Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

No, the gays didn’t do it, Obama did it, let’s reverse rather than let the polygamists join them as you want.

“I don’t want the U.S. military having any role in defining marriage.”

There you go, silliness, you know very well that our men in war are going to want to have their widows taken care of, and in many cases to live on base with them and be schooled and treated and protected by the government during their years of service.

It has been so in law written by the Continental Congress of 1780, and of 1794, and of 1798, and on.

Now you want Muslims to bring their multiple wives.


116 posted on 04/03/2015 5:02:28 PM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12
Your arguments about the Federal role in defining marriage are no more relevant than what I've posted about cultures with no written languages.

The statutes from the 18th century related to military spouses are academic, as far as I'm concerned ... because personally, I can't imagine why any self-respecting man with a Christian world view would ever put his life and safety (and a potential widow's well-being) in the hands of the government in a nation as nihilistic, depraved, and openly hostile to Christianity as ours is.

120 posted on 04/03/2015 5:09:38 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson