Skip to comments.
BREAKING NEWS: Appeals court refuses to lift hold on Obama immigration action
FOX News ^
| May 26, 2015
Posted on 05/26/2015 12:32:49 PM PDT by Din Maker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Good News!!!
1
posted on
05/26/2015 12:32:50 PM PDT
by
Din Maker
To: Din Maker
Judges: Prepare for an IRS audit!
2
posted on
05/26/2015 12:33:36 PM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(They need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' which has nothing to do with virtue.)
To: Din Maker
3
posted on
05/26/2015 12:36:06 PM PDT
by
Guenevere
(If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do........Psalms 11:3)
To: Din Maker
Better chance in NO than with the supes.
4
posted on
05/26/2015 12:37:08 PM PDT
by
Yaelle
("You're gonna fly away, Glad you're going my way... I love it when we're Cruzin together")
To: Din Maker
Judicial watch needs to demand the identification and addresses of all those illegals Obama has let in to the country illegally (they had to sign up right?) so their deportation can be fast-tracked.
To: Din Maker
Like it will matter. Obama and the massive progressive-left US government bureaucracy will ultimately do what it wants.
6
posted on
05/26/2015 12:41:50 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Din Maker
What good will this do? Not a thing. The invasion continues on a daily basis.
7
posted on
05/26/2015 12:42:38 PM PDT
by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
To: PGR88
8
posted on
05/26/2015 12:44:06 PM PDT
by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
To: Din Maker
Please appeal to the Supreme Court. I don’t think even as messed up as they are they could do less than strike this down hard.
9
posted on
05/26/2015 12:47:57 PM PDT
by
DaxtonBrown
(http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
To: Din Maker
Really curious as to the reasoning of the dissent. I wonder if it was an argument against the merits, or simply that no ‘lasting harm’ could come with lifting the stay.
10
posted on
05/26/2015 12:48:22 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: Din Maker
11
posted on
05/26/2015 12:48:24 PM PDT
by
onyx
(PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! God bless you all.)
To: Din Maker
does Obama really pay attention to these? Honestly it is good news
12
posted on
05/26/2015 12:48:41 PM PDT
by
dp0622
To: Din Maker
FOX NEWS should be on fire tonight!!!
13
posted on
05/26/2015 12:48:54 PM PDT
by
EagleUSA
(Liberalism removes the significance of everything.)
To: DaxtonBrown
Its just the injunction so I doubt it will get appealed to SC. Barry will either ignore or find some other avenue to screw with the country....gee what could that be? Ah, tada, the trade bill.
14
posted on
05/26/2015 12:50:05 PM PDT
by
Mouton
(The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
To: Din Maker
It wasn't immediately clear if the government would appeal, either to the full appeals court in New Orleans or to the U.S. Supreme Court
Yes the dingbats are trying to figure out what's the fastest way to a corrupt judge.
Appealing En banc to the 5th circuit would likely have same results, and Scalia would deny it too before they could appeal it to another SCOTUS libjudge...a Moonbat.
Keep the clock running on Obama. ;-)
To: kingu
Really curious as to the reasoning of the dissent. I wonder if it was an argument against the merits, or simply that no lasting harm could come with lifting the stay. After reading the dissent, I am left with a WTF look. I saw nothing in his dissent that made any sense. Claimed the suit was political not an legal issue. DOH, letting Millions violate the law and then be given tax payer bennies for doing so is NOT an legal issue. Me thinks someone didn't want to make Obie mad.
16
posted on
05/26/2015 12:54:01 PM PDT
by
VRWCarea51
(The original 1998 version)
To: EagleUSA
Shepard Smith is going to soil his depends...
17
posted on
05/26/2015 12:55:30 PM PDT
by
VRWCarea51
(The original 1998 version)
To: PGR88
Obama and the massive progressive-left US government bureaucracy will ultimately do what it wants. The courts are just documenting that the administration is acting outside of the law. We will see how this plays out.
18
posted on
05/26/2015 12:55:57 PM PDT
by
oldbrowser
(We have a rogue government in Washington.)
To: VRWCarea51
Do you have a link to the dissent? And gosh, 3/4 of what the appeals courts deal with are political in nature. Never seems to stop them from making bad rulings on the cases. Was there a single homosexual shacking up case that wasn’t a political question and not one of the law?
19
posted on
05/26/2015 1:01:14 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: kingu
Really curious as to the reasoning of the dissent. Stephen Higginson is an Obama appointee with aspirations of a Supreme Court appointment. No further reasoning is required.
20
posted on
05/26/2015 1:04:50 PM PDT
by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson