Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

500 groups urge repeal of ObamaCare cost-cutting panel
The Hill ^ | May 5, 2015 | By Peter Sullivan

Posted on 05/05/2015 7:11:15 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Over 500 organizations are calling on Congress to repeal a Medicare cost-cutting board that is part of ObamaCare.

The panel at issue is called the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), and is charged with coming up with ways to cut Medicare spending.

Legislation to repeal the board sponsored by Reps. Phil Roe (R-Tenn.) and Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.) has 222 co-sponsors, including 19 Democrats.

While some opponents of ObamaCare have called the IPAB a “death panel,” the board is banned by law from recommending changes that would ration care or require seniors to pay a higher share of costs. Its reforms are intended to focus on efficiency in Medicare’s payment system.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Tennessee; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; abortion; california; deathpanel; deathpanels; election2016; ipab; lindasanchez; medicare; obamacare; philroe; rinocare; socialism; tedcruz; tennessee; texas; zerocare

1 posted on 05/05/2015 7:11:15 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB)” = DEATH PANELS!


2 posted on 05/05/2015 7:14:32 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“While some opponents of ObamaCare have called the IPAB a “death panel,” the board is banned by law from recommending changes that would ration care or require seniors to pay a higher share of costs”

How about repealing obamacare in its entirety?


3 posted on 05/05/2015 7:15:07 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It doesn’t need to be repealed.

It’s the most unconstitutional structure ever devised, or even imagined.

Congress can’t eliminate it by legislation? Don’t be ridiculous.


4 posted on 05/05/2015 7:16:07 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Congress can’t eliminate it by legislation?

Welcome to the progressive's administrative state.

5 posted on 05/05/2015 7:37:05 AM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, trust few, and always paddle your own canoe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
While some opponents of ObamaCare have called the IPAB a “death panel,” the board is banned by law from recommending changes that would ration care or require seniors to pay a higher share of costs.

Oh, please. The rebuttal presented is fallacious and re-directs the opponents' claim. The IPAB will work by adjusting the treatment protocols to limit treatment options under certain conditions. This is a one-size-fits-all solution that should better be left with the patient and their doctor. Now, the doctor will be forced into less-expensive options beyond certain ages.

However it is described, this panel will effectively become a "death panel."

6 posted on 05/05/2015 8:13:39 AM PDT by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

How about repealing obamacare in its entirety?

How about repealing EVERYTHING ibama has done these last 6+ years!


7 posted on 05/05/2015 8:22:04 AM PDT by Leep (To put it in laymen's terms liberal/progressive ist coo coo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

“While some opponents of ObamaCare have called the IPAB a “death panel,” the board is banned by law from recommending changes that would ration care or require seniors to pay a higher share of costs. Its reforms are intended to focus on efficiency in Medicare’s payment system.”

If the board is banned by law, why is there a board in the first place?


8 posted on 05/05/2015 8:56:01 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (two if by van, one if by broom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
<>It’s the most unconstitutional structure ever devised, or even imagined.<>

Yes, despite Scotus’ efforts to rewrote the statute to make it supposedly constitutional.

Just keep voting.

9 posted on 05/05/2015 12:45:27 PM PDT by Jacquerie (To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Leep

A voice for reason. Please run for office and help the working class out.


10 posted on 05/05/2015 12:55:19 PM PDT by mcshot (I pray someone comes forth with the strength, fortitude and burning desire to save our Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

I would run as the “do less” candidate.

“What are you going to do?”

I am going to do less!

> A lot LESS illegals!

>A lot LESS Entitlement programs!

>A lot LESS IRS!

>A lot LESS big government!


11 posted on 05/05/2015 1:34:00 PM PDT by Leep (To put it in laymen's terms liberal/progressive ist coo coo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson