Posted on 04/19/2015 7:39:38 AM PDT by expat_panama
[from IBD: Should ETFs Be In Your Investment Portfolio?] While ETFs have existed for several decades, their popularity and diversity have exploded in recent years. But many investors are just learning about them. [snip]
|
|||
--and: Exchange-Traded Funds (ETF) Center - Yahoo Finance Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) - Investopedia Best ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) | US News Best Funds --and from our leaders always there to help us: What is an ETF?......Like mutual funds, ETFs offer investors a way to pool their money in a fund that makes investments in stocks, bonds, or other assets and, in return, to receive an interest in that investment pool. Unlike mutual funds, however, ETF shares are traded on a national stock exchange and at market prices that may or may not be the same as the net asset value (NAV) of the shares, that is, the value of the ETFs assets minus its liabilities divided by the number of shares outstanding. Things to Consider before Investing in ETFsETFs are not mutual funds. Generally, ETFs combine features of a mutual fund, which can be purchased or redeemed at the end of each trading day at its NAV per share, with the intraday trading feature of a closed-end fund, whose shares trade throughout the trading day at market prices... [snip] |
That was the pros, here's the con's side: Should Mutual Funds Be Made Illegal? - Matt Levine, Bloomberg Why Hillary Clinton is going after hedge funds ETFs May Be Moving Stocks in Unseen Ways The Hidden Risks and Costs of ETFs - US News Exchange-traded funds: Too much of a good thing ... * * * * * * * * * *
|
Preferably, filled with coffee...
That is impressive. Hope you’re enjoying your time away.
ticker | handle | current | % over |
CMPR | 86.88 | 87.15 | 0.3% |
HAR | 145.1 | 146.31 | 0.8% |
AMCX | 74.74 | 75.41 | 0.9% |
EA | 58.97 | 59.68 | 1.2% |
AYI | 164.23 | 166.31 | 1.3% |
DIS | 106.08 | 108.155 | 1.9% |
KMX | 68.81 | 70.89 | 2.9% |
ZTS | 45.34 | 46.85 | 3.2% |
AFSI | 57.09 | 59.31 | 3.7% |
CYBR | 63.08 | 65.95 | 4.4% |
OZRK | 38.06 | 39.80 | 4.4% |
ZBRA | 92.58 | 97.27 | 4.8% |
IBD says to buy when it's within 5% over the handle buypoint, but I'm waiting also for a solid market uptrend.
Told you all CAT was a screaming buy anywhere below 80.
LOL, “ a gret big ole TOLDJASO “
Good morning, happy Friday to ya, and the UPTREND RESUMES! Seems our chronically sideways stock market has finally seeped up into a new high forcing us to admit that we've been clearly in an uptrend. For decades this has historically it signaled a buying opportunity, though for all of this past year they've been false and contrary market timing's ruled. Humph.
Just the same, these sideways/false-sigs are still uptrending (futures +0.17%), not like metals that have been sideways/downtrending: gold'n'silver now @ $1,193.4 and $15.92 w/ futures negative. Durable goods orders posted in a half hour.
News:
Nasdaq hits a new all-time high San Jose Mercury News - 5:02am With the Nasdaq on Thursday breaking its former record high close set in the dot-com days of 2000, here's one thing to remember: That was then, and this is now.China, Japan stocks fall on data, Nasdaq boosts some markets TriCities.com - 3 hours ago Market data is displayed on the screens at the Nasdaq MarketSite in New York, Thursday, April 23, 2015. The Nasdaq composite has closed at a record high for the first time since the dot-com bubble of 2000.Doomsayers Were Wrong About BP Spill - Steve Moore & Joel Griffith, NRPatience running short in Greek bailout negotiations MarketWatch - 4 hours ago RIGA, Latvia - Eurozone finance ministers urged Greece to move faster in presenting its overhaul plans Friday, as some of them expressed annoyance with the lack of progress in bailout negotiations.
Have We Seen the End of 8-Hour Work Day? - Nathan Schneider, Nation
Saudi Arabia Intends to Pump Even More Crude - Grant Smith, Bloomberg
-——Involuntary part-time is becoming the new norm for low-wage workers-——
The concept of part time is archaic. There is no part time any more, there is only time. Further, time for many can not exceed thirty hours per week. The union goal of a thirty hour week has been accomplished.
The problem is that people can’t live on the proceeds from merely working thirty hours.
Through out this whole history of labor leaders calling for a shorter workday, somehow the union bosses always assumed that the paycheck would stay big while work hours got small. They never saw a problem w/ that and were always dismissive of concerns over production and business' labor costs.
Ignore reality and it bites.
I don't think they really gave a rat's ass about the paychecks. They were assuming the union dues would stay the same, and the companies would have to hire more workers, so there'd be more of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.