Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: markomalley
I’m pretty sure that is a violation of the Constitution.
2 posted on
10/19/2015 6:26:44 PM PDT by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: markomalley
To: markomalley
Have they ever heard of the “Emancipation Proclamation”?
4 posted on
10/19/2015 6:27:05 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: markomalley
Seems to be in conflict with Amendment 13.
Not that that matters anymore.
5 posted on
10/19/2015 6:27:10 PM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: markomalley
Sounds like servitude to me.
6 posted on
10/19/2015 6:28:02 PM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: markomalley
Take the money. Leave. Dont look back. It can always be reasonably inconvenient to help. Reasonably is a subjective term and cant be proven.
Bye.
7 posted on
10/19/2015 6:30:00 PM PDT by
Sequoyah101
(It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
To: markomalley
This is the bankers equivalent of pi$$ing off your waitress or chef. A big no no.
9 posted on
10/19/2015 6:30:23 PM PDT by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: markomalley
I see the point of the bank but I don't agree with it. Likely there is a lot of proprietary software constructed for this bank and not documented very well. I'm guessing they want to be able to ask what was going on when so and so wrote this or why is this section in here etc. etc. or maybe they're going to migrate to different software and need help.
But tough toodles for them. I would have took that severance agreement straight to a lawyer.
10 posted on
10/19/2015 6:30:31 PM PDT by
DouglasKC
(I'm pro-choice when it comes to lion killing....)
To: markomalley
11 posted on
10/19/2015 6:30:32 PM PDT by
PGalt
To: markomalley
If I had any money with this company I would move it somewhere else. This is basically slavery.
12 posted on
10/19/2015 6:30:36 PM PDT by
Some Fat Guy in L.A.
(Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
To: markomalley
In a move to well, let’s say “take advantage” of their former employees, to make a few more dollars, this bank might just end up losing a huge lawsuit over this.
Big time.
I sure hope so. I have no sympathy for this nonsense.
Bring back American jobs.
To: markomalley
I would tell them where to stick their severance package.
16 posted on
10/19/2015 6:32:07 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(There's a right to gay marriage in the Constitution but there is no right of an unborn baby to life.)
To: markomalley
Translation: "We don't think IT is very important and we certainly don't feel like paying you guys to do it for us any more...but just in case something comes up that might endanger next quarter's executive bonuses, stay by the phone for a while."
17 posted on
10/19/2015 6:32:58 PM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
("Don't judge all Muslims by a few lunatics - judge all gun owners by a few lunatics." - The DNC)
To: markomalley
1. The idiot bank doesn’t seem to know the meaning of the word severance; a severance which they have executed.
2. If they thought about it for more than 5 seconds, the idiot bank might realize it’s probably a bad idea to try and force work out of a terminated employee without compensation; especially when that work involves giving the employee access to the computer systems.
3. The idiot bank also didn’t consider the tremendous bad PR this sort of move generates,
19 posted on
10/19/2015 6:35:08 PM PDT by
Flick Lives
(One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
To: markomalley
The article is silent about the terms of the severance. They are only telling us the consulting requirement. What is the severance package? If that package is worthless, then it would be easy to walk away from the whole deal. If the severance package is considerable, then they will be paid, in effect, for their consulting services.
To: markomalley
Former employees. If the bank is willing to do this sleazy move, just think what they have done in the past. Band together, put up a few hundred dollars each and hire an attorney and investigator. Dig up the dirt. What you do with the dirt is your business.
To: markomalley
24 posted on
10/19/2015 6:37:52 PM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: markomalley
Let’s see.....two years on call? OK. I’ll do it for one million dollars per year.
25 posted on
10/19/2015 6:38:16 PM PDT by
mosaicwolf
(Strength and Honor)
To: markomalley
Calm down everybody. It is a bank. They are not bound by your silly laws, morals, constitution. If you don’t like it don’t do business (or work) with them.
You couldn’t build enough 5 star prisons to hold them accountable.
28 posted on
10/19/2015 6:40:53 PM PDT by
nicepaco
To: markomalley
So, I see Suntrust is hiring bottom of the stack it people now. Good luck with that.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson