Posted on 09/12/2015 4:28:21 AM PDT by markomalley
Why didn’t he just give her a bad haircut. She’d never come back. Same thing with the bakery people. Just make a horrendously bad cake. let them eat “bad” cake!!
I had heard this reported in the last 24 hours as a woman demanding female-type hairstyling for which the shop did not even possess the equipment.
The last line of this story changes EVERYTHING.
She wanted a MAN’S haircut. Since the establishment does MEN’S haircuts, their refusal to cut her hair WAS unjustified.
If she had just said he was identifying as male that day, everything would have been perfectly fine.
Yeah, let’s get the government after any one who is male or white or both who does any thing others do everyday with impunity.
Here is the freaky woman in question: www.nydailynews.com/news/national/gentleman-barbers-fined-refusing-cut-woman-hair-article-1.2353089
Her FB page: https://www.facebook.com/Diamond.Lynn.Pecjak
It doesn’t change a damned thing. Stop the whining! What part of “we reserve the right to refuse service,” is the problem? If I drop my wife off at a women’s gym, I don’t expect I’ll be able to work out there. Business operations should not be decided by a spiteful person’s tantrums!
Ask them to leave the premises nicely, and then throw the pansies out on their ear. Free association means not associating as well. To hell with liberalism!
Unjustified, but IT SHOULDN’T BE AGAINST THE LAW.
That horse has already left the barn—when the Civil Rights movement went beyond getting rid of Jim Crow laws, which mandated discrimination and segregation, and insisted on prohibiting freedom of association on private property.
I get that, but what will he do if another woman comes in. Will he pay 750.00 for each woman not served?
Sing the national anthem and you are a serious liar. Land of the free? Home of the brave? Not anymore. Home of cowards who are afraid to face life without having other people controlled and robbed to satisfy their desires.
she's a lefty troublemaker, pure and simple. Anytime someone would rather get an establishment in trouble rather than go somewhere else for service, they're there simply to cause trouble to the establishment.
Just like the gay cake story. They were there just to stir up trouble, not to get a cake. They could have gotten it anywhere but that wasn't the narrative. They were after their crusade.
You are right. It seems if it had just been about gas stations, diners & motels and the like, that wold be fair. When it comes to cakes and haircuts, it is tyrannical foolishness.
Just like if some dude walks into a beauty parlor and wants a Brazilian wax.
I reject your Bruce Jenner can be Caitlin assertion that there can’t be separate sexes, in case you didn’t catch the sarcasm. Free association is a basic right, even in business.
Oh, and have fun working out at curves.
Because it would look like deliberate sabotage and they would be fined accordingly.
The solution here is to a cut that would be offered a man. No shampoos, no conditioners. Over the ears and short on back.
If they don’t want a cut according to how you can cut it, that’s ok.
“Why didn’t he just give her a bad haircut. She’d never come back. Same thing with the bakery people. Just make a horrendously bad cake. let them eat “bad” cake!!”
That should be the strategy, people need to get creative when dealing with ridiculous people.
That’s the solution for me...bad hair and bad cakes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.