Skip to comments.
Mitt's new mission. (Hand-pick the nominee with Adelson)
Politico ^
| 06/13/2015
| Alex Isenstadt
Posted on 06/13/2015 7:59:12 AM PDT by GIdget2004
Mitt Romney is working with an unlikely collaborator Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire casino mogul who bankrolled Newt Gingrichs 2012 campaign in the hopes of ensuring that the GOP primary produces a mainstream conservative without any of the mayhem that marked his own race.
The two, who speak monthly, aim to convince the wealthy contributors bankrolling various candidates to work together to avoid the kind of primary election chaos that Romney believes laid the seeds for his defeat in 2012. The former Massachusetts governor is also considering endorsing a candidate to achieve his goal.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016election; mitt; uniparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: KC_Lion
Problem #1 is giving too many delegates to states which will never vote GOP in November. Seriously, the opinion of Wyoming is far more valuable than the opinion of Massachusetts.
Delegates should be awarded on the following formula:
- No more than 20% based on their electoral votes.
- 20% based on things such as GOP governors, senators, congress critters and control of state legislatures.
- At least 60% based on actual ability to deliver electoral votes to the GOP in the last five or six election cycles.
Want more delegates? If your state does reasonably well in #1 and #2, but stinks in #3, then adopt a congressional district awarding system like Maine and Nebraska do rather than winner-take-all. Pennsylvania is a prime example.
21
posted on
06/13/2015 8:36:09 AM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: ansel12
Why do you think Willard was breaking his neck to get the GOP to have their convention in Utah ???
To: GIdget2004
‘.. without any of the mayhem that marked his own race.”
ie, eliminate competition.
23
posted on
06/13/2015 8:38:51 AM PDT
by
Rennes Templar
(NSA: The only government agency that really listens.)
To: Cicero
The two guys who screwed up the last election were Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich, who stayed in the race just long enough to edge out the other conservatives, and then dropped out of the primaries and gave it to Romney. Who effectively dropped out of the election and gave it to the gay Muslim illegal alien Communist. Fred Thompson did that fan dance last too followed by Romney's "RINO swan dive" in the general election.
24
posted on
06/13/2015 8:43:46 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by government regulation.)
To: Vigilanteman; cripplecreek; Jane Long; 2ndDivisionVet; Norm Lenhart; TADSLOS
I maintain that the First Two GOP primary states should be the ones who had the Highest Percentage of Population and the Highest Raw Number of GOP Votes in the Last Presidential Election.
You would then get a much better gauge of the actual Grassroots GOP choice of Candidates.
Not the ones the Wizards of Smart think would make The Best Roman Consul. >:(
25
posted on
06/13/2015 8:51:59 AM PDT
by
KC_Lion
(PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! G-d bless you all!)
To: KC_Lion
You want California to be one of the first two GOP primary states?
26
posted on
06/13/2015 9:07:30 AM PDT
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: KC_Lion
Sorry. California is actually worth less than Wyoming in GOP calculus because Wyoming actually and consistently delivers electoral votes to the GOP candidate in November.
My formula isn't totally heartless, though, as it would award a minimum number of delegates based on electoral votes which would make California worth as much as, say, a Georgia or the two Carolinas. And that's REALLY stretching its value.
27
posted on
06/13/2015 9:16:14 AM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: BenLurkin
The non-conservative always use a qualifier like, pragmatic conservative , or compassionate conservative.
28
posted on
06/13/2015 9:18:33 AM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: GIdget2004
“primary election chaos”
In other words, when the establishment speaks, that settles the issue.
29
posted on
06/13/2015 9:21:43 AM PDT
by
SharpRightTurn
(White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
To: GIdget2004
It about amnesty.
It’s all about amnesty.
The RNC must produce an amnesty candidate for The Cheap Labor Express.
They want us to vote to give away our country to fraudulently documented foreigners.
30
posted on
06/13/2015 9:22:34 AM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: GIdget2004
Romney + Adelson—what could possibly go wrong?
31
posted on
06/13/2015 9:23:59 AM PDT
by
SharpRightTurn
(White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
To: GIdget2004
The former Massachusetts governor is also considering endorsing a candidate to achieve his goal.LOL
This POS is like a vampire.
32
posted on
06/13/2015 9:25:59 AM PDT
by
Rome2000
(SMASH THE CPUSA)
To: KC_Lion; stephenjohnbanker; BlackElk; Finny; Windflier; TADSLOS
You know, I get the funny feeling told people that empowering liberal Republicans, Mitt in particular, was a REALLY bad idea. Not only did he lose, just as predicted, but he was emboldened to keep pushing the GOP leftward.
Now I can’t remember who it was that said that. IIRC there were several people here on FR that did, but it’s...fuzzy somehow. All I know is that those guys were right. Oh sure it MASSIVELY pisses off the leftists here that still scream in his defense to this day. But those guys were right.
I wish I could remember who it was...
To: cripplecreek
This should get interesting.
Mitt and Sheldon can say all they want, but at the end of the day as a lot of men know if the wife ain’t happy then no one is happy in the house.
Sheldon’s wife likes Ted Cruz and most likely her canidate of choice.
To: Norm Lenhart
Romney steering the GOP leftward. I always thought that was a given.
35
posted on
06/13/2015 10:30:09 AM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
To: GIdget2004
Helping Hillary for 2016, just like he helped in 2008 and 2012.
To: GIdget2004
This is Politico, so take it with a grain of salt.
I think Graham is going after the Adelson $$$. Against online gambling. For perpetual war.
37
posted on
06/13/2015 11:28:10 AM PDT
by
Forgotten Amendments
(Peace On Earth! Purity of Essence! McCain/Ripper 2016)
To: TADSLOS
Thats because unlike a lot of people here, you ‘think’.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson