Posted on 08/10/2015 6:54:41 PM PDT by Hojczyk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTouMjCiAbU
Little girl, dirty mind horsesh*it.
No ambush? My understanding is that they have been bragging about how the three of them worked together in writing the questions. I guess it could be argued that Kelly was the only one of the three who was smart enough to realize that what they were doing was risky, but they all participated. And, they are all adults.
Did it look to you like they wanted Trump to talk about policy issues or personal issues? What do you think they wanted the public to hear from Trump?
You may not have liked that question but that’s the kind of feminist crap charges that the Left throws at Trump and our side in general. He was given a chance to answer those charges, and answer them he definitely did.
Rosie is a woman. So what? Are you a moron?
I heard that, but it wasn’t good journalism...she did not give the who, what, when, where, why in her story. It was her opinion only.
It would interfere with The Donald saving Hillary’s fat from the fire.
Well hey, the election will be over in 2016 but the bitchiness and huge ego of Megayn will live on forever. This is the woman who thinks she prepares politicians to take on Putin. She could NOT be more full of herself. End of this story was Roger Ailes called Trump! It’s all on his facebook page! Come Back Donald! We’ll Treat you fair! Last Laugh is the amazing polls and the angry responses to Fox News on their obvious bias against the front-runner of this republican party! Hello!!
She’ll continue doing her *job* “without fear, or favor”.....riiiiiiight MeGyn.
Her “job” is c@ckteasing. And Ailes knows it.
>> “What do you think they wanted the public to hear from Trump?” <<
.
They wanted Trump to attack them, which would please the viewers, and raise their ratings.
They knew what they were doing. They should have known the risks. They crapped out and it's their own fault. The same goes for Luntz.
Is it too late for them to get Dick Morris to come back and cover for them? He could handle all their shows.
What is Fox going to do now if it wants to provide credible coverage of this election?
she was there to be a debate moderator....
An advocate journalist is players on the field..
A debate moderator is and umpires between the players..at most they put the ball in play with a straight up toss for all players...
Her attacks on Trump wound be appropriate for one of the candidates and an it would be appropriate for Trump to attack back
She trying to have it both way... below the belt sucker punch then say no hitting back
..if your want to be a player you cant be the one also ruling on the calls ....that's like having someone that prosecuting you also be the judge in the same trial
I thought they asked him policy questions after that. But I could be wrong. Not the first time.
That was a stupid thing to say by her. Wonder if CNN will pay more or less than fox?
It sounded to me like Ailes suggested she do something, and she declined.
That’s one hard she-male. I’ll bet she could cut diamonds on those cheekbones.
I think she means “gotcha journalism”
They've been bragging about how hard they worked to develop those questions. That's when I quit watching.
Now, again, Brett and Wallace might not be bright enough to understand how all this was going to look. But, if you watch the way Kelly asked her questions, you will notice her enthusiasm. She knew what she was doing and she knew that the plan was to destroy one of the candidates. She must have known the risks.
Yes, and she was "looking daggers" too!
   |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.