Posted on 10/02/2015 2:53:25 AM PDT by Biggirl
The modern man has no use for a gun. He doesnt own one, and he never will
.The modern man cries. He cries often. What will the modern man do when the Islamic State threat that he has ignored, denied, and dismissed as Islamophobia for so many years becomes undeniable reality staring him in the face? He will cry. He will cry often.
(Excerpt) Read more at jihadwatch.org ...
Long Title:
NY Times: Modern man has no use for a gun. He doesnt own one, and he never will .Modern man cries. He cries often.
Yes, let’s all just disarm , so the islamist savages can be the only ones that armed and we shall all be easy meat .
No thanks
The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.
“Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who do not.”
.....Or “plow for themselves yet keep a weary on those who do not.”
The "islamic state" wouldn't be such a problem if we didn't sell them guns in the first place. Or give them guns for free, as in this case.
As yourself why do we sell/give weapons to the lowest scum on earth and the enemies of civilization?
I’m 69. Daddy was an Army combat soldier in the Infantry in
WWII. - The Germans had allowed their Fuehrer to take away
their guns. - Daddy was raised in the country, having to
hunt in order for his family to eat (5 kids). Aim was good.
Out of basic, he was ready to “charge Hell with a bucket of
water”. - He felt some bit of sympathy for the ordinary
German soldier; but the officers he had zero respect for.
I was raised in “Realville” USA. I’m grateful.
Obviously the good man with the rifle is rendered impotent because he is a good man who honors the social compact and will not flaunt his country’s laws. As a result he is disarmed in exactly the places where these crazed zealots go to indiscriminately kill innocents, who choose these places precisely because they know they will encounter no resistance.
Go down the list of mass shootings. All or nearly all of them take place where guns are forbidden by law or custom (I am unsure about that racist who shot the church goers a few months back. These crazies go to schools because they know there will be no resistance. Or they go to movie theaters that they know have signs denying ccw permit holders entry. If these killers went to gun ranges, or large stores that permit permit holders they would be shot dead in their tracks. I know I am preaching to the choir here but “Gun Free Zones” are for all intents and purposes proving grounds for mass murderers - it shows what cowards they are, but we are also foolish to have these moronic laws. It is like putting a sign in front of your house that says “we have cash and jewels but no weapons. Please don’t rob us”.
The NYT thinks the modern man is a woman.
He's also rendered impotent because people are supplying his enemies with even better weapons.
Burglar. Come and get me. I want a frontier piercing, particularly in the head.
Modern neutered man has no use for a gun.
Now kindly STFU you silly faggot.
Do you know why I have a whole-house generator? Because I decided I needed one. Do you know why I have two, 1-1\2 ton hydraulic jacks? Because I decided I needed them.
I’ll decide what I need as regards firearms. The metrosexuals at the NYT can cry about it if that makes them feel better.
Is that areal islamic state picture? Looks likt their style.
How can the rest of us distance ourselves from these stupid people?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.