Can someone like Drudge live stream the next GOP debate?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3354327/posts ^ | cottonball

[Red Badger]

True, the NSA could handle it though...............

[timestax]

Drudge had his own T.V. show back in the day, and it was a smashing success. BUT, I guessed he didn’t like being in front of T.V. cameras, so he got out of the T.V. business .I believe his show was on Saturday evenings. right?

[Louis Foxwell]

The best idea is to get the top 5 candidates in a room with their own mikes and a cameras one each of them. Split the screen in 5 parts and have at it, a Lincoln/Douglas free for all.
These are grown men one of whom we will elect to act without moderator or script. Can they not be trusted to act like adults?

[nomad]

Then distribute it to numerous sites, as long as they`re Conservative in nature. There was even a suggestion to give the rights to small cable channels, what do you think? Either way, I`d still want the internet to be the primary host.

[deport]

The next two GOP debates:

http://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2016-debate-schedule/2016-republican-primary-debate-schedule/

Tuesday, November 10, 2015
Fox Business/WSJ Republican Debate
9pm ET (8pm CT, 6pm PT) - Main Debate
6pm ET (5pm CT, 3pm PT) - Undercard Debate
Aired On: Fox Business Network (Channel finder)
Location: Milwaukee Theatre in Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Sponsors: Fox Business Network, Wall Street Journal
Moderators: Neil Cavuto, Maria Bartiromo, and Gerard Baker
Candidates: Candidates who score 2.5 percent or higher in an average of the four most recent
national polls conducted through Nov. 4 will be invited to the main debate stage, the rest on
the undercard stage

Tuesday, December 15, 2015
CNN/Salem Republican Debate
Aired On: CNN
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Sponsors: CNN, Salem Media Group
Candidates: To be determined

[nomad]

I never saw it, pity. Someone said the blowhard Glenn Beck agreed to host it at the Blaze but I don`t trust that self serving jerk. Let him send toys to illegals and keep up his childish, morning gibberish.

[RKBA Democrat]

Breitbart could do it easily and would likely jump at the opportunity. Same with OAN.

[Dr. Sivana]

The Internet is the medium of the future, whether or not a cable channel hosts some of it, it must be on-line to make a critical point: WE DON`T NEED THE DINOSUAR BROADCASTING ENTITIES!

I know. I haven't had a television since 1987. But we aren't in the future yet. In my response, I already assumed that there'd be a live stream as well. But no, that is not sufficient for the many people who still use their television for watching these things.

[justlurking]

Last night’s debate had 14 million viewers. The bandwidth needed to stream to 14 million viewers at one time would be enormous and expensive.

But, there are companies that can do it.

One of them might do it for the bragging rights.

[nomad]

Ok, but my point is, the whole point of using alternative media would be to keep it out of the Rat party`s, so called, fourth estate`s hands.

I know I`m nobody to make terms, but if we speak with a united voice, we may be heard here. DON`T SUPPORT THE ENEMY MEDIA. Let them pound sand!

[nomad]

How about spreading it out amongst numerous internet entities? Drudge, Breitbart, maybe even that blowhard Beck`s Blaze? And what about letting Freerepublic in on it? Can this site handle a live streaming thread?

[Dr. Sivana]

Ok, but my point is, the whole point of using alternative media would be to keep it out of the Rat party`s, so called, fourth estate`s hands.

Anyone with money can get access to over the air TV stations and cable/satellite with no issue. Reagan bought a half-hour of time in '76 to win the North Carolina primary. You WILL NOT get 30 million people watching an Internet stream. Netflix thought the future arrived, and they had to walk that back really fast.

[justlurking]

How about spreading it out amongst numerous internet entities? Drudge, Breitbart, maybe even that blowhard Beck`s Blaze? And what about letting Freerepublic in on it? Can this site handle a live streaming thread?

No, FR can't handle a live stream.

Technically, it's not an easy thing to do, when scaled to millions of viewers.

This is best left to the professionals.

[kvanbrunt2]

Rinse Pubic said that the candidates can’t do any unofficial debates or they will face double secret probation.

[kvanbrunt2]

rinse pubic won’t allow it.

[McGruff]

Right Side radio is the best I’ve found.

https://www.youtube.com/user/rightsideradio

[justlurking]

Rinse Pubic said that the candidates can’t do any unofficial debates or they will face double secret probation.

I think you miss the point.

The GOP should hold their OWN official debates, and invite the lamestream media to distribute them, if they wish.

By livestreaming it themselves, they cut out the old media altogether.

[nomad]

Well this may be the time for true mavericks to tell him to get bent. What`s he gonna do, throw a tantrum?

[Impy]

They should let Sean Hannity moderate Hillary and Bernie’s next debate.

[Chickensoup]

Probably all the conservative sites would have to stream with one site filming and sending out the stream.

Radio shows that play during that time would have to be in on it and stream as well.

It is about damned time that conservatives worked together to get the word out instead of just sniping at each other.