Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamacare Enrollment Split: Subsidies vs. No Subsidies
Wall Street Journal ^ | March 30, 2015 | By CHRIS JACOBS

Posted on 03/30/2015 3:48:38 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Two reports released in the past week demonstrate a potential bifurcation in state insurance exchanges: The insurance marketplaces appear to be attracting a disproportionate share of low-income individuals who qualify for generous federal subsidies, while middle- and higher-income filers have generally eschewed the exchanges.

The overall picture presented is one of a bifurcated, or even trifurcated, system of health insurance. Individuals who qualify for very rich insurance subsidies or Medicaid have signed up for coverage, while those who qualify for small or no subsidies have not. It raises two obvious questions: Whether and how the exchanges can succeed long-term with an enrollment profile heavily weighted towards subsidy-eligible individuals—and whether an insurance market segregated by income was what Obamacare’s creators originally had in mind.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0carenightmare; boehnercare; failure; obamacare; obamacareenrollment; obamacaresubsidies; socialism

1 posted on 03/30/2015 3:48:38 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Two reports released in the past week demonstrate a potential bifurcation in state insurance exchanges: The insurance marketplaces appear to be attracting a disproportionate share of low-income individuals who qualify for generous federal subsidies, while middle- and higher-income filers have generally eschewed the exchanges. “

Bwwwaaaaahhhhaahha! You don’t say!

Why is it every conservative could see the outcome, while the libs always seem confused and dazed about the unintended outcome of their idiotic policies?


2 posted on 03/30/2015 3:55:56 PM PDT by Hardens Hollow (Couldn't find Galt's Gulch, so created our own Harden's Hollow to quit paying the fascist beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Couldn’t care less.

Got a better idea - lets split the atom right over Obamacare and NUKE it to oblivion.


3 posted on 03/30/2015 3:59:08 PM PDT by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardens Hollow

The left is just building another constituency.


4 posted on 03/30/2015 3:59:26 PM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

you mean it has been an epic fail as a wealth redistribution policy?


5 posted on 03/30/2015 3:59:46 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardens Hollow

But everyone has known that from the beginning.


6 posted on 03/30/2015 4:01:11 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

7 posted on 03/30/2015 4:08:50 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

8 posted on 03/30/2015 4:09:04 PM PDT by PROCON (Always Give 100% --- Unless you're donating blood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh2
Whether and how the exchanges can succeed long-term with an enrollment profile heavily weighted towards subsidy-eligible individuals—and whether an insurance market segregated by income was what Obamacare’s creators originally had in mind.

It was EXACTLY what they had in mind- mandated wealth redistribution.

9 posted on 03/30/2015 5:26:14 PM PDT by randita (Obama entrusted the transformation of the best healthcare system in the world to a scam artist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Individuals who qualify for very rich insurance subsidies or Medicaid have signed up for coverage, while those who qualify for small or no subsidies have not.

I'm sure they're puzzled over this unexpected bit of news.

10 posted on 03/30/2015 5:30:27 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh2

It has been a resounding success in the wealth distribution aspect. No one but the people getting subsidies is signing up. That’s wealth redistribution from the taxpayers to the Feds to the insurance companies.


11 posted on 03/30/2015 6:47:19 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Those not receiving subsidies are being made to pay MORE to pay for the subsidies.


12 posted on 03/30/2015 6:48:49 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

” The insurance marketplaces appear to be attracting a disproportionate share of low-income individuals who qualify for generous federal subsidies, while middle- and higher-income filers have generally eschewed the exchanges.”

When did anyone (even supporters of Obamacare) ever predict otherwise? The exchanges are intended to attract were previously uninsured and those who do not have health insurance offered through their employer. Of course those groups are skewed toward lower income filers.


13 posted on 03/30/2015 7:19:31 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson