The Senate needs to confirm this baby killer so that the Rev. Al can end his hunger strike!
The Senate needs to confirm this baby killer so that the Rev. Al can end his hunger strike!
Yeah, not like the phrase "I deserve to be confirmed as Attorney General and anyone who thinks otherwise is a racist."
Which word confuses her? Living or fetus?
From the top down...everyone hired by this administration is an exact copy of Obama. Go Cruz!!
Maybe Ms Lynch should watch up close a partial birth abortion so she can hear and see the life go out of the baby. That should clear it up the vague. Lynch; what an appropriate name for that POS.
Why not print this questionaire up encircle your answers and send it to your US Senator
Dear Senator
INS...Amnesty.. Forget about Ebola
We don’t allow cattle to enter without a background health and ancestry check which we also reqiure of legal immigrants who wait years and still go thru health and record checks. We also require that any legal immingrant demonstrate prior to entry that they offer a contribution to our society and not dependency upon it .
The point being there is legislation enacted by congress that is supposed to be followed regulating immigration that any Presidential appointee is to follow who has been sworn to uphold and defend the constitution.
Yet we’re letting children and gang bangers in without doing any of this which has resulted in dispersing virulent new diseases (measles) and drug use which has resulted in unreported cases in schools where these illegal kids were placed.. Plus shoved a severe financial strain on local governments where they are placed .
Should any candidate for Attorney General supporting these practices be denied confirmation ?(Yes) (No) . Should the senate abandon the 60 vote majority for the “nuclear option” used by Reid when majority leader of the senate to any such candidate to be Attorney General supporting the above by applying the simple majority Reid rule. But citing the Hanen court injunction ruling that would restrict the use of the Reid rule only when such a ruling by a Judge were made ? (Yes) (No)
Should those given this bypassed favored treatment who miss their INS hearing be deported fortwith ? (Y) (N).. ? Denied re-entry (Y)(N) ? Snould that also apply to any illegal convicted of a felony (Y)(N)
In “countries where an American citizen decides to be a “legal” emigree never mind being a seasonal visitor still are denied voting privledges. Own land in their own name. Face steep fines before getting kicked out let alone denied income and energy subsistance including food stamps, or bring in family members .
I (do) (don’t) believe we should allow such full citizenship privledges mentioned above which are denied by the country of national origin of the above, to a legal American immigrant , deny such full citizen privledges to any (emigree) (seasonal vistor) (illegal) if their country does not allow those same privledges to any citizen of the United States, .
While such a position will be condemed as defacto deportation particularly by the political establishment .Would you continue to support a Senator who refuses to support such restrictions ? (Y) (N) Does that also include erecting border barriers such as fencing designed to discourage surrepticious or uncontolled entry ? (Yes) (No)
Should any American citizen which goes overseas to join a foreign entity fighting against the United States (such as ISIS) Be denied re-entry (Y)(N) and their citizenship revoked? (Y) (N) Should that person be charged with treason (Y)(N)
Very Truly Yours For Restoring the value of American citizenship and Conservative Government
If you want to really confuse her, say the word “Constitution”.
Good heavens! I wasn’t aware she isn’t fluent in English ...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Sheesh this administration is jam packed of blacks, and Muslims....and various shades of suntans.
That is something that has come straight out of Satan’s mouth.
Substitute “Pubert Addams”?
When Obummer won, it follows that Holder/Lynch will follow.
Blame all those who abstained from voting in 2012. I can only hope the lesson is learned. President Hillary will get to nominate many SCOTUS replacements. Very scary proposition for 30+ years.
I may be mistaken, but I believe the Rove v Wade Ruling was specific to allowing Abortion only when the Fetus was not considered “Viable”.
If that’s the case, how did we end up with Abortion on Demand no matter the Gestation period?