Here, SCOTUS preens and bows before Obama (ex parte)
even as the case against him --YEARS ago-- was before them.
The ex parte litigant thanked them by making them EXEMPT.
This is a way of providing one side or the other a legitimate case against this court ruling.
They SHOULD recuse themselves, but like Kagan in the Obamacare mess, they will not. No Leftist Will admit they are biased.......ever.
Unless they rule against gay marriage, of course. Then it was all kosher.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
the fix has been in for a while now
I have no hopes left for this
Both of them should recuse themselves. However, neither of them will because they lack professionalism, ethics, and honesty.
Kagan and Sotomayor should have been recused from the ObamaCare case.
We must all learn that our laws don’t apply to liberal supreme court justices.
Arrogance. Liberal arrogance. They just know that they are smarter than everyone else.
We sit with anticipation, hands held out, waiting for 5 reprobates proclaim or withhold their blessing on our expressed will. How many people voted to define marriage? How many people have tried to redefine it? We don’t have to put up with this.
relevant repost.....
a compromise would be for the court to rule that marriage is between a man and a woman but that states could allow formal cohabitation contracts among two individuals that put the matter of property ownership, joint taxes, child adoption and a host of other. such an arrangement would be similar to a partnership agreement or LLC corporation
The Marxists on the Supreme Court should never have been allowed on it for they took an oath to the Constitution which they are ejecting (unconstitutionally).
How evil these Marxists are to allow the promotion of vice and welfare (socialism) to be promoted in our “Justice” System which is based on ...” the Laws of Nature and nature’s God”.
They are creating Rule of Man-—ejecting Rule of Law (Higher Laws (God”s) for the Marxist and Muslim one which believes sodomizing other-—the vile dehumanizing act of vice-—is a “Natural” “Right” from God.
It is a learned, pagan behavior from child abuse and neglect-—like all of history proves, and the Afghani boy harems prove. Forcing Tribal ethics on ust is to destroy our Christian Ethics and all Traditions (destroy Traditions for our irrational Utopia which these elitists are planning FOR US (NWO)-—Remove Natural Law Theory (Right Reason/Scince/Truth/God) from the basis of our “Justice” (virtue) System so we are ALL Slaves of the arbitrary (unconstitutional) State.
Pure evil-—to force the muslim, pagan irrational utopianism of Marx....where all biological connections are destroyed so babies can be bought and sold and ALL their ideas are programmed from the State..
These Marxists are forcing Marxist (irrational) Gender Theory down our throats——LITERALLY. They are the Ethics of Satan and Stalin. and antithetical to the Constitution (Null and Void).
Am I the only one that remembers Joe Miller?
They don’t care. They know no one will impeach them.
Regardless of their ruling those SOB’s need to be on camera when performing their official duties. Shame, shame on the highest court of the land hiding in secrecy from it’s citizens.
Interesting,Thanks xzins.
Let’s say that the Supreme Court decides that each state can decide for itself about gay marriage. So if Justices Kagan and Ginsburg performed gay marriages where it was decided to be legal, and I don’t know, then their actions may not be as bad as people think.
Regardless of PC, pro-gay interpretations of the 14th Amendment’s equal protections clause, the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay marriage. So it remains that the states are free to make 10th Amendment-protected laws which prohibit constitutionally unprotected gay marriage imo.
Nevertheless, I’m bracing myself to be disappointed by pro-gay activist, state sovereignty-ignoring justices concerning gay marriage.
Rules don’t mean anything anymore.
Government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed. I worry about how quickly and how thoroughly FedGov could lose that consent, but I also worry how far they will go if there is no overt response to notify those who see themselves as our ruling class that they have lost that consent.