From the article:
"The overriding implication of the Benghazi hearing seemed to be that Hillary Clinton was so crass, unfeeling and politically self-involved as to not care if members of her State Department were massacred. Again, Hillary has a lot of flaws, but we're supposed to believe that she doesn't have a problem with dead Americans? Seriously?"
Isn't that PRECISELY one of the points being made?
Just pipe dreams.
600 Hillary-ignored security requests show that
Ms. Clinton either did NOT care, or wanted
the Ambassador taken, raped, and swapped for the
Blind Sheik.
Clearly they got the message as much as they tried to avoid it....
She is crass and unfeeling. Those are only the less serious character flaws she possesses. The hearings also showcased Mrs. Clinton’s ability to lie with ease—without even batting an eye. The woman is a sociopath. She did nothing to quell the feelings of a majority of the public that feels she is untruthful.
Wouldn’t go THAT far, but you’d think he was on her payroll.
Like trying to wash blood off of your hands.
Exactly. The left puts out one lie after another without anyone on our side refuting it. The old saying is so true here that if a lie is repeated often enough it becomes the truth. The Democrats lie through their teeth, and through every orifice of their bodies, but since nobody on our side takes them to task, or wages an agressive media campaign to combat them, they’re getting away with everything.
The mainstream press IS playing it this way....let’s see what happens.
The email issue arose from a FOIA request from Judicial Watch as I recall.
I don't know that any (And I could be wrong) criminal information has been uncovered by this committee.
As for the legitimate role of oversight, I think they accomplished that long ago when they discovered Clinton was negligent on security requests, and she lied about the Video.
.... got people feeling sorry for Hillary Clinton...
“If you’re going to shoot the King, don’t miss.”
Trey missed.
.
As usual, they are rolling STONED!
.
The laws do not apply to the left. If they get nabbed by one, they just sue and the judicial tyrants change the law.
Rolling Stone...
Hillary was asked 200+ for more security for our Ambassador in Libya. Hillary refused. Why do you feel she will keep our country safe when she is President of the U.S.A.?
this op-ed is an example of raw politics. Cold callous lefties don’t care about how Americans died. Truly heartless
>>Over the course of 11 long hours, they made the most eloquent argument for a Hillary Clinton presidency yet offered by anyone, including Clinton herself.
So, she will be elected on a sympathy vote because Trey Gowdy was mean to her? Sadly, the LIVs will probably think that way—but they would vote for her if she was already in prison. They have taken “low information” to a new low.
Rolling Stone gathers no moss, or credibility either, for that matter.
Looks like they’re trying to build up the inevitable persona again.