Posted on 06/10/2015 10:04:58 AM PDT by Kaslin
Lavrenti Beria, who ran Josef Stalin’s KGB, once commented on the ease with which the feared organization he headed could convict any individual at will: “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime.” But that was early 20th Century Soviet Union, and this is 21st Century America, you might say; we have all manner of procedural safeguards in place to guard against individuals being charged and convicted of things not truly evil or harmful to others. Ahh, were it so.
Just how easy is it in 21st Century America to run afoul of one or more of the many thousands of federal criminal offenses on the books? Just ask Former Speaker Denny Hastert, now under federal indictment for nothing more egregious or harmful to our nation’s well-being than trying to conceal from prying eyes payments of his own money to another individual, and then not telling the FBI what it wanted him to reveal in order to incriminate himself.
Many of these criminal offenses have been on the books for decades -- some conceived at the same time as our Internal Revenue Code a full century ago; others the offspring of the “War on Drugs” in the late 1960s. However, the zeal with which Uncle Sam’s agents target individuals who seek nothing more than to keep certain personal activities private, has become pronounced in recent years.
We live in a world in which the federal government not only makes it nearly impossible to engage in any private financial transaction, but actually resents the person – to the point of making them a felon -- who dares try to evade revealing to federal regulators and investigators what they are doing with every red cent of their own money.
From the massive, NSA-directed meta-data collection programs revealed two years ago by Edward Snowden, to the FBI’s continuing efforts to outlaw any encryption of electronic data by individuals or companies to which the federal government is not given the keys, America’s landscape is peppered with legal landmines set for people and businesses trying to keep a small part of their world private.
Guilt is now presumed from simply taking steps to avoid government’s prying electronic eyes.
The Hastert indictment is clear evidence of this alarming trend. The former Speaker faces a decade or more in federal prison, but not for allegedly committing any substantive criminal offense. Even if he eventually is acquitted, Hastert’s reputation already is ruined simply because he wanted private transactions to remain private; and because he elected not to incriminate himself when answering questions put to him by FBI agents.
As The Atlantic’s Connor Friedersdorf writes, Hastert is but the latest in a growing list of Americans “being prosecuted for the crime of evading federal government surveillance.”
One does not have to possess the standing of a former Speaker of the House of Representatives to earn such attention from Uncle Sam. Last July, Lyndon McLellan, a convenience store owner in North Carolina, had his life-savings of $107,702.66 confiscated by the IRS for violating one of the same financial reporting laws that ensnared Hastert. For simply trying to reduce the paperwork burden on his bank with regard to certain transactions relating to his savings, McLellan was forced to mount a long and costly legal fight in order to see his money again.
The use of tightly crafted and clearly defined financial laws can in fact provide legitimate tools with which federal prosecutors are able to strike at “real” criminals engaged in activities that seriously harm other people. However, contemporary financial regulatory powers go far beyond what could be considered reasonable weapons with which to prosecute, convict and imprison such individuals.
For example, most individuals do not know that if you engage in a financial transaction considered “suspicious” by an employee at a federally-insured financial institution, the employee is required to report that transaction to federal investigators. These Suspicious Activity Reports or “SARs” are mandated in addition to other federal paperwork, such as “CTRs” or Currency Transaction Reports, which must be filed by anyone depositing or withdrawing more than $10,000 cash at a bank.
Many of these financial reporting laws have been broadened considerably since 9-11; and almost all have criminal penalties attached to them. But they are only the tip of the “gotcha iceberg” with which the federal government can control individuals and businesses. As noted criminal defense lawyer Harvey Silverglate concluded in his 2009 book, Three Felonies a Day – How the Feds Target the Innocent, it has become virtually impossible for even the most intelligent and learned individuals to, “predict with any reasonable assurance whether a wide range of seemingly ordinary activities might be regarded by federal prosecutors as felonies.”
So, before jumping to any conclusions about Denny Hastert, consider for a moment just how easy it would be for any of us to suddenly find ourselves similarly charged, for wanting nothing more than to keep certain personal financial actions private from Big Brother.
It could just as easily be a young teen girl being used to set up a heterosexual man who is thinking with the wrong head.
This Unnerving C-SPAN Call to Dennis Hastert Makes His Indictment Quite Interesting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1miAo9bCK0E
Just wait until they get rid of physical cash and go all electronic.
LOL. Uh, yeah. What you said.
Many of these criminal offenses have been on the books for decades -- some conceived at the same time as our Internal Revenue Code a full century ago; others the offspring of the “War on Drugs” in the late 1960s. However, the zeal with which Uncle Sam’s agents target individuals who seek nothing more than to keep certain personal activities private, has become pronounced in recent years.
We live in a world in which the federal government not only makes it nearly impossible to engage in any private financial transaction, but actually resents the person – to the point of making them a felon -- who dares try to evade revealing to federal regulators and investigators what they are doing with every red cent of their own money.
Actions defined as crimes have proliferated to the point that the average American now inadvertently commits an estimated three felonies a day.
-- from the thread Criminalizing America
I would agree....let him have the just punishment of the deal. But I’d also turn around and get the amount used set by a judge, then hand it to the IRS folks to go after the blackmail guy on tax evasion. By the time, he pays off his lawyers and IRS, with fines.....he’ll have a quarter of the original amount in his hand, and be quiet well known as the gay friend of Dennys (not a great reputation if you ask me).
The supposed “procedural safeguards” that SHOULD have shielded Dennis Hastert to some degree have been pretty much eroded, and while what happened long in the past was reprehensible, that was not the snare that was used to entrap him. Something suitably vague, like “lying to the FBI”, a cover that is conveniently overlooked when dealing with mischief by a political figure of the “protected class” (i.e., someone of liberal Democrat connections), and which is only capriciously applied, if and when an “unperson” has to be removed from the scene.
One could apply the same standard to Herself, Madame Benghazi, the Cold & Joyless, but nobody has the testicular fortitude to even attempt that degree of even-handed application of the statutes.
Freepers: The Hastert story is not about Hastert. It is about the media. It is about the media’s creation of news. It is about Hillary and Bengazi, etc.
Don’t take the bait. Whatever the merits of the Hastert issue, the real story is that your local radio, television, and newspaper news editors are pulling this manufactured story off the wire services and running it at the top of every hour, at 5:30, and on the front page.
Dennis Hastert is a former high school teacher who spent a couple of decades in Washington, earned something on the order of $125,000 per year in one of the nation's most expensive metropolitan areas, and was a multi-millionaire when he retired from Congress ... to the point where he was apparently willing to pay $3.5 million to cover up an old crime that was no legal threat to him at all.
Good riddance to a Beltway scumbag by way of Illinois.
The oligarchy running the world now does not allow men and women to reach positions of power unless they have ‘things’ to fill pup the blackmail file. Look at the void-of-character Roberts soiling the bench in the subPreme Court!
Agree about Roberts.... the question is why did Bush appoint him? Was there no conservative judge or lawyer with a decent background to appoint? Robert’s past could not have been that difficult to discover. It makes no sense.
That's how the con was sold - and the anti-drug zealots swallowed it hook, line, and sinker.
They already have all the other politicians in these traps.Its the only thing that explains their behavior
Mention the name Gary Studds to them.
Yep. When Rush keeps repeating that he’s being prosecuted simply for “taking his own money out of his own bank account and giving it to someone” I get a bit annoyed. Had he not molested a boy, there wouldn’t be any need to pay a blackmailer.
The second amendment represents the ultimate recourse for injustice.
Just sayin’.
Why isn’t the blackmailer in prison?
See Post #7. I suspect the $3.5M payments had nothing to do with blackmail, and the “hush money” story is a cover for the fact that the payments were being made for some other reason.
My guess is that no one cares, the powers that be don’t care about destroying the blackmailer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.