Skip to comments.What if a Democratic National Socialist debate was like the treatment given the GOP on CNBC?
Posted on 10/29/2015 7:43:25 AM PDT by Torcert
Mrs. Clinton: Why Should anyone trust a proven Liar such as yourself in the nation's highest office?
Mrs. Clinton: How is your socialist national agenda Different from Mr. Obama's socialist national agenda?
Please be specific and explain why that agenda wouldn't be an unmitigated disaster as it has every time in the past.
Mrs. Clinton: If you don't have to obey the rule of law, please explain why anyone else has to?
Mrs. Clinton: What is the point of Intergalactic Background Checks if not for registration and Confiscation?
Mr. Sanders: Please cite a Real World example (i.e. Not a small culturally homogenous nation that doesn't need to pay for their own defense) of a place where Socialism or it's many variations .......Bolshevism, collectivism, Communism, consumer Socialism, democratic Socialism, Fabianism, Fascism, leftism, Leninism, Marxism, Maoism, Marxism,Leninism, neo-Marxism, progressivism, social democracy, statism, Trotskyism, utopian socialism............ has Actually worked.
Mr. Sanders: Please explain why Socialist nations have to oppress their own people in order to maintain itâs power?
Mr. Sanders: Given that we've already had 8 long years of Socialist failure with Obama, why would any sane person want more of the same?
Mr. O';malley: Given that your party has already admitted to it's ultimate goal of Gun Confiscation, why should anyone believe anything else it has to say on the subject?
Mr. O';malley: Given your predilection for posing shirtless, do you consider yourself the US version of Vladimir Putin?
Mrs. Obama: Would you say your were at least if not more accomplished and qualified than Mrs. Mrs. Clinton given your similar backgrounds and experience?
Mrs. Obama: If you become Madam Presidente, how often would you use your gender and ethnicity to demonize your opposition or would your alternate them given each situation.?
Mrs. Warren: What is the source of your party's definition of "Socialism is taxpayer funds being used collectively to benefit society as a whole", Given that many of the benefits therein came about a few centuries BEFORE the creation of the concept? ( i.e. Law, Civilization, etc.)
[That last one is a personal favorite - I really want to know whence that ‘definition’ came from]
Ms Clinton, what happened to the 10,000 MANPADS lost in the Benghazi and where is the 147 tons of Libyan gold?
That’s another good one - no doubt she would say she lost them in her server in the bathroom closet...
Well I’m going to take a position I don’t see us airing very often.
Yeah the media is unfair and ignorant. The GOP needs to get over it. All they do is whine about the debate is too long, I don’t like my green room, the questions are unfair. Whine, whine, whine, whine.
Who on EARTH thinks that is gonna get votes and win a General Election? Stop the whining and man up and answer. Stop playing for the spotlight. If a single one of them does that, they will stand out, impress, and gain converts to Conservatism.
Instead they act like a pack of spoiled, whining brats. Every single one of them ... even the ones I like.
A GOP Debate is best summed up by ... I wonder what they are going to complain about this time.
The world isn’t fair. Get used to it. Be a man.
I’d just as soon see them all cancel and have a debate of their own choosing.
Today, no one is talking about the zinger Rubio gave to Clinton about the Benghazi hearing. He made a point that she admitted to lying and covering up to the whole world and the MSM cheered her on. It was good.
Excellent questions. The DNC won’t allow any kind of moderator or network to conduct their suicide— unlike Reince-out washout Priebus who put the GOP candidates on a public forum designed to kill off the conservative wing.
But like your questions.
“Ms Clinton, Do you find lying to the American people easy?”
I would tend to agree.
It would be like starting a football game starting with the other team having 10 points on the scoreboard.
Pass them around, I’d love to see some journalist with the conjones to even ask one of those questions.
It would be a game changer..
The #National Socialist Media can do that all they want - but they had better be honest about who they are.
They don’t that - instead they maintain the false pretense that they are ‘objective’.
We on the Right know that, but the Low Information Bunch doesn’t - That’s the problem and part of the reason for the country’s dire plight.
“Who on EARTH thinks that is gonna get votes and win a General Election? Stop the whining and man up and answer. Stop playing for the spotlight. If a single one of them does that, they will stand out, impress, and gain converts to Conservatism.”
Only nearly all the Republicans and most of the Independents.
Cruz calling the Media out on its one sided support of the Democrats got the most approval *ever* from both Republicans and Independents.
You will never get fair play; this is the reason so many low information voters are de facto opposed to conservative candidates. Their entire multi-generational perspective of such candidates is shaped by the media. The burning question is why the RNC has not long ago organized their own debate with their own hand picked moderators.
Imagine how much better political life would be if there was a true conservative news outlet. Fox News has gone squishy and now our choices are limited to Leftist, Far Leftist, and Fox at Center Leftist.
Any chance The Donald might be convinced to skip political advertising and instead spend his campaign millions to buy ABC and convert it into the All Breitbart Channel?
The New ABC could then host a debate, moderated by Mark Levin, Michael Savage and Rush Limbagh. Oh yeah! I’d watch that, over and over again!
But half the viewers are low-information types who are not aware of the unfairness and would only recognize it if it bit THEM on the @$$. It does need to be brought to their attention at least once.
Despite the fact that I think he should have dropped out a fortnight ago, Lindsey Graham had a great line in the under card debate:
Lindsey re Sanders—”he went to the Soviet Union on his honeymoon and I don't think he ever came back!”—is one of the best cracks ever
Excellent points all around.
Fox news is a major disappointment these days.
And I would love it someone would buy out one of those floundering #NationalSocialistMedia networks and did that.
They would make a mint.
We’re talking about a mass brainwashing operation - a real life version of the movie Idiocracy overlaid with socialist propaganda.
“Any chance The Donald might be convinced to skip political advertising and instead spend his campaign millions to buy ABC and convert it into the All Breitbart Channel?”
They will not sell to a conservative. The leftist agenda is far more important to them than money.
The NYTs has been offered good money, but they would rather keep losing ratings and money rather than sell to a mild conservative.
The Washington Post sold only to someone they thought was a fellow traveler, then it turned out that Bezos had a mild Liberterian streak, and even had some integrity! I bet that they are really regretting that sale.
Ever wonder why there were no NRA ads on TV for decades?
It was because the media cartel would not sell time to them.
The only channel that is carrying NRA ads and I kid you not is FoxNews.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.