Posted on 07/24/2015 1:02:18 PM PDT by markomalley
The Department of Justice has apparently backtracked from an earlier statement saying that they had received a criminal referral into Hillary Clinton‘s email account from inspector generals in the State Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
The New York Times reported that, “Two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state…”
“A Justice Department official confirmed the department received a criminal referral but gave no other details,” Reuter’s Jonathan Allen reported. But the DoJ walked back that statement later in the afternoon, clarifying that the referral was not criminal in nature.
The confirmation-turned-contradiction of the Times is sure to inflame the heated debate surrounding the allegations contained in the piece. The article had already been edited under pressure from the Clinton campaign, infuriating liberal and conservative journalists alike.
Huma makes a few calls problem solved.
The Obama justice department.
That is all.
Well, that was quick !
LOL! Anyone surprised? Even though she violated ALL the rules, regs and requirements, none of it was really ‘illegal’. You know. Long time ago, what diff now....
BTW, does the Constitution prevent someone serving time in federal prison from running for the presidency? Hillary wants to know.
No....no....no.....
Giving away our nation’s secrets is nooooooo problem at all.
She is writing a new book...
IT TAKES A TRAITOR
Hillary reminded barky of what kind of shiite she has on him, so the NDOJ is covering for her now.
Ambassador Stevens was unavailable for comment.
Whatever happened just now to get them to backtrack was criminal, guaranteed.
There should be a criminal inquiry into many of the activities of the DOJ.
Meanwhile, the “Justice” Department announces an investigation into the pro-life activists who exposed Planned Parenthood’s baby part business.
Right. Since when was giving Secret if not Top Secret documents to your uncleared lawyer for safekeeping a crime?
I’m guessing but I would bet that the answer is in the timeframe of WW1.
Covering up for Hillary.
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
To: Nachum
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3316159/posts
Maybe this is why 0 is trying to limit the IG’s powers.
16 posted on by WildHighlander57
It would be the IG’s, not the DOI”j”, that determines whether the inquiry they initated is criminal or not.
The 0 DOI”j” is a criminal enterprise.
Criminal is the Justice Department saying it is not criminal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.