Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Did Armies Keep Archers Supplied With Arrows While Fighting?
Slate ^ | July 27, 2015 | By Stephen Tempest

Posted on 07/30/2015 11:19:03 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

During the Hundred Years' War, England had a centralized, state-controlled organization for manufacturing arrows in bulk. These were then issued as required to the soldiers on campaign.

In June 1413, for example, Henry V appointed Nicholas Mynot to be “keeper of the king's arrows,” based in the Tower of London. Mynot was responsible for making arrows, but the royal fletchers alone could not supply the total need, so additional orders were placed with outside suppliers. In August 1413, for example, London-based fletcher Stephen Seler was paid for 12,000 arrows.

We have some total figures available. In 1418, Henry V's government purchased 150,000 arrows; in 1421, it acquired nearly 500,000. Several years' supply would be stockpiled for a major campaign. Half a century earlier in 1360, Edward III's accounts reveal that 566,400 arrows (and 11,000 bows) were stored in the Tower of London alone.

It's possible some archers brought their own arrows. People who were foresters or hunters (or bandits) in civilian life would be accustomed to supplying their own needs and might prefer arrows whose length and weight was better suited to the draw weight of their bow than the standard government-issue arrows. . .

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: a2; archery; arms; arrow; arrows; bowandarrow; godsgravesglyphs; henryv; hundredyearswar; longbow; longbowmen; middleages; militaryhistory; nicholasmynot; recycling; renaissance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: vladimir998
A friend of mine, a Civil War buff, speculated that units of archers could have played a role on the 1860’s battlefield. He said trained archers could put out a higher rate—6 to 8 arrows per minute—of fire than infantry armed with Springfield or Enfield rifled muskets—2 to 3 rounds per minute. Of course the riflemen would have a great advantage in range over the bowmen who might well be limited to fighting from defensive positions, firing indirectly in volleys at masses of attackers. Just saying.
41 posted on 07/30/2015 12:08:32 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

Most arrows designed for war were barbed at the back of the arrowhead, to prevent people from easily pulling them out.


42 posted on 07/30/2015 12:09:22 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

The length and spine of the arrow depended on the weight and draw of the bow, but I guess accuracy was secondary to flight volume like smooth bore muskets versus rifled long arms.


43 posted on 07/30/2015 12:11:11 PM PDT by ZULU (Democrats are paleosocialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Bump for Samurai Jack reference!


44 posted on 07/30/2015 12:12:13 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The world map will be quite different come 20 January 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

I’ve never seen that kind of rapid fire from a bow. Another great archer is Byron Ferguson, who can hit a tossed aspirin with his longbow. Lots of videos online demonstrating his skills.


45 posted on 07/30/2015 12:12:18 PM PDT by dainbramaged (Get out of my country now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Mongols used arrows quite literally by the millions.


46 posted on 07/30/2015 12:16:08 PM PDT by zek157
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

47 posted on 07/30/2015 12:18:06 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panzerkamphwageneinz

If they had all been liberals, then the arrows would have been tipped with suction cups.

—rim shot—


48 posted on 07/30/2015 12:18:47 PM PDT by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Nothing came close to the Mongol rate of sustained fire and accuracy for 600 centuries.


49 posted on 07/30/2015 12:21:19 PM PDT by zek157
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

50 posted on 07/30/2015 12:22:33 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

ACME ARROW COMPANY, same place Wyle B. Coyote got his!


51 posted on 07/30/2015 12:22:39 PM PDT by GOYAKLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dainbramaged

rapid fire ... see 47


52 posted on 07/30/2015 12:24:10 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: GOYAKLA
I think I see your point


53 posted on 07/30/2015 12:27:11 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: AzSteven

I recall reading Greek and Roman slingers used to carve insults on their lead sling bullets.

Freegards


54 posted on 07/30/2015 12:28:00 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
In August 1413, for example, London-based fletcher Stephen Seler was paid for 12,000 arrows.

And of course, there is still a great London Fletcher with us today:


55 posted on 07/30/2015 12:31:13 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u
Any idea how many arrows were used at Agincourt?

Best estimate I've seen is 8000 archers, and the standard was each carried 24 arrows. So somewhere approaching 200,000 arrows. Estimates of the French force vary wildly, but averaging them out you get something along the lines of 25,000. So 8 British arrows for every Frenchman, and 20 for every dead Frenchman.

Incidentally, if you ever want to read a good book, John Keegan's THE FACE OF BATTLE compares the experience of battle at Agincourt, Waterloo and the Somme.

56 posted on 07/30/2015 12:34:11 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels."--Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: zek157

Maximum
Rounds
Down
Range...

Wins every time.


57 posted on 07/30/2015 12:35:56 PM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
You are assuming the French fired back ...

Heh. Heh. They pulled their already used arrows from the backs of the French.

58 posted on 07/30/2015 12:36:44 PM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

I guess I should have put joke in parentheses after my comment.


59 posted on 07/30/2015 12:40:58 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: zek157

[Nothing came close to the Mongol rate of sustained fire and accuracy for 600 centuries.]

And often from the back of a moving horse.


60 posted on 07/30/2015 1:11:32 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson