Posted on 04/04/2015 6:45:17 PM PDT by EveningStar
“For a medical practitioner or business owner to file a lawsuit based on what might happen in 2019 is preposterous. This is precisely why the U.S. Supreme Court didn’t even agree to hear this case. “
And that’s why it isn’t any sort of earthshaking decision. Since there was no harm in evidence (yet), The plaintiffs had no standing. W/O Standing, there could be no case.l Dems be the rules.
I hold the so called supreme court in contempt. What a joke they have become. They have been bought off or blackmailed into servile submission.
Even if what you say/think is true, that doesn’t make them irrelevant. In reality they’re very damned relevant.
bookmark
[[For a medical practitioner or business owner to file a lawsuit based on what might happen in 2019 is preposterous.]]
Hell, we’re facign trillions in fines taxes and carbon footprint charges over climate change based on ‘what might happen 200 years from now’
I think he meant they have become a group of folks who will not uphold the rule of law any longer- I think he just used the wrong word
*
Nah...there is only one.
A pen and a phone.
I followed them in my brief day trader sous bandit career
They were libtards I think
Have you faced a single fine or tax based on a “carbon footprint?”
yes, higher food prices thanks to carbon based regulations- next question?
Well, the court was right to dismiss for lack of standing.
But IPAB is SO blatantly, floridly, OBVIOUSLY unconstitutional that I can only believe the authors of Obamacare believed that by 2017 their creation would have collapsed and been replaced by full-on nationalization.
I also thought that was the plan
higher food prices, higher clothing prices, higher fuel prices because of regulations on trucking based on ‘carbon footprint’ higher electricity prices, on and on it goes- they have been sneaking in ‘carbon footprint’ taxes via carbon regulations for awhile now, and we are seeing prices skyrocket lately- for EVERYTHING practically- thanks to government regulations and demands for epa compliance etc-
You think they thought a republican presidency would have nationalized healthcare to keep his ‘legacy’ alive?
I suppose the argument could be made that the left truly believed the right would be too scared to touch ocare after so many people were getting it ‘free’ and would have to ‘fix’ it in 2017- but not do away with it out of fear-
No, the next Republican administration will nationalize healthcare because events have left them with no other choice which would be acceptable to them or to their paymasters.
Do you have any proof that Roberts made this decision unilaterally? He is but one of nine justices.
So Roberts is just like those other four justices and always votes with them?
“Have you faced a single fine or tax based on a “carbon footprint?””
My husband’s power plant is going bankrupt because they cannot pay their carbon emissions fee. They laid off 25% of the workforce, but still can’t pay it. They will just limp along until it is overdue and then declare bankruptcy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.