigns looking for an advantage.

Nothing wrong with that, necessarily. That's what campaigns do. But for the love of God, couldn't these people wait a few days?

That the also-ran candidates were more than happy to agree to anything wasn't a surprise, especially given their well-received performances in the first two debates. And their public calls for two panels of seven were transparently self-serving. But what were the others thinking?

Christie and Fiorina want to be seen as unafraid, like they'’re the only candidates willing to take on the media no matter what. That and $2.50 will get you a cup of coffee.

Kasich and Bush are, well, Kasich and Bush.

And Trump. Donald Trump will do whatever it takes to win which, were he a principled conservative, would be an admirable and reassuring quality. As it stands it's worrisome considering the ease with which he contradicts himself and his past statements, something within the same interview.

I've kept my powder dry for the most part when it comes to the GOP field. I prefer to keep my guns pointed at the other side, not down the line in my own trench. But this is one of the dumbest weeks of the campaign.

A real opportunity was had and lost because these adults couldn't come together around a couple of coherent and valid points. Insisting on gamesmanship over principle, they've squandered the momentum for change the CNBC debate presented.

As the Democrats coalesce around Hillary, she's spending her time attacking Republicans. Rather than returning that favor, Republicans are fighting with each other about temperature and other worthless insignificances.

Only people who pay attention to politics a year from an election will remember how awful CNBC was, and they're already aware of the bias in media. The wider window of public consciousness is closing. Thanks to GOP squabbling, the story has moved on.

It's dumb, it's unfortunate, and it's the one thing at which Republicans excel.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016election; cnbcdebate; gopfield; republicans

1 posted on 11/05/2015 6:16:39 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It was CNBC and its gang that “blew it”.


2 posted on 11/05/2015 6:17:28 AM PST by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The problem with this article is, the writer assumes “Republicans” want the same things. We probably have a greater divide between the conservative wing, and the donor class wing than there is between Democrats and establishment Republicans. Each side wants the debates to promote their agenda.


3 posted on 11/05/2015 6:23:01 AM PST by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The tipping point will come. Gun sales are at a record.


4 posted on 11/05/2015 6:34:09 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The first problem with the Republican 'dumbness' is that too many candidates are currently in the field, and being treated as if they are still relevant. {If these candidates don't have the self-awareness of Scott Walker, you can assume their intellect isn't very high.}

Which, you don't see in the Dem part. Sure, some are still running, but you don't see any oxygen being spent on them.

Here, we see Christie (and some others) being mentioned as if he's going to mount a realistic comeback and be some one important. Just as an example.

Top priority is to winnow down to 4 -5 candidates, and republican base can put more serious thought into the election process.

5 posted on 11/05/2015 7:50:01 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
Top priority is to winnow down to 4 -5 candidates,

They will eventually go down to this number. I can not imagine that all will stay in

6 posted on 11/05/2015 7:55:03 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

As the numbers on the stage start to fall it will accelerate the process of declining for the also-rans. This will clear out the brush Senior Amnesty and Ben have been hiding behind.
Ted Cruz will be the last opponent left and when people see him as a great Supreme Court Justice in a Trump Administration that will be that.
Trump will gather Cruz and Carson and John Bolton, Palin and the rest of the team he will promise to appoint and it will be devastating to Granny Clinton.


7 posted on 11/05/2015 8:34:26 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson