Heard her once on Laura Ingraham’s show and she was a NASTY PIECE OF WORK!!! And He’s an IDIOT!!! GOOD PAIR!
If McCarthy and Ellmers were democrats; this affair would be resume enhancers.
But because they are republicans - OMG! The Horror!
Has own FR Laz hit it yet
A powerful congressman having an affair???!!!
Oh, say it ain’t so.
This is why every single incumbent congress-schmuck must be turned out of office.
Only the voter can enforce term limits.
McCarthy is PERFECT for the job of Obama-toiletlicker,
to follow the Orange Drunk, because
HE, too, CAN BE CONTROLLED by the DNC and White Mosque.
Not only McCarthy’s character but his ability to be a leader is in question after his comments on Hillary and Benghazi. Either way, he is unqualified for the job of speaker.
This needs to get out, it could be the thing Obama’s cronies would hold over mccarthy in order to pull his strings like a puppet.
Bob Livingston...
Good riddance to McCarthy. Is this the best that the GOPe can muster?!
I don’t trust any of the people involved, including Charles C. Johnson.
And if its not true?
If you recall, Renee Elmers is the one who organized opposition to pro-life legislation.
From Wikipedia:
“Ellmer serves as the current chairwoman of the Republican Women’s Policy Committee.[28] In 2015, she led five other Republican women in opposing a bill banning abortion after 20 weeks.”
No, the correct answer is : So What?
Stop being alanskyed. This is RULE 4
Saul Alinsky’s Rules from Rules for Radicals
Saul Alinsky describes 24 rules in Rules for Radicals. Of those 24 rules, 13 are rules of “power tactics”:
1. “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.”
2. “Never go outside the experience of your people.”
3. “Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy.”
4. “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.”
5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”
6. “A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.”
7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”
8. “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”
9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”
10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”
11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.”
12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”
13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
The remaining 11 rules Alinsky describes are concerned with “the ethics of means and ends”:
1. “One’s concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with one’s personal interest in the issue … Accompanying this rule is the parallel one that one’s concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with one’s distance from the scene of conflict.”
2. “The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment.”
3. “In war the end justifies almost any means.”
4. “Judgment must be made in the context of the times in which the action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point.”
5. “Concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa.”
6. “The less important the end to be desired, the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluations of means.”
7. “Generally success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics.”
8. “The morality of a means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory.”
9. “Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition as being unethical.”
10. “You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments.”
11. “Goals must be phrased in general terms like ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,’ ‘Of the Common Welfare,’ ‘Pursuit of Happiness,’ or ‘Bread and Peace.’”
gotnews.com to Congresswoman Renee Ellmers: Sue us, you slut.
This is the kind of thing that can change things.
Electing anyone to power in DC is authorization to steal and F$&$ the American people. Some F and some S but anyway you cut it, we lose.
Cease and desist demand sent to a news organization? How silly is that?
.
Public figures have a tough row to hoe on cease and desist orders.
They have to prove it was malicious.
Looks like just news to me.