Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
Your arguments about the Federal role in defining marriage are no more relevant than what I've posted about cultures with no written languages.

The statutes from the 18th century related to military spouses are academic, as far as I'm concerned ... because personally, I can't imagine why any self-respecting man with a Christian world view would ever put his life and safety (and a potential widow's well-being) in the hands of the government in a nation as nihilistic, depraved, and openly hostile to Christianity as ours is.

120 posted on 04/03/2015 5:09:38 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Those statutes have always and continuously been maintained and updated, and are still there, because they are necessary, and completely current and relevant.

But thanks for the bile about America and our fighting men, who actually tend to have that “Christian world view” that you imply they don’t have, they also have self respect.

You would deprive them of what they need to maintain and protect their families, by either taking it all away from them, or making it so overburdened with polygamy and personal relationships that it couldn’t work.


122 posted on 04/03/2015 5:17:24 PM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson