Posted on 04/10/2015 1:26:44 PM PDT by Biggirl
MSNBC host Ed Schultz declared “we really don’t know where Hillary Clinton stands” on a whole host of issues and that her being silent is “kind of par for the course” on Thursday.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Please. She is an orthodox leftist, her opinions move leftward with the rest of them.
Didn't Brokaw and Charlie Rose talk about 0-Bummer in 2008 saying they didn't know where he stood on issues??
OH that's right..it was on PBS that's why it wasn't covered!!
If the likes of Ed Schulz are not excited about Hillary, what does that tell you? That the liberals will not line up behind Hillary?? That they are dying for Elizabeth Warren or some other liberal/radical types to run against Hillary?? What the heck???
Mr. Ed Schultz obviously was SLEEPING through the time when Hillary was in the Senate and the State Department.
Just look at her Senate VOTING RECORD and what she did as Secretary of State.
Bingo.
And her particular flavor of Leftism is Pinko-Kleptocracy.
I bet we’re just supposed to elect her so we can find out. (Ala Nancy Pelosi)
Not knowing where Obama stood on most of the issues in 2008 didn’t stop the media from fawning all over him.
I doubt it will slow them from fawning all over Hillary — unless a more viable candidate steps up.
One thing you can guarantee. It won’t be on your side of the aisle if you’re a patriotic Conservative Christian.
What difference does it make?
Don’t ask her ,she’ll never going to tell ,LOL
Maybe, if the phony were to pull his head out of his big, fat posterior, he could get a clue about Hitlery!
Hillary is running on her vagina and not even Bill wants to go there.
She is a rabid orthodox leftist, otherwise she is for sale.
My unexpert analysis, which is worth what everyone here is paying for it: Hillary! dreams of being America’s Vlada Putin, but President Hillary! would be America’s Cristina Kirchner. (Or Imelda Marcos. Or Indira Gandhi. Or Grace Mugabe.)
Bingo!
What difference at this point yadda yadda yadda.
Rinse repeat.
OMG. I’ve heard some say that Hillary hopes to get “the vaginal vote”.
I don’t really know many liberals. But know many more moderate or conservative women. None of them like Hillary. A few of them absolutely can’t stand her. I would be shocked if any of them would vote for Hillary just to make a statement about wanting a woman president.
I would love to see a woman president someday. Just not Hillary or some other Alinskyite liberal female.
There is a reason for this and it’s a big problem for Hillary. The country is sick and tired of Obamaism and the only shot the Dems have in 2016 is to run a Billy Jeff style “triangulator.” But if she deviates at all from what their moonbat base wants, she will draw a primary challenger.
Can you imagine the amount of damage can be caused by 8-10 candidate attacking Hillary! non-stop for the next 12-18 months?
Clintons are dedicated public servants who stand firmly on the side that pays the most.
/s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.