Skip to comments.
Fox News: We'll put on a better debate than CNBC (Dump Gerard Baker as mod, he's not a US citizen)
Fortune ^
| 10/29/15
| Victor Luckerson
Posted on 10/30/2015 3:59:55 AM PDT by jimbo123
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Fox should immediately dump Gerard Baker as moderator. He's not a U.S. citizen and can't even vote! Why is a foreigner moderating a GOP debate? Get him the hell out of there, Priebus!
1
posted on
10/30/2015 3:59:55 AM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: jimbo123
.....not even a US citizen.....
Well, at least you can be assured he can’t vote Democrat like the rest of the so-called moderators......:0)
2
posted on
10/30/2015 4:01:43 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: jimbo123
I never heard of Gerard Baker, but how RIDICULOUS that he's not even a CITIZEN!!!!
FOX is UNWATCHABLE anymore.
3
posted on
10/30/2015 4:02:18 AM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: jimbo123
Trump, Carson, Cruz, and some other front runners should get together and do a debate by themselves, entirely internet-streaming, and available on youtube.
Screw the MSM
4
posted on
10/30/2015 4:03:48 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
(Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
To: Gaffer; All
5
posted on
10/30/2015 4:04:16 AM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: jimbo123
It was a joke. Of course there is no earthly reason why a noncitizen foreigner should moderate a GOP debate.
6
posted on
10/30/2015 4:06:06 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: jimbo123
I still think the original alphabets should rotate the remaining debates
At least we'd learn if the kardashians or Survivor really DO command such attention
7
posted on
10/30/2015 4:07:02 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true .... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: All
Hey, Rinse! Why the hell is a FOREIGNER moderating a GOP presidential debate?
8
posted on
10/30/2015 4:07:50 AM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: jimbo123
I think the candidates should band together and tell them that they get to pick the moderators. Think of the ratings faux loses without a debate. The candidates need to flog the donkey here and good.
9
posted on
10/30/2015 4:09:05 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Caipirabob
Not only should the candidates choose the moderators, they should inform their chairman Reince Preibus Rancid Penis that he needs to step down in favor of a NON-RINO chairman. I suggest Allen West.
10
posted on
10/30/2015 4:11:51 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Bushes? Clintons? They're all one big "UNI-FAMILY", "WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?")
To: jimbo123
Since Fox messed up the last debate, why would we expect the next one to be better?
To: jimbo123
Replace Baker with Steyn. Foreign born, but a naturalized citizen.
12
posted on
10/30/2015 4:20:36 AM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(Congress will have blood on their hands if anything happens because of the Iran appeasement)
To: fatnotlazy
If Fox wants Fox people. Replace Meegun with Laura Ingraham, then The to fellows with Hannity and Steyn
13
posted on
10/30/2015 4:24:25 AM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(Congress will have blood on their hands if anything happens because of the Iran appeasement)
To: jimbo123
CNBC’s debate was at least more fair than the first Fox debate—they asked the nasty questions of everyone, instead of just targeting Trump.
To: jimbo123
All future debates should contain the following provisions:
1. Verbal disclosure at the outset of the debate any familial ties between employees of the network and the Clinton Adminsitration, the Obama administration and any Democratic campaigns
2. Amount of donations of members of the network to democratic campaigns
3. Amount of donations of members of the network to the Clinton foundation and
4. Once a question is asked, the microphones of all the moderators shall be turned off until the candidate has finished their answer.
15
posted on
10/30/2015 4:32:02 AM PDT
by
nonliberal
(Sent from a payphone in a whorehouse in Mexico.)
To: PapaBear3625
It would be great if they’d fashion them as updated versions of the ol’ Lincoln-Douglas debates.
They could ask each other the questions directly, with shorter speaking periods, of course, and have tech time down their mics on a prearranged schedule.
To: BigEdLB
Naturalized Citizen is okay. But GOP candidates should not be answering questions from a smug, anti-American FOREIGNER in a U.S. presidential debate.
17
posted on
10/30/2015 4:41:02 AM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: jimbo123
Fox News had their chance and failed miserably. They better get their act together for the next Fox News debate.
18
posted on
10/30/2015 4:47:44 AM PDT
by
Mozilla
To: jimbo123
19
posted on
10/30/2015 4:48:13 AM PDT
by
Mozilla
To: Mozilla
20
posted on
10/30/2015 4:50:50 AM PDT
by
jimbo123
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson