Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should Congress Abolish the Federal Debt Limit?
Real Time Ec onomics ^ | Jul 10, 2015 | Nick Timiraos

Posted on 07/14/2015 3:57:37 AM PDT by expat_panama

The U.S. Treasury has been using emergency measures to avoid breaching the federal borrowing limit since March. 

Is it time to ditch the debt ceiling?

The Government Accountability Office raises that question in a new report that both quantifies the damage caused by past episodes of debt-ceiling brinksmanship and offers Congress with possible ways out.

The report is particularly relevant right now because the U.S. Treasury has been using emergency measures to avoid breaching the federal borrowing limit since March. Budget analysts estimate that it can use those measures, such as halting certain pension investments, until it is unable to borrow money sometime in November or December.

Raising the debt ceiling doesn’t approve more spending by the government. Instead, it allows the government to borrow to pay debts it has already incurred....

{snip}

The GAO puts forward three options to replace the debt limit:

• Congress could instead agree to raise the debt limit as part of the annual process of passing a joint budget resolution. This would force Congress to agree to pay the bills when it decides to spend money on things, limiting the potential for market disruptions.

• Congress could provide the executive branch with the authority to raise the debt limit on its own while reserving the power to stop the increase by passing a joint resolution.

• Congress could do away with the debt limit altogether, giving the executive branch broader power to borrow in order to pay for spending already approved by the Congress. This would mirror the arrangement used in New Zealand and the United Kingdom.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: debt; economy; investing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: USCG SimTech

No - but the people we voted for gave the man-boy Barry a $20trillion line of credit ( the debt clock froze at above $18 trilion 2 months ago and no one even commented)

Hey boehner what time is happy hour?


21 posted on 07/14/2015 6:08:18 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

All I hear is one dumb@ss idea after the next coming out of the media every day.

The fact that this is even being considered is insane.

It will make our money worthless.

What a DUMB idea!


22 posted on 07/14/2015 6:12:55 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Moonracer; WayneS; DoodleDawg; RFEngineer
Why not? They never fail to increase it when they hit the old one anyway.

Who knew?

why not do away with the charade?

That's one of the biggest "no-limit" arguments, but there's still a lot to be said for the "kabuki theater", imho it keeps everything in the spot light so folks are made to face the reality of what's happening.  I'm ok w/ an increasing debt, as long as it lags the growth of a bigger America with more people, more wealth, and more income.

23 posted on 07/14/2015 6:37:34 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

Cut spending? Now that is WAY beyond “extraordinary measures.” That’s off in looney bin territory.


24 posted on 07/14/2015 6:42:52 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

Yeah! Let’s be more greek!


25 posted on 07/14/2015 6:58:41 AM PDT by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

Might as well, they don’t do anything with it except extend it.


26 posted on 07/14/2015 7:00:07 AM PDT by discostu (In fact funk's as old as dirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

” I’m ok w/ an increasing debt, as long as it lags the growth of a bigger America with more people, more wealth, and more income. “

If you run up debt during bad times shouldn’t you pay it back down during good times? Reload for the future.


27 posted on 07/14/2015 8:37:09 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
If you run up debt during bad times shouldn’t you pay it back down during good times?

That's exactly the policy the United States began with when John Adams established America's first embassy in Holland for the sole purpose of borrowing to finance the revolution.  We ran up such a huge debt that for the first and only time the U.S. had to seriously weigh the option of default.  What happened next is that we not only paid the debt but we proceeded to run up a surplus.

The question now is whether America is enjoying good times or suffering bad times.  mho is that we're enjoying good times that should be a lot better, so we need to wind way back the rate of debt growth and then let the debt increase along w/ the size of the economy.

28 posted on 07/14/2015 9:23:36 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

Abolish the FED, and the debt limit is ‘no longer a problem’. MUCH harder to spend into infinity when you can’t just print funny $$...and take us one more step back to our Constitutional founding.


29 posted on 07/14/2015 10:36:42 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS; Chode

The only thing a BBA would give us: more slavery.

It does NOTHING to fix the root problems: unconstitutional Fed, unconstitutional entitlements....unconstitutional GOVT. In D.C. speak ‘balanced’ = more taxes, year after year for vote buying.

Nobody wants to bring down the house of cards. No politician in the ring today will answer the simplest of question “By what authority?”. If they’d have to site ‘for what’ their taxes/fees were FOR, it’d show what a fraud the whole system has become

SS/welfare? unconstitutional
HCare? unconstitutional
School? unconstitutional
EPA/TSA? unconstitutional
etc.

I’m still reading my copy to see where the 5th, 9th, 10th and 13th have been superseded for ANY of the above....Never have known a CLAUSE to negate the whole.


30 posted on 07/14/2015 10:47:07 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

“I’m ok w/ an increasing debt, as long as it lags the growth of a bigger America with more people, more wealth, and more income. “

We haven’t had that for a long, long time.

I remember hearing “deficits don’t matter” from the first Bush administration, and cringing.

Guess what....they matter, they always mattered, and so does our total debt matter.

It matters so much that they will simply increase the debt limit ad nauseum - and will not ever stop until, of course, they can’t do anything else but stop.

That will be a bad day, all because nobody in Congress has an ounce of Pro-America honesty. Not one Democrat, not one Republican.


31 posted on 07/14/2015 11:33:19 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
haven’t had that for a long, long time.

Measuring years by saying "long, long time" works great in Star Wars but when it comes to managing money adults that pay for the movie tickets need times and dates. 

From 1970 to the '08 election the debt/gdp averaged 34%.   Right before the '08 election it was 35% and when Reagan left office it was 39%. 

Right now it's 74%. Let's think together. Putting Bush debt in the same box as today's debt is what Occupy-Wall-Street drops on a cop car. We got twice the debt burden we had w/ Reagan & Bush. There is no repeat no comparison.

32 posted on 07/14/2015 1:02:22 PM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

they should just have the printing presses feed it straight into the fire


33 posted on 07/14/2015 2:43:35 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

“Measuring years by saying “long, long time” works great in Star Wars but when it comes to managing money adults that pay for the movie tickets need times and dates. “

Cute.

Well if we want to talk about adults, then we have to talk about the bond market. From 1980-ish (after the Carter spike) to 2008 it was a manufactured decline - nobody cared because you could (if you were big enough) game the difference between the long and short gov’t debt and make money all day long, until it all went to “zero”

If we are all adults talking here, we have the future entitlement books that have to be considered.

If we are adults we have to consider all of these things.

Fiscal Sanity and Solvency was indeed a long long time ago and seemingly in a galaxy far away practiced by an alien species that speaks a different language than we do now.

The prosperity we’ve experienced since the 80’s was indeed somewhat manufactured. Now we (like Greece) have to decide if we are going to be a real country of adults who build things, and have a government we can afford, and a population that primarily works at productive endeavors.

Again, we haven’t been that for a long, long time, Obie-wan. The difference, no matter how you choose to measure it, is debt that has to be paid off, and GDP that is fake and getting more fake every year.

So our debt is much bigger, and our “real” GDP (ex gov intervention) is much smaller than you are led to believe.

But adults should be able to face reality, shouldn’t we?


34 posted on 07/14/2015 2:52:01 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
...need times and dates. “

Cute.

Ooops! That's as far as I got 'cause somehow we got off on the wrong track and went from arguing to quarrelling.  That's super easy to do with chats about the economy, the subject is passionate, and rightly so as a messed up economy causes unspeakable suffering and there's no need for it.

Life's too short and while I'd love to somehow salvage our convo my supper's on and by the time I get back on FR some other disaster will probably be monopolizing our focus.  In the meantime do have a good evening and hopefully we can steer our thinking more carefully next time.  Cheers!

35 posted on 07/14/2015 4:16:33 PM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

Friend....I appreciate spirited debate in all it’s forms and take nothing personally, nor do I see it as a quarrel.

One can look at the cold war spending and provide some justification for it, even though in hindsight perhaps not as much as we thought.

However, since the cold war, any measure that includes “debt” in the numerator or “GDP” in the denominator is misleading (and lots of people are mislead).

The difference between the fiction of debt/GDP and (debt+future entitlements) / GDP_Adjusted_to_reality is measured in 100’s of percent. So much to make even Obamas government spending binge statistically irrelevant.

I think that is something we can both agree on.


36 posted on 07/14/2015 4:50:46 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson