Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aimhigh

Good deal. We can use all the Sikhs we can get. Truly ferocious fighters and they do not like islamists at all.

L


3 posted on 06/13/2015 10:47:55 AM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

Can’t wear gas masks, chemical suits, or firefighting equipment.


11 posted on 06/13/2015 10:55:22 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
Good deal.

Long-term, I wonder. because this ruling - if it stands - will be applied to other dress issues as well. So why not allow hijabs? And burqas?

Contrary to the old liberal slogan, there is not always strength in diversity.

12 posted on 06/13/2015 11:02:54 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Agreed. There’s a reason all those 1930’s movies about the British Raj and the wars over the Khyber Pass showed His Majesty’s units in turbans and beards. The British could trust Sikhs in their fight against marauding Afghan hill tribes. And Indira Ghandi was stupid enough to trust hers after ordering the assault on the Golden Temple.


13 posted on 06/13/2015 11:03:37 AM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Bull, this is exactly the kind of activism, and multi-culturalism, and hat and hair diversity, the military doesn’t need.


17 posted on 06/13/2015 12:04:20 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson