Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary: I'm 'examining' Obamacare's Cadillac tax
Politico ^ | July 16, 2015 | By Danny Vinik

Posted on 07/16/2015 1:26:24 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

In her highly anticipated speech on the economy Monday, Hillary Clinton was heavy on rhetoric and short on specifics, promising to reveal her actual policy proposals in the weeks ahead.

But this week, she also dropped a not-so-subtle hint about a big one.

In a questionnaire for the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), which endorsed her this week, Clinton noted that the so-called “Cadillac tax” levied under Obamacare is one area she is “examining.”

The Cadillac Tax is a surcharge on expensive health care plans. It’s a crucial provision of Obamacare, bringing in much-needed revenue and trying to curb the incentive for employers to offer outlandish insurance plans to their workers. But it doesn’t kick in until 2018, so it’s going to be the next president’s problem.

If Clinton opposes it, she’ll be running against nearly every U.S. health policy expert and the White House. They all see it as clunky but necessary to reduce health care costs.

But politically, fighting the Cadillac tax is a winner. Republicans hate it because it increases revenue and is simply part of Obamacare. And unions object to it because they often negotiate generous health plans in lieu of higher take-home pay. It’s no wonder that — as POLITICO’s Brian Faler reported in a deep look at the topic in April — the Cadillac tax is shaping up to be the next big Obamacare fight.

Clinton didn’t say exactly what she’d do, but in her response to the AFT questionnaire, she began to stake out a position. “As currently structured,” Clinton wrote, “I worry that it may create an incentive to substantially lower the value of the benefits package and shift more and more costs to consumers.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; hillary; hillaryclinton; obamacare; tax; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 07/16/2015 1:26:24 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

“...highly anticipated...” ?

I know I was on the edge of my chair.


2 posted on 07/16/2015 1:28:07 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Hillary: I'm 'examining' Obamacare's Cadillac tax

Would someone tell her its not a tax on her limo.

3 posted on 07/16/2015 1:28:57 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

She’s mostly examining a bottle of Old Overholt


4 posted on 07/16/2015 1:30:02 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Stop me if you heard this before...

6 months after her election she will hold a press conference saying that she worked night and day since her election and cannot find anyway to cut that tax. Then she will announce that she will instruct the IRS to make it retroactive to 2013.


5 posted on 07/16/2015 1:31:05 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

“Her speech”...That’s all she does, is give speeches. Meanwhile people like Cruz and Trump have given about 9 billion interviews since they announced.


6 posted on 07/16/2015 1:31:28 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (B. Hussein Obama: 19 acts of Treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
It’s a crucial provision of Obamacare, bringing in much-needed revenue and trying to curb the incentive for employers to offer outlandish insurance plans to their workers.

Now there's a sentence loaded with BS.

What in the world would make what was previously seen simply as complete coverage to be now viewed as 'outlandish?'. And even if such a thing existed, why would it be in the public interest to stop it?

If you are trying to curb something, you can't also be trying to get 'much-needed' revenue. If you are successful at the first, you must fail at the later.

7 posted on 07/16/2015 1:31:59 PM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I can’t possibly see how this witch can survive the next 15 months campaigning no matter how much the wackos support her. Eventually she is going to have to submit to a hard question interview and then do debates. Eventually she will be exposed, and calling her crimes all a “right wing conspiracy” just ain’t going to fly for those entire 15 months. If that passes muster with the voters then this country is already finished.


8 posted on 07/16/2015 1:34:30 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (B. Hussein Obama: 19 acts of Treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
trying to curb the incentive for employers to offer outlandish insurance plans to their workers

Notice how easily this rolls off the reporter's pen. The idea that some worker benefits are "outlandish" and need to be curbed so that the government regulates exactly what everyone gets. No one gets too little and, God Forbid, no one gets too much. A generous benefit plan is "outlandish" and needs to be curbed. Unless, of course, you're Hillary seeking support of the unions who want outlandish benefit plans and then its perfectly OK. Look for Hillary's fix to be to simply exempt her union supporters or any company that donates enough to her.

9 posted on 07/16/2015 1:35:33 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

I will refuse census answers because the idiots in Washington are incompetent in protecting our data.


10 posted on 07/16/2015 1:37:06 PM PDT by WENDLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

If I’m not mistaken, if the CDILLAC TAX GOES, SO DOES oBAMACARE. So YOU GO GIRL!

Hillary will have zero coattails in the election (or are those pantsuit tails). So House and Senate still likely Republican. She won’t be able to do diddly/squat.


11 posted on 07/16/2015 1:39:46 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Got to pander to the union segment.

Make sure all special interests are greased up prior to the election.


12 posted on 07/16/2015 1:39:53 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

She wont wait 6 months. 2 months or less.


13 posted on 07/16/2015 1:41:34 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

What a phony.


14 posted on 07/16/2015 1:41:47 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

If this woman were taken to task by the media in the same what people on the right are, she would survive 24 hours politically.

It’s an insult to the nation and humanity at large, that it is pretended in any way that she is qualified to be president.

She is an evil vile excuse for a human being.


15 posted on 07/16/2015 1:43:47 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Whatever Hillary. You are pathetic.

Keep talking


16 posted on 07/16/2015 1:44:12 PM PDT by MAKOTHEDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

“nearly every U.S. health policy expert and the White House. They all see it as clunky but necessary to reduce health care costs.”

Every US health policy expert means only the ones that the writer agrees with. The ones that disagree with the writer, doesnt exist to him.


17 posted on 07/16/2015 1:44:13 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

This is 100% Hillary pandering to union government employees who want to keep their massive benefits untaxed.


18 posted on 07/16/2015 1:45:24 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

Wife and I escorted the census taker off our property and warned him we’d call the sheriff if he returned.


19 posted on 07/16/2015 1:48:18 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
...the wackos support her...

It's a great majority of our female population that supports her. Her. What % of blacks voted for the black guy?

To emotionalize (because logic & reason won't do it on Venus) our women away from Hillary toward a conservative will take...what?

20 posted on 07/16/2015 1:49:54 PM PDT by polymuser ( Enough is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson