To: dontreadthis
they polled me for this.
said I supported Cruz but thought Trump would win.
2 posted on
10/12/2015 5:23:31 AM PDT by
TexasFreeper2009
(You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
To: dontreadthis
This can’t be right. Marco Rubio said so.
3 posted on
10/12/2015 5:24:39 AM PDT by
MichaelCorleone
(Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
To: dontreadthis
Well, since Trump can pull up to 25% of Democrats who voted for Obama, and nobody else can pull any, YOU do the math...
4 posted on
10/12/2015 5:25:30 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(Diseases desperate grown Are by desperate appliance relieved Or not at al)
To: dontreadthis
John McCain and Mitt Romney were most electable too.
5 posted on
10/12/2015 5:26:38 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
To: dontreadthis
But, but, but Fox News...
6 posted on
10/12/2015 5:26:51 AM PDT by
bray
(If Obama had a son he would be a cop killer.)
To: dontreadthis
¡Ay, caramba
9 posted on
10/12/2015 5:29:34 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Trump-Cruz 2016. Make America Great Again.)
To: dontreadthis
Now just watch the GOPe lower the BOOM on Trump. After last year’s Mississippi primaries, we now know they are even more vicious than the Democrats.
This could be fun. Or tragic.
10 posted on
10/12/2015 5:30:22 AM PDT by
Tupelo
(Honest men may go to Washington, but Honest men do not stay in Wahington.)
To: dontreadthis
Trump will carry the Republican base and most Independents but will also bring very significant support (i.e. "Reagan Democrats) from the other side. This is the stuff of which landslides are made.
No other GOP candidate can deliver that mandate. I'm not sure very much will change overall if we get elected the typical Republican (i.e. Rubio) in a squeaker. Most likely however, a Rubio will lose just like Mitt Romney before him. And as much as we love Ted Cruz here (and I like him too), he only appeals to the conservative base - which we all know will not be enough to carry a general election. Perhaps a Trump Administration will soften the path for a Ted Cruz later on. Cruz is only 44, he'll have other chances.
13 posted on
10/12/2015 5:34:10 AM PDT by
SamAdams76
(A businessman gets things done with own money. A politician takes money and gets nothing done.)
To: dontreadthis
18 posted on
10/12/2015 5:40:13 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Trump-Cruz 2016. Make America Great Again.)
To: dontreadthis
As abrasive as he is, Trump is by far the best choice for a few reasons:
1)He owes nothing, I say again nothing, to any special interest group nor will he since he is self-funded
2)Trump has the organizational skills and contacts to assemble a team that can turn America around on any issue--from a failed immigration policy to bringing back jobs from offshore
3)Trump is not afraid to confront the PC police, the whiners and Communists who infest every level of American society
We have had a bellyfull of 'professional' politicians who have made a career of laying in the public trough sideways and lapping up our hard-earned money as they make themselves wealthy by acting on inside information and creating legislation that is of personal benefit to them.
It's time to elect someone who has actually succeeded in the private sector.
22 posted on
10/12/2015 5:45:45 AM PDT by
jimbug
To: All
Just LOVE watching the media, pundits, and GOPe squirm!
To: dontreadthis
There is another electability related article on TheConservativeTreeHouse that is a good read titled ‘Ted Cruz - The Reality of The Situation’. Cruz supporters won’t like it because it discusses Cruz’s slim to none chance to win the general election. Winning the general election should be a concern of every primary voter. Trump has crossover support. No other candidate has that. THAT is a big reason Trump can win. I don’t see any candidate winning the general if the can’t appeal to some Independents and fed up Democrats.
To: dontreadthis
Had a chuckle watching CNN push the Dem debate this morning.
Commentator Julian Epstein (pro-Hillary) claimed that a recent poll showing Hillary in decline had a margin of error of — 10%!
==
10%??????
That would make nearly everyone in the country ‘inclusive’.
70 posted on
10/12/2015 7:00:24 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: dontreadthis
But, but, obey said Trump wouldn’t win and the msm has been saying for a week he was dropping out and didn’t have the numbers!!!!
Very suspicious of what caused this sudden change. The other foot is going to fall soon.
83 posted on
10/12/2015 9:05:21 AM PDT by
bgill
( CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: dontreadthis
Taking a look at the Republican Primary and Caucus rules for 2016, I do not think it is possible to stop Trump. The rules overwhelming favor a candidate that gets the plurality of the vote, especially the primary system. The establishment cooked up this system to engineer a victory for the establishment candidate believing that the outsider candidates would split the vote of the more conservative voters (see 2012 and 2008) and the single establishment candidate would get the plurality and win the great majority of delegates to the convention. This has backfired bigtime. Unless there is an earthshaking development or a Trump withdrawal, Trump is almost fore ordained to win the plurality of votes in any primary. With almost all the big states having primaries that do not permit any delegates to candidates who do not reach a threshold of 20% of the vote. It looks like Trump would gather almost all the delegates in those states. As polls stand right now it is possible that Carson, Rubio and Cruz could gather a few delegates but insubstantial compared to Trump. There are 34 or so primary states and they are mostly the big states. The non primary or caucus states are where the establishment had a better hand but those are the very states that more conservative republicans have the better hand. Stopping Trump is going to be almost impossible if he continues to lead the field in popularity.
85 posted on
10/12/2015 9:18:13 AM PDT by
brydic1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson