Posted on 08/28/2015 7:06:55 AM PDT by McGruff
On Tuesday Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump held a press conference during a campaign stop in Dubuque, Iowa.
During the press conference Trump was heckled and interrupted by Univision reporter, Jorge Ramos
Jorge Ramos refused to wait his turn and refused to quit talking.
Trump had Ramos escorted from the room for his outburst.
Now we know that Ramos had been stalking Trump for weeks. He even spoke about “hunting” Trump in an earlier interview.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Ramos should never have been granted American citizenship for he has not a shred of loyalty to the United States. He should be stripped of it and deported to Mexico.
FYI, I despise Whorehey Ramos...but if he pays taxes on his income to the US government and whatever state he lives in, then it isn’t our concern what he does with it afterwards. He, like the rest of us, has every right to invest or spend his legally-earned and taxed money anywhere he’d like.
That said, his obligation is to report his worldwide income to the IRS, all of which is taxable here because he is a citizen (and this would be the case if he was merely a permanent resident). However, he would also be eligible for a tax credit on income earned outside of the US, with the credit being the lesser of the US tax or the (presumably) Mexican tax on said income. The guy is worth $200 million+, so I assume that he has good accountants...though if I were a betting man I’d place a wager on at least some shenanigans. I’d say that an audit is called for in this case.
As to the rest, I don’t know whether his role in Univision is that of merely being an employee/anchorman, or it is bigger than that. Even if he is a part owner, it doesn’t necessarily make him responsible for everything that the network does.
As mentioned, I despise the racialist, opportunistic, dishonest SOB...but even people such as him deserve a fair examination of their affairs, and the same right to do with their own money as we, ourselves, have.
Ramos should have been arrested for the stalking.
Anderson Cooper is from the Vanderbuilt family. In the 1930s they were the 6th richest family. Besides being from an oligarch family he worked for the cia. What a perfect tv anchor.
http://www.nndb.com/group/444/000127063/
the whole list (from the 1937 book, “America’s 60 Families”)
http://www.nndb.com/lists/439/000127058/
Megyn swallowed the bait up to the lead weight just like she swallowed the rape charge from 25 years earlier.
Pray America is waking
Ramos’s daughter works for Hillary’s campaign....and his financial ties to Univision reinforce his political leanings. Read on.
NY POST EXCERPT-—Univision recently trotted out Bill Clinton to talk to advertisers——as private equity owners of the debt-laden company sweat. Univision’s owners are hoping to launch the IPO in just weeks. Getting early commitments on ad spending from Madison Avenue would certainly make an IPO road show before potential investors that much easier....they hope to raise around $1 billion at a valuation of $20 billion, according to Reuters. (Univision has $9 billion in long-term debt.)
Mexican program provider Televisa also has an 8 percent stake.Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Deutsche Bank — the lead underwriters — are getting ready to gin up some sizzle for a not very sexy business: free-to-air .
THE BIG BURRITO-—HILLARY/BILL CLINTON MEDIA CONNECTION-—Latino-TV Univision owner, Haim Saban described his formula to influence American politics: make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets. (WIKI)
WIKI—Saban became involved in politics in the mid-1990s when he felt that support for Israel was slipping in the United States.[5] Saban has been a generous and consistent donor to the United States Democratic Party according to his mandatory Federal Election Commission filings.
Mother Jones, in an analysis of the major donors to the campaigns of 1998 election cycle, ranked Saban 155th among individual donors.[23] Amy Paris noted that Saban’s Clinton-era “generosity did not go unrewarded. During the Clinton administration, the entertainment executive served on the President’s Export Council, advising the White House on trade issues.”[23]
The New York Times reported that Haim and his wife “slept in the White House several times during President Clinton’s two terms.” Saban remains close friends with the former President. Clinton described Saban as a “very good friend and supporter.”[5] Saban contributed between $5 million to $10 million to the William J. Clinton Foundation.[24]
During the 2000 presidential election, Saban increased his rank to 5th among individual donors with a combined contribution of $1,250,500.[23] Matthew Yglesias wrote that “Saban was the largest overall contributor to the Democratic National Committee during the 2001–2002 cycle.” [25] Saban’s donations during that 2001–2002 period exceeded $10 million, the largest donation the DNC has received from a single source up to that time.
In September 2004, Hillary Clinton described Saban as a very good friend, supporter and adviser: “I am grateful for his commitment to Israel, to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East and to my foundation’s work, particularly on reconciliation issues.”[5] In May 2007, Haim publicly declared his support for Clinton in 2008 presidential election.[20]
In June 2007, Saban and Steven Spielberg co-hosted a Hillary Clinton fundraiser at the house of Peter Chernin, the President of News Corporation.[26] According to the Los Angeles Times,[26] the fundraiser brought in over $850,000.
In March 2008, Saban was among a group of major Jewish donors to sign a letter to Democratic Party house leader Nancy Pelosi warning her to “keep out of the Democratic presidential primaries.”[27] The donors, who “were strong supporters of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton presidential campaign”, “were incensed by a March 16 interview in which Pelosi said that party ‘superdelegates’ should heed the will of the majority in selecting a candidate.”[27] The letter to Pelosi stated the donors “have been strong supporters of the DCCC” and implied, according to The Jewish Telegraphic Agency,[27] that Pelosi could lose their financial support in important upcoming congressional elections.
On May 19, 2008, it was reported that Haim Saban had “offered $1 million to the Young Democrats of America during a phone conversation in which he also pressed for the organization’s two uncommitted superdelegates to endorse the New York Democrat.”[28]
Saban, a long-time supporter and donor of many pro-Jewish and Israel causes, has stated his main goal in multiple interviews: “I’m a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel.”[38]
Haim Saban touts himself as a worldwide pioneer and leader in the entertainment industry. He is the Chairman and CEO of Saban Capital Group, Inc.
THIS IS SABAN’S BUSINESS WEB SITE http://www.saban.com/html/team/saban.html
ANOTHER SURPRISE Hillary fanatic Haim Saban’s non-profit...”The Saban Center”.....subsidized a 34-page white paper titled, “Pathway to Coexistence: A New U.S. Policy toward Iran.” NO CONCIDENCE The paper essentially forecasted Obama’s approach to dealing with Iran: (1) the largely hands-off approach to Iran’s bloody 2009 Green Revolution, and, (2) the present-day compromises on its nuclear program.
The ties between the Clintons and Spanish TV television network-—UNIVISION-—run deep. Univision’s newscasts gleefully bash Republicans and praise Hillary’s newly-minted position on immigration. Network Owner Haim Saban’s unabashed support for Hillarys election effort segued into a partnership between Univision and the Clinton Family Foundation. Offended by his remarks, Univision dumped Trump’s Miss USA competition-—was aired on Reelz cable.
Agreed that Whorehey is a tool of the reconquistas, and that he was reading from a script. Here’s my reaction:
Yeah, he has a right to ask questions...and so do others. In a press conference called by someone else, THEY control the agenda, and THEY decide who gets to ask them a question, and when. Further, even though you have the right to (rudely) cut others off and shout whatever you’d like, the person that you are shouting at has a similar right to tell you to sit down and shut up. Beyond that, if you are disrupting someone else’s event, they have the right to eject you to restore some semblance of order.
As for having rights as an immigrant (vs. those of a citizen) - eh, not so much. The rights of a citizen include ALL of the right of a LEGAL immigrant (and Whoregay is one, like it or not), but also include others. That he even MENTIONED that is a complete tip-off as to his agenda (not that anyone with 2 fully functional neurons had any doubts about that to begin with, but I’m just thought that I’d point that out).
This guy is a complete sleezebag; dishonest and rude only begin to cover it. The fact that he cut in line to shout at Trump and cause him trouble is an exact analogy to what illegals do - cut the line and cause trouble for their host nation. Trump’s reaction was, IMHO, pretty much perfect - he told him to stop, repeatedly, and when he didn’t then Ramos got shown the door...pretty much what I expect from the Trump Administration starting in about 17 months.
You are a regular WMD of information. Keep up the good work.
Thank you (blush).
Trump showed who had more class, tact and intelligence. After having that rude loudmouthed racist ejected from his ebent, Trump graciously allowed him back in and even called on him to allow him to ask his question.
I think this clown actually thinks of himself as being some kind of freaky “Dos Equis guy”. What a moron.
Same as FOX planned ahead of time to go after Trump. He’s scaring a lot of people. That’s a good thing.
Cabron, te puedes imaginar que sucederia si un reportero de la TV Americana fuese a Mejico a confrontar el mayor candidato para la precidencia de Mejico?
Te llamas ciudadano Americano, pero no eres un hilo mas honesto que los "ciudadanos Americanos" musulmanos.
Regresa a tu pequeno charco, y, en las famosas palabras de alguien que verdaderament tiene mucho valor, porque no te callas?
Ramos is part of the Chicanos dream to create Aztlan, a Mexican nation covering all the American South West, his declared loyalty is to Mexico not the U.S.
When Ramos open his mouth to attack U.S. immigration laws, we must remind him that Mexico has one of the most draconian immigrations laws in the world.
“Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the US look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem.” (Center for Security Policy ^ | April 13, 2006 | J. Michael Waller)
To solve our immigration crisis U.S. should adopt the Mexican immigration laws, probably the most draconian in the world.
Mexico’s Ideal Immigration Law—Let’s try it here at home
Center for Security
Policy ^ | April 13, 2006 | J. Michael Waller
Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for our Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill.
That’s too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the US look at
how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem.
Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are: in the country legally; have the means to sustain themselves economically; not destined to be burdens on society; of economic and social benefit to society; of good character and have no criminal records; and contributors to the general well-being of the nation.
The law also ensures that: immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor foreign visitors do not violate their visa status; foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics; foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported; foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported; those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.
Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense.
The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens – and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, illegal and illegal. Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country’s immigration policy.
It is an interesting law – and one that should cause us all to ask, Why is our great southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent?
If the United States adopted the law, Mexico no doubt would denounce it as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry.
We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. Now let’s look at Mexico’s main immigration law.
Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society: Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)
Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic or national
interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)
Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country: Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
A National Population Registry keeps track of “every single individual who comprises the population of the country,” and verifies each individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86) A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).
Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:
Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article116)
Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned:
Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121).
Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico – such as working with out a permit – can also be imprisoned.
Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says, “A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.” (Article 123)
Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article125)
Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty
or security” will be deported. (Article 126)
Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:
A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the countryis subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)
All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American immigration is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government’s agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States.
Let’s call Mexico’s bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy. Let’s propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own law as a model.
I am sure Mexicans would be proud that the U.S. copy their more enlightened laws.
Except for one minor detail.
The Supreme Court itself can act unconstitutionally, and the Congress is the Constitutional final word as regards to citizenship. Which they have neglected to ENACT.
Just check out the illegalities of the SC during reconstruction...
Congress can solve this problem, and put the Court in its place by very simple action. Why haven't they?
For the simple reason that they are mostly criminal imbeciles existing on lust for power, re-election, and the Citizens of the country be damned.
In addition to the "natural Born" issue, the Congress can also define clearly the conditions under which "naturalization" is revoked for clearly fraudulent oaths of citizenship. They can call it the "JORGE RAMOS FRAUDULENT CITIZENSHIP REVOCATION ACT OF 2016" *
DON'T LET THE DOOR HIT YOU ON THE BUTT.... j
*This would also be, as a much needed bonus, the solution to all of the "naturalized" agents of radical islam, and their budding terrorist issue now living in the United States.
Reminds me of the old cold war days when the Soviet Union trained spies to live in America and infiltrate strategic institutions.
Tell us more about his daughter. I never knew anything about the POS, much less his daughter.
But now I realize that I should.
Perhaps I am being unduly influenced by the current book I am reading, History of the Spanish Conquest of Yucatan and of the Itzas..." which, among other things, is replete with stuff like this...
"In 1555 the Lacandones and Puchutla put to death the good Dominican missionary, Fray Domingo de Vico. From that time there was a constantly growing wish on the part of the Spaniards [in Mexico] to conquer those people, not only because they were not Christians and ate human flesh, but because they were a constant menace..."
Mind you, this while the King of Spain at the time absolutely by royal order to the monks and administrators in Mexico to refrain totally from armed persuasion.
Corgi Ramos.
Highly likely. He was on Hannity a week or so before the Trump charade that appears to be a practice run. He was reading from the same script, "you can't….you can't…etc", never pausing to allow a retort.
Then on The Kelly Fail he took a completely different tack, seeking an alliance, acting like they were compadres battling the same beast. Kelly kept him at arms length, feigning devil's advocate with half-hearted 'Trumps side' arguments. Pretty clear Ramos is a kids size mexican train wreck no one wants to get near.
Sounds like he's got a bad case of Montezuma's revenge.
LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.