Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/02/2015 1:43:48 PM PDT by Biggirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Biggirl

So how long until a similar lawsuit is filed against Hooters?


30 posted on 06/02/2015 1:59:42 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Biggirl

Cause Victoria’s Secret wasn’t hiring??


32 posted on 06/02/2015 2:00:43 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Biggirl

Been awhile since I first read about this case, did she even wear the headscarf to the interview?


33 posted on 06/02/2015 2:01:14 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Biggirl

It is all about incrementally forcing Sharia on all of us until we are enslaved to the Muslims.


34 posted on 06/02/2015 2:02:05 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (A free society canÂ’t let the parameters of its speech be set by murderous extremists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Biggirl

Why would a gay couple want a cake from a committed Christian baker?


35 posted on 06/02/2015 2:03:41 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (ISIS: Islam's Reformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

I thought discrimination was legal based on appearance. don’t they hiring young, fit healthy model looking people to sell clothes? hooters does the same thing. if you don’t look a certain way, you don’t get the job.


38 posted on 06/02/2015 2:10:14 PM PDT by snowstorm12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Biggirl

To be able to promote Sharia?


39 posted on 06/02/2015 2:19:51 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Biggirl
Justice Antonin Scalia said of the 8-1 ruling, “This is really easy”

What the hell is wrong with these guys? I was expecting a 5-4 decision, and was even surprised that they might go that far. 8-1, with Scalia leading? Good grief.

I'm not an A&F fan. In the old days, they used to be a high-class British clothing shop. I got my raincoats there, and I remember my mother-in-law had one of their folding stools for shooting pheasants. Then suddenly they went berserk, and now I cross the street rather than walk past their window.

But they still have a right to set limits to what their clerks wear, unless they agreed to something different to begin with--which they evidently didn't.

40 posted on 06/02/2015 2:20:23 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Biggirl

didnt follow the full story, but since she NEVER MENTIONED THE RELIGIOUS ASPECT OF THE RAG ON HER HEAD wouldn’t the store appeal and win .... ??????? hey my religion says i should leave my fly open.. how about that ...??????? FREE WILLY


43 posted on 06/02/2015 2:25:12 PM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Biggirl

Will Muslims apply for jobs at Hooters? Playboy? Why not? If they can force companies to allow Muslims to wear their Muslim clothes, why not force other businesses to allow Muslim women to wear their potato sacks?


46 posted on 06/02/2015 2:31:37 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Biggirl

Well there ya go. Is she going to handle men’s underwear and women’s bikinis for sale and display?


47 posted on 06/02/2015 2:32:22 PM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Biggirl

I don’t know why anyone would want to work there.

But if you accept the no Muslims rule, then you will have to go along with employees not wearing crosses on their necklaces. Or yarmulkes for the little jewish boys. Or Calladeigh rings for the little Irish Catholic kids.

Please respond to those items being excluded. I would be interested to hear your legal justification of that.

Should we be allowed to reject terrorists? Sure. Show where they are terrorists, and I am sure the courts will follow.


50 posted on 06/02/2015 2:43:40 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Biggirl

She doesn’t. It was probably a set up.


51 posted on 06/02/2015 3:04:50 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Biggirl

To answer the question, its the same reason why gays target Christian businesses... To push their agenda


55 posted on 06/02/2015 6:10:41 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (Making harmless people defenseless, does not make dangerous people harmless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson