Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disabled Navy Vet Left ‘Devastated’ After All of His Guns Are Confiscated (Neighbor falsely accuses)
The Blaze ^ | April 1 2015 | Jason Howerton

Posted on 04/01/2015 11:39:58 AM PDT by Whenifhow

A disabled U.S. Navy veteran in Glendale, Arizona, is “devastated” after he says police confiscated 28 of his guns, valued at over $25,000, after a neighbor made “false” allegations that he threatened him.

Rick Bailey, a 56-year-old retired software systems engineer, told TheBlaze on Tuesday that he and his neighbor were engaged in a months-long dispute over his landscaping company. He said his neighbor would park two large, smelly “dump trucks” used for his business and other vehicles in the small cul-de-sac where they live.

Bailey said he eventually filed a complaint with the city and the neighbor was ordered to remove all dump trucks and other work-related equipment from the private residence. Though he initially complied with the city’s order, the veteran said his neighbor would sometimes bring the trucks back on some weekends, when the city was closed, “just to irritate us.”

After over two months of calm in January and February, the situation climaxed on March 16 after Bailey called police because he smelled what he thought were “toxic chemicals” coming from the neighbor’s property.

“I spend my days sitting out on my patio relaxing,” he told TheBlaze, explaining that he is severely disabled. “The smell got so bad, I had to come back to my patio and use my inhaler — so I called the police to see if anything could be done.”

When the police arrived, Bailey said he was told by police officers that the neighbor alleged he had threatened to “shoot” him, a claim he said was “bulls**t.” The very next day, March 17, the neighbor told authorities that Bailey had threatened him and filed for an “injunction against harassment.”

Bailey said he’s been trained on firearms since he was a kid and fully understands the implications of threatening to “shoot” someone, even as a joke.

But the protective order doesn’t even appear to mention Bailey making any gun-related threats. The neighbor alleged that Bailey threatened to “stuff me in my dump truck,” demanded that he move his trucks, and told him to move his boat to the other side of his property, according to a copy of the neighbor’s injection petition.

Read all of the complains the neighbor listed as reasons why he needed a protective order here:

Image

Bailey denies threatening his neighbor. He also said he is physically incapable of harming the man due to his disability. Bailey said he was medically discharged from the Navy after four years of service due to a serious back injury. His condition eventually forced to retire from his job as well.

Still, a judge apparently found the neighbor’s allegations sufficient enough to not only issue the protective order, but to also order the confiscation of his 28 firearms. The judge attached a separate order directing officers to take Bailey’s guns and revoking his right to purchase firearms, according to documents obtained by TheBlaze.

Under “other orders,” the judge wrote: “Def shall not have/buy firearms, surrender any to Glendale PD.”

Bailey told TheBlaze the Glendale Police Department wasted no time, arriving at his house to confiscate his guns the same day the judge signed the order.

Glendale Police Department spokesman Sgt. David Vidaure confirmed to TheBlaze that police received the court order and acted on it by confiscating Bailey’s firearms. He said the police department did not play a role in the decision.

“I was totally devastated,” Bailey told TheBlaze. “I couldn’t believe something like this could happen. I had a 3-hour anxiety-slash-panic attack while officers were there and after they left. They wanted to call an ambulance.”

The Navy veteran intends to appeal the judge’s court orders and attempt to reclaim the confiscated firearm stash that took him over a decade to collect. A GoFundMe page has since been started to raise money for legal fees in the case.

Vidaure said the protective order is valid for one year, and — in theory — Bailey should get his guns back when it expires.

Bailey said he hopes his case can serve as a precedent to prevent other gun owners from having their weapons confiscated over wrongful allegations.

“I want people to be able to look it up and say, ‘This is so unjust, it should not be done, period.’ And anybody who makes false claims like this, once it’s proven, should face a federal punishment. They should be put in jail.”

Calls made to the Glendale City Court were not immediately returned.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; confiscation; navy; veteran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 04/01/2015 11:39:58 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; All

The entire article is posted except for images of neighbor’s complaints on the page.


2 posted on 04/01/2015 11:41:52 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

How would they know how many guns he has?


3 posted on 04/01/2015 11:43:49 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

What a low rat of a neighbor he has. Would be nice for word to spread around so that less people would want this man doing their landscaping. Two can play at this game!


4 posted on 04/01/2015 11:44:35 AM PDT by lee martell (The sa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Yet another reason for off-paper, and not stroing all of them on-site.


5 posted on 04/01/2015 11:44:37 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

USN vs. Dreamer type?


6 posted on 04/01/2015 11:45:17 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

It pays to be nice with your neighbors...that said, bearing false witness is something this accuser will pay for (in this life or the next) if in fact what he’s saying is false.


7 posted on 04/01/2015 11:47:08 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Wonder if he can sue the city and neighbor?


8 posted on 04/01/2015 11:48:09 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

How would they know how many guns he has?
_________
From the article it is not clear that the neighbor knew how many guns Bailey had. The image on the page may have info, but couldn’t get it zoomed enough to read it.


9 posted on 04/01/2015 11:50:49 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

When they come take mine... sorry, they ‘disappeared’ in a boating accident.

Never tell a representative of the state (police included) how many firearms you have. EVER.

Foremostly it ain’t none of there dang business.

“Nope... they gone... lost them all”


10 posted on 04/01/2015 11:52:26 AM PDT by envisio (I ain't here long... I'm out of napalm and .22 bullets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Not the neighbor, the police.


11 posted on 04/01/2015 11:52:39 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Another reason to set up a Gun Trust, and list ALOT of people as co-ttees. You don't actually own or possess firearms. The trust does.

.....oh, and by the way...you better have a warrant GPD.

12 posted on 04/01/2015 11:54:48 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Such BS.

When I got divorced, my ex immediately placed a restraining order on me. It was her idea for the divorce, I did nothing to cause her to need one, it was just her method of operation. She did the same with the next 4 people she was with as soon as each relationship failed.

I understand that restraining orders do serve a purpose for people who are legitimately harassed or threatened, but they also can be used to harass.


13 posted on 04/01/2015 11:55:49 AM PDT by arbitrary.squid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Neighbor would meet my baseball bat and then I’d ask, “Wouldn’t you have rather been shot?”.


14 posted on 04/01/2015 12:03:00 PM PDT by G Larry (Obama Hates America, Israel, Capitalism, Freedom, and Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
This is how the story will start across the nation, but this is not how the story will end.

BLOAT.

5.56mm

15 posted on 04/01/2015 12:03:51 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
“I want people to be able to look it up and say, ‘This is so unjust, it should not be done, period.’ And anybody who makes false claims like this, once it’s proven, should face a federal punishment. They should be put in jail.”

Couldn't agree more...the accuser should also pay restitution to the town.

16 posted on 04/01/2015 12:07:59 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

They had a court order. That’s all a warrant really is.


17 posted on 04/01/2015 12:24:42 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Amazing that a judge can just take away someone’s constitutional rights with nothing more than a stroke of a pen - no due process at all.


18 posted on 04/01/2015 12:29:45 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Tell him to call Larry Klaymore or someone like him. Or move to another state and buy a new gun.


19 posted on 04/01/2015 12:29:49 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: envisio
Never tell a representative of the state (police included) how many firearms you have. EVER. Foremostly it ain’t none of there dang business.

Better yet, tell no one. Amazing how information is disseminated.

20 posted on 04/01/2015 12:32:50 PM PDT by jim-x (9/11/2001 - Never forget, Never forgive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson