LMAO. Only a gay dude can get away with the stuff Milo writes.
This is tremendously evil and should not be pursued.
“I mean, look, I don’t mean to be rude, but most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads.”
In a nutshell, the explanation why marriage is between a man and a woman.
“feminists are terrified and calling for them to be banned”
Well, I was on the fence before but that settles it. If the feminists don’t like them, then sexbots must be a good thing!
I don’t know, the wifes best friend is gay, I have known him 20 years, he said the same thing.
If women didn’t have < expletive deleted > there’d be a bounty on them.
So, the author is a hate-filled homosexual with irrational disdain for women.
That helps put this tripe in perspective.
I yearn for the day homosexuals really ARE marginalized, so that we can go back to being a normal, rational country wherein the grownups hold the reigns of power.
Coward.
Get the robot 1st.
How will humans of either sex be able to pick up the scent(s) of their robotic objects of affection?
Not gonna waste my time reading the article, I wonder why in the excerpt he only discusses the issue of men having sex with robots................not to be tacky but, women, machines, decades.
After watching West World, Mrs. Chandler said, “I wouldn’t want to be the person who has to clean those (dance hall girl) robots.”
Women have had little battery powered sex robots in a nightstand drawer for decades.
With interchangeable parts.
Great line from the article:
The truth is, men get along okay without women, unlike women, who become shrieking, neurotic messes if they’re still single in their 30s.
And then men will be able to marry their robots. So, The Stepford Wives was a prophetic story, after all.
Except that the writer’s logic is flawed. If this type of technology is invented for men, what makes him think perfect male robots won’t be invented for women? Women will have their robots, too. Then both men and women will be pathetic, sad losers married to (or cohabitating with) nonliving objects.
The adoption of Sexbots will advance the arrival Sharia Law here by 100 years.
If a man says something In the forest, is he still wrong?
Everyone seems ot be espousing the virtues of relationships, but take an honest look around at married couples- watch the couple at the table across from you in an eatery- watch the woman going on and on and on about this that and the other thing, and watch the man with the blank look on his face, and the automated half-grin every 5 minutes to make it appear he’s listening- look at him eying the steak knife, and then his wrists, observe him as he looks around the eatery at other married men with an “I feel your pain, buddy” look on his face.
Notice that every 20 seconds or so he glances at her still full plate, and then his watch, then looks up at her with that 1/2 grin again as she says “Are you even listening to me?” (We men develop a keen sense of word association- where we listen for certain syllables, or catch phrses, knowing that IF we don’t respond, or make an effort to look interested, we’re in the dog house for the evening- the word ‘listening’ is just such a word- it’s like an alarm bell going off- We don’t hear anything else but the word ‘listening’)
Watch as the man ‘accidently’ spills his glass of beer on his trousers, and watch as the wife stops midsentence with a look of disgust on her face, and then as she looks back and forth for the waitress, and as she tells the waitress to wrap her meal up because her ‘idiot husband has spilled his beer again for the 5’th time this week’
Watch as the husband barely keeps himself from busting out laughing as he leaps to his feet and is running for the door.
Watch as h e sits in his Ford F-150 bouncing around In the cab as the music is blaring “American Woman” for the ‘5’th time this week’
How soon before these robots are available? (J/K)
