Posted on 05/02/2015 3:03:09 PM PDT by lbryce
It’s been a tough week for Hillary Clinton, with a flurry of bad news that is casting further doubt on her prospects for winning the Democratic Party nomination, let alone the White House.
She did receive a celebrity endorsement, but, alas, it came from pornographer Larry Flynt, and as Bloomberg’s John Heilemann observes, it “beggars belief that she and her team will be issuing any press releases touting the latest bold-faced name to clamber aboard her bandwagon.”
A new Associated Press-GfK poll finds Americans suspicious of Clinton’s honesty, and even many Democrats are only lukewarm about her presidential candidacy.
Her inability to explain the use of a private email server while secretary of state and allegations the Clintons have used their Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation for personal gain have affected public perceptions, the AP said. In the survey, 61 percent said “honest” describes her only slightly well or not at all.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Do I know that guy?
My doctor said how you look on the outside counts and I have to wonder if she’d even make it through one term without something big happening to her.
Personally, if I had all that money and a grandchild, and been through all the controversies, pressure, publicity, there is NO WAY I would be wanting to be POTUS. With her criminal history and her un-likability factor she is really pushing her luck. My husband said of some rich people we knew who got into trouble from their pursuit of more more more “It was just never enough”
I think she is a madwoman - literally.
Which begs the question: Is she a guaranteed winner or loser if she's the Dem nominee? Which do Repubs/conservatives want?
The answer is: She beats the Republican who most closely resembles her. If it's Jeb, Christie, Paul or Huckster she beats them like a drum. She looses to Walker, Cruz or possibly Rubio.
If the nominee is someone else then we'll just have to see.
I love that they always put Chelsea’s name in the mix.
Hillary can’t “non-accept” the endorsement. If she did, Larry Flynt might release those pictures of Huma and Hillary and tell how many magazines Hustler has shipped to her house in plain brown paper.
If she accepts his endorsement she’s a part of the war on women.
Someone wants her out of this race. I think the powers want Biden. He can be made to do anything.
People look at this person and are thrilled and pre-committed.
The fact that you and I did not see B. Clinton “charisma” just means that the American public will see it in HRC: most are already precommitted to her.
Iron Munro has stated exactly the mindset of the typical U.S. “Democrat” voters. They are not “democratic” but totalitarian.
The only ones who find her “unlikeable” are those who hasve always opposed her since she flared on the national stage in 1991 after being a but player in Watergate.
Hasve= have
but = bit
So in case you can’t tell, I am a female and there was just something about him that creeped me out....didn’t like his hands...his whole body. There were times his face looked sort of cute but still...I couldn’t figure out why so many women went bonkers over him. And he had that definite snake oil salesman vibe...sleezy con man. YUK!
Where Hillary is concerned I think it’s either people who are figuring there’s something in it for them or they buy into the “it’s time for a woman pure CRAP”. That’s pathetic and sexist.
You are so on target with your perspective, but the American people can’t see it. They think HRC is “Wonder Woman” like the old Mighty Mouse character “out to save the day”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.