Skip to comments.
GERMAN SCIENTISTS PROVE GÖDEL’S (Mathematical) PROOF FOR GOD’S EXISTENCE IS CORRECT
Assist News ^
| August 9, 2015
| Brian Nixon
Posted on 08/11/2015 6:03:41 AM PDT by xzins
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
1
posted on
08/11/2015 6:03:41 AM PDT
by
xzins
To: All; betty boop; Alamo-Girl
Mathematical purity has also been said to be proof of an ordered universe
2
posted on
08/11/2015 6:04:37 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Don't let others pay your share; reject Freep-a-Fare! Donate-https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: xzins
3
posted on
08/11/2015 6:06:53 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: xzins
I thought that Anselm was the guy who popularized this argument. Am I wrong?
4
posted on
08/11/2015 6:09:46 AM PDT
by
Fai Mao
(Genius at Large)
To: MrB
5
posted on
08/11/2015 6:11:34 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Don't let others pay your share; reject Freep-a-Fare! Donate-https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Fai Mao
Perhaps the argument, but not the math
6
posted on
08/11/2015 6:12:14 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Don't let others pay your share; reject Freep-a-Fare! Donate-https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: xzins
Much easier to read, but even with an engineering degree, I need a bit more explanation of the proof.
7
posted on
08/11/2015 6:13:09 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: xzins
I like the Ontological argument It is the only one that unbelievers can’t really handle.
8
posted on
08/11/2015 6:14:19 AM PDT
by
Fai Mao
(Genius at Large)
To: MrB
I haven’t seen a posting of the German proof yet. If you see it, post it.
9
posted on
08/11/2015 6:16:06 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Don't let others pay your share; reject Freep-a-Fare! Donate-https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: xzins
Proof that Germans exist?
I think that’s just accepted.
10
posted on
08/11/2015 6:20:14 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: xzins
> Mathematical purity has also been said to be proof of an ordered universe
I believe in God but from a devil’s advocate point of view couldn’t the definition of “order” be a man-made construct based on his observations of symmetry thus the “proof “ of an “ordered” universe would be based on a false premise?
To: jsanders2001
^ meant to add “and patterns”
To: onedoug
To: xzins
14
posted on
08/11/2015 6:27:10 AM PDT
by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: MrB
15
posted on
08/11/2015 6:28:01 AM PDT
by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: xzins
The ontological argument is invalid, and will always be invalid.
As St. Thomas said: The existence of God is self-evident to God, BUT NOT TO US.
I think it’s remarkable that St. Anselm is famous primarily for an invalid argument for the existence of God, and the monstrous “satisfaction theory.” But I hear he was good to his mother.
To: xzins
Mathematical purity has also been said to be proof of an ordered universe.Math Induction gets you to a greater being whose full extent is unknowable to us.
17
posted on
08/11/2015 6:30:47 AM PDT
by
grania
To: xzins
Wow, this is interesting. Psalms 2 supports this and the following...
1. the heathen rage (muslims, tribal, nutty liberals, etc.)
2. people imagine a vain thing (normal people)
3. kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder , and cast away their cords from us.
This shows that the leaders and elite of the earth KNOW that the Biblical God IS GOD. But they want to cut the chords.
18
posted on
08/11/2015 6:33:03 AM PDT
by
Jan_Sobieski
(Sanctification)
To: xzins
For more information on Gödel I recommend three works that are both enjoyable and fairly approachable: ... and Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Ethernal Golden Braid by Douglas Hofstadter.
I tried to read Hofstader’s book in the early 1980s. It's pretty deep, and I admit I didn't finish it. Reminds me of Hawking's A Brief History of Time in that many people bought it, some people talked about it, but (I suspect) very few people read it all the way through to the end.
To: jsanders2001
. . .but from a devils advocate point of view couldnt the definition of order be a man-made construct based on his observations of symmetry thus the proof of an ordered universe would be based on a false premise?
20
posted on
08/11/2015 6:34:40 AM PDT
by
McBuff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson