Skip to comments.
Tenth Circuit Court Of Appeals Rules Against Guns
gunalizer.com ^
| 6/27/2015
| RRangel
Posted on 06/28/2015 8:35:07 AM PDT by rktman
It appears that, until the nations highest court decides to protect the expressly enumerated Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms as strongly as it does non-enumerated rights like gay marriage and abortion, law-abiding American gun owners are simply left to watch lower courts unravel the Constitution and our fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms in decisions like Bonidy.
(Excerpt) Read more at gunalizer.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 10thcircuit; 10thcircus; 2a; 2ndamendment; banglist; guncontrol; secondamendment; tenthcircuit; tenthcircus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Uh, srsly? Is there anybody out there that thinks the scotus will treat the 2nd amendment the same as they have whichever amendment it that okays gay marriage? Any hands raised out there in the peanut gallery? No? Guess we're realists huh.
1
posted on
06/28/2015 8:35:07 AM PDT
by
rktman
To: rktman
The US Constitution is no longer worth the 200 year old paper it is printed on.
2
posted on
06/28/2015 8:37:42 AM PDT
by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(I demand a Constitutional Amendment establishing Marriage as one man and one woman.)
To: rktman
The only positive to this is that there probably won’t be any post office parking lots soon.
Lousy, stupid decision. No faith in SCOTUS, they are either in bed with socialism willingly or by some sort of force.
3
posted on
06/28/2015 8:38:36 AM PDT
by
M1911A1
To: rktman
ve whichever amendment it that okays gay marriage?..
whichever amendment is that?
4
posted on
06/28/2015 8:38:39 AM PDT
by
Sasparilla
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
To: rktman
The Supreme Court has just demonstrated that straight-forward language presents no obstacle to a pre-planned contra ruling.
5
posted on
06/28/2015 8:40:14 AM PDT
by
odawg
To: Sasparilla
Still lookin’......no findee yet. :>}
6
posted on
06/28/2015 8:42:25 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
To: rktman
As of now, this edict only “applies” to unfortunate
States In the 10th Circuit.
Libs are emboldened. Look for a quick trip to SCOTUS.
Are fringe lunatic liberals looking for a flash point of some kind?
7
posted on
06/28/2015 8:43:27 AM PDT
by
Sasparilla
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
To: rktman
One opinion on the gay rights law dissent opinions was that it legalized concealed carry in all states by the same principle that gay marage became legal on all stated.
8
posted on
06/28/2015 8:50:28 AM PDT
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: rktman
District of Colorado.District of Kansas.District of New Mexico.Eastern District of Oklahoma.Northern District of Oklahoma.Western District of Oklahoma.District of Utah.District of Wyoming.
I think this will be the eventual SCOTUS case where the Court will vastly overreach in nullifying the Second Amendment. Based on this week’s events, Bye Bye Heller, McDonald, and the rest.
9
posted on
06/28/2015 8:53:37 AM PDT
by
Sasparilla
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
We’ve exhausted the first three boxes of our four box system. You know what’s next.
10
posted on
06/28/2015 8:55:35 AM PDT
by
Noumenon
(Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
To: Sasparilla
--
Bye Bye Heller ...--
This decision was enabled by Heller, and depending on how one construes "sensitive places," is dictated by Heller.
The logic in Heller includes a part where long-standing bans are constitutional (regardless of any consideration other than "long standing" - this was done to protect the NFA 1930's and GCA 1968), unless they work to prevent possession of a working firearm in your own home.
11
posted on
06/28/2015 8:59:24 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Sasparilla
“Are fringe lunatic liberals looking for a flash point of some kind?”
I don’t know, but the 2nd Amendment is one such for many in this country.
12
posted on
06/28/2015 8:59:57 AM PDT
by
Forty-Niner
(The barely bare berry bear formerly known as Arctos Horribilis.)
To: Forty-Niner; Sasparilla
Look no further than CT and NY when they passed draconian anti-2nd Amendment laws and the response by many of the gun owners affected...
They refused to comply...rightfully and intelligently so.
BLOAT
13
posted on
06/28/2015 9:02:37 AM PDT
by
SZonian
(Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
To: rktman
We have known this for years if not decades. Let them come.
μολὼν λαβέ
The second A doesn't protect my librty to bear arms. My arms do that themselves. Let them try. Let them get started and they will quickly find they have bit off quite a bit more than they can chew. I would not want to be in Law Enforcement on that day. Probably a good day to call in sick.
14
posted on
06/28/2015 9:04:12 AM PDT
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
To: Sasparilla
Most likely 180 from the gay marriage thing. Probably rule that possession of firearms is only valid if you belong to your states national guard. Otherwise, like difi said, turn ‘em in mr and mrs America.
16
posted on
06/28/2015 9:10:17 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
To: wastoute
17
posted on
06/28/2015 9:10:21 AM PDT
by
semaj
(Audentes fortuna juvat: Fortune favors the bold. Be Bold FRiends.)
To: Sasparilla
i’ve never paid the post office here in Utah the slighest attention,and never will. the gun stays in the glove box, period.
18
posted on
06/28/2015 9:11:00 AM PDT
by
telstar12.5
(...always bring gunships to a gun fight...)
To: CedarDave; leapfrog0202; Santa Fe_Conservative; DesertDreamer; OneWingedShark; CougarGA7; ...
NM ping. (Since we are in the 10th’s jurisdiction.)
Gonna be ‘interesting’ to watch them try to actually enforce it here.
To: rktman
Judicial activism is a cancer on our republic and must be excised. Mark Levin has outlined the process and the cure. Get behind him and promote his ideas to your representatives and let’s cure this before we die of it.
20
posted on
06/28/2015 9:17:55 AM PDT
by
Ben Mugged
(The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson