Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Walker stands for American workers on immigration
Hot Air: Headlines ^ | April 21, 2015 | Matthew Boyle

Posted on 04/21/2015 5:50:12 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

"....This development, perhaps one of if not the biggest of the 2016 presidential campaign so far, comes as Walker has taken a commanding lead in polls in all three of the first GOP primary states: Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina.

The reason why this development is so significant is that the two establishment-backed candidates, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, both have an in-depth understanding of the immigration issue and come down on the side that supports special interests’ desire for a massive increase in legal immigration that hurts American workers.

Meanwhile, Sens. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Rand Paul (R-KY)—who like Walker make up the more grassroots conservative side of the field—don’t really weigh in on the legal side of the immigration issue. So as Walker continues to gain traction as a potential candidate, and readies himself for a launch, it’s quite clear he’s making a significant effort to learn what he now clearly understands is one of the most under-appreciated angles of the jagged razor-edge issue of immigration—the angle that polling shows can help him clear the GOP field and easily eliminate Rubio and Bush, whose pro-open borders positions stand against American workers....... Scott Walker Lays Out Pro American Worker Stance on Immigration

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: New Hampshire; US: South Carolina; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2016election; aliens; amnesty; economy; election2016; illegals; iowa; jobs; newhampshire; randnesty; scottwalker; southcarolina; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: dangus

Incredible article. But I thought all the liberal hipster millionaires were for equal opportunity and diversity. THIS is how they get to look great and save money. “look at the diversity, Chinese, Indian, Pakistani” except they are not Americans. I hate them


21 posted on 04/21/2015 7:54:33 AM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
If we could drag the corruption of McConnell, vis a vis the oligarchy (Silicon Valley, Banks, Buffett), the way Hillary's corruption is now being discussed, maybe we'd have a chance to kill amnesty.

Look at Paul Ryan! He *disgusts* me now. Doesn't he LIVE in Cupertino, these days? What if we knew exactly how much he was being paid to please Zuckerberg? He's turned into the worst weasel of a betrayer, and he's not even a lawyer!

22 posted on 04/21/2015 8:39:33 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dangus

No sensible person is going to be anti-trade. I have no problem with a Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement SO LONG AS WE ARE REPRESENTED ADEQUATELY AT THE NEGOTIATION TABLE. I have zero interest in just becoming another casulty oF legacy building, but done right a good trade agreement could be a huge positive.


23 posted on 04/21/2015 9:19:39 AM PDT by BlackAdderess ("Give me a but a firm spot on which to stand, and I shall move the earth". --Archimedes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BlackAdderess

Right. And do you think Obama is going to represent us adequately at the negotiation table?


24 posted on 04/21/2015 9:22:56 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

As I said in a post on another thread, I believe Walker’s political savvy has led him to the sweet spot in the immigration debate. He’s now decided to emphasize the impact of both legal and illegal immigration on American wages, which is obviously negative.

This is the perfect stance to take against the populist rhetoric on the left, which wants to address “income inequality” by the usual method of taking from the rich and distributing it (via government of course) to everyone else.

Instead, hard work and innovation, if encouraged, will lead to increased GDP and if wages are not suppressed by excessive immigration (legal or otherwise), then everyone will benefit. Income inequality will be addressed by market actions, rather than government intervention.

This is an argument that will appeal to both Independents and to Democrats frustrated with Obama’s open border policy and the recent lurch of the Democrat Party toward the far left.

The same argument should also allay some of the concerns that Walker could turn into another crony capitalist if elected, for it’s big business that benefits most from both legal and illegal immigration.


25 posted on 04/21/2015 9:27:09 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Not at all, which is why I am vehemently opposed to Trade Promotion Authority, otherwise known as fasr track.


26 posted on 04/21/2015 9:29:57 AM PDT by BlackAdderess ("Give me a but a firm spot on which to stand, and I shall move the earth". --Archimedes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Norseman
Instead, hard work and innovation, if encouraged, will lead to increased GDP and if wages are not suppressed by excessive immigration (legal or otherwise), then everyone will benefit. Income inequality will be addressed by market actions, rather than government intervention.

That sounds very Walkerish.

28 posted on 04/21/2015 9:31:31 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BlackAdderess

OK, so we agree. I thought you were countering me.


29 posted on 04/21/2015 10:01:51 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sf4dubya

Stop spamming all the threads. Thank you.


30 posted on 04/21/2015 11:04:31 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Gumdrop

Walker had an opinion on amnesty as far back as his county executive days in 2002 when he signed a resolution in support of amnesty and comprehensive immigration reform

And he certainly sounded well informed on the issue when he wrote a letter back in 2010 in support of Arizona’s immigration bill.

Then in 2012 he said that he no longer supported an Arizona type bill and that would be a huge distraction to his agenda in WI.

He spoke about illegal immigration again in an interview in 2013. So he has been well aware of the issue. He has played this hokey pokey game with other issues as well like common core, right to work, ethanol, abortion and gay marriage.

In 2013 the dairy industry in WI stated that they would push hard for immigration reform and that pushing for legislation was a top priority. The industry relies heavily on immigrant workers.

At that time around 40% of farm workers were immigrants. 90% were immigrants from Mexico and about 50% of them were here illegally. Now WI is the second highest producer of milk in the country. Yes, illegal immigration and immigration issues have been an issue here. Maybe not the same type of problems on the border but it has been in the news. There has been a lot of political pressure for reform to benefit the dairy industry and other industries that want to employ immigrants year round.

To think that Walker just had a “come to Jesus” moment about immigration issues is disingenuous. What he is doing is adjusting his statements to appeal to different groups because he is running for president. The problem is that he has done it so much that he has damaged his credibility with conservative voters.


31 posted on 04/21/2015 11:12:47 AM PDT by conservativegranny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

as expected walker aligns himself with sessions on immigration, legal and illegal. excellent news. thanks for the post.


32 posted on 04/21/2015 11:25:48 AM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
If the choice is Walker*, I'll pass on voting for president and instead focus on the balance of the ballot. I'd rather see Republicans lose than to vote for someone that I wholeheartedly disagree with. And it is not just amnesty as we now see Walker finding homosexual marriage being okay. What next?

Or Bush III or Rubio or Christie, etc.

33 posted on 04/21/2015 11:31:43 AM PDT by Reno89519 (For every illegal or H1B with a job, there's an American without one. Muslim = Nazi = Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson