If God’s purpose was to prevent another Hitler, why didn’t He just kill the first Hitler when he was a child?
Post of the day!
A complete rebuttal of Robertson.
I wish that the church and TV preachers would just stick to the basics of:
Jesus being born of a virgin, living a sinless life, being the propitiation for our sins, dying on the cross, being buried, rising from the dead on the third day and coming back again and leave alone the following:
1.) Leave the eternal conditional security doctrine alone, 2.) lave the unconditional eternal security doctrine alone, too, 3.) leave the health/wealth doctrines out of the pulpit as well, and just tell people that works will not save, either, but that we accept Jesus, do our best as we walk in the Spirit, and leave our eternal fate in His hands.
Hitler would have been just an underemployed loser were it not for those gigantic forces in the world which caused the horror of the 1914-1918 Great War. In its aftermath, to use the phrase, power was lying about in the streets to be picked up by those ready to exploit it.
That was Russia in 1917 & Germany in 1932. Hitler saw his chance and he took it.
Anyway, it was horribly insensitive for Robertson to tell a grieving mother that her departed child might have been a force for evil. Disgusting, in fact.