To: Vigilanteman; cripplecreek; Jane Long; 2ndDivisionVet; Norm Lenhart; TADSLOS
I maintain that the First Two GOP primary states should be the ones who had the Highest Percentage of Population and the Highest Raw Number of GOP Votes in the Last Presidential Election.
You would then get a much better gauge of the actual Grassroots GOP choice of Candidates.
Not the ones the Wizards of Smart think would make The Best Roman Consul. >:(
25 posted on
06/13/2015 8:51:59 AM PDT by
KC_Lion
(PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! G-d bless you all!)
To: KC_Lion
You want California to be one of the first two GOP primary states?
26 posted on
06/13/2015 9:07:30 AM PDT by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: KC_Lion
Sorry. California is actually worth less than Wyoming in GOP calculus because Wyoming actually and consistently delivers electoral votes to the GOP candidate in November.
My formula isn't totally heartless, though, as it would award a minimum number of delegates based on electoral votes which would make California worth as much as, say, a Georgia or the two Carolinas. And that's REALLY stretching its value.
27 posted on
06/13/2015 9:16:14 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson