Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Historic Decision: Sikh Turban victory against U.S. Army
Sikh Siyasat News ^ | 06/25/2015 | Sikh Siyasat Bureau

Posted on 06/13/2015 10:46:10 AM PDT by aimhigh

A federal court ruled yesterday that a Sikh college student must be allowed to enroll in Army ROTC without shaving his beard, cutting his hair, or removing his turban.

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson acted in the case of Hofstra University student Iknoor Singh, who had been barred by the U.S. Army from enrolling in the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) program because of his religious practices. The Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) is a college-based program for training commissioned officers of the United States Armed Forces.

(Excerpt) Read more at sikhsiyasat.net ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 2bad; adiosamerica; army; borderslanguage; culture; death2ameica; rotc; sikh; turban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 06/13/2015 10:46:10 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

Case brought to court by the ACLU, as usual.


2 posted on 06/13/2015 10:47:25 AM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

Good deal. We can use all the Sikhs we can get. Truly ferocious fighters and they do not like islamists at all.

L


3 posted on 06/13/2015 10:47:55 AM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

This is got nothing to do with religious practices. It is all about uniformity and sealing the protective mask. Doesn’t work with a beard.


4 posted on 06/13/2015 10:48:29 AM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
Sikh's kick ass. Would love to have more in our military.


5 posted on 06/13/2015 10:49:17 AM PDT by icwhatudo (Low taxes and less spending in Sodom and Gomorrah is not my idea of a conservative victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

Considering the allout perversion our military is being subjected to, the Sikh turban issue is tame by comparison.


6 posted on 06/13/2015 10:50:35 AM PDT by TADSLOS (A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

The fags in the courts took us through this commie bull**** back in the 70s. Sometimes I really have to wonder if everyone in the judicial system in this country might be severely retarded. They sure do act that way.


7 posted on 06/13/2015 10:50:37 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Without God there would be no science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Those and gurkhas


8 posted on 06/13/2015 10:50:51 AM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

When the Brits finish the purge of thier Gurkas we can use them too.


9 posted on 06/13/2015 10:51:30 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

We all understand that Sikh’s are trusted allies. The issue is simple, you vacant Constitutional protections once you enter into the Military. No other organization is like it and should be kept as much.


10 posted on 06/13/2015 10:55:11 AM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Can’t wear gas masks, chemical suits, or firefighting equipment.


11 posted on 06/13/2015 10:55:22 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Good deal.

Long-term, I wonder. because this ruling - if it stands - will be applied to other dress issues as well. So why not allow hijabs? And burqas?

Contrary to the old liberal slogan, there is not always strength in diversity.

12 posted on 06/13/2015 11:02:54 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Agreed. There’s a reason all those 1930’s movies about the British Raj and the wars over the Khyber Pass showed His Majesty’s units in turbans and beards. The British could trust Sikhs in their fight against marauding Afghan hill tribes. And Indira Ghandi was stupid enough to trust hers after ordering the assault on the Golden Temple.


13 posted on 06/13/2015 11:03:37 AM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
On June 17, 2010, President Obama nominated Jackson to fill a vacant seat on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia that was created by the transition to senior status in 2007 by Judge Gladys Kessler.[4][5] Her nomination lapsed at the end of 2010, but Obama renominated her on January 5, 2011. The United States Senate confirmed Jackson in a 97-0 vote on March 17, 2011.[6] She received her commission on March 18, 2011.[7]
14 posted on 06/13/2015 11:10:24 AM PDT by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

The next President needs to tap Newt Gingrich to form a Judicial oversight task force and start submitting recommendations for impeachments of judges to Congress.


15 posted on 06/13/2015 11:42:02 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dila813
Can’t wear gas masks, chemical suits, or firefighting equipment.

IOW, he'll be a burden. Slippery slope. What passes will be given next week?

16 posted on 06/13/2015 12:01:21 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Bull, this is exactly the kind of activism, and multi-culturalism, and hat and hair diversity, the military doesn’t need.


17 posted on 06/13/2015 12:04:20 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: katana

Sure, the British fighting man was superior to the Sikh, just as the American fighting man can do just fine without bearded and turbaned Sikh and Muslim guys from detroit and El Paso, doing their political activism against our military.

Since when do conservatives praise these activist groups?


18 posted on 06/13/2015 12:09:37 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Well, you currently have about 3 of them serving, but I’m not aware of them being superior to the people who beat them as warriors.

Reagan was correct to forbid their nonsense.


19 posted on 06/13/2015 12:14:36 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

This is truly Breaking News as it seems to have broke 12 days in the future.


20 posted on 06/13/2015 12:29:32 PM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson