Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Angelina Jolie has ovaries, fallopian tubes removed to cut cancer risk
CNN ^ | 3/24 | Laura SMith Spark

Posted on 03/24/2015 8:21:02 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue

Two years after she underwent a double mastectomy to cut her cancer risk, actress and U.N. envoy Angelina Jolie has had surgery to remove her ovaries and fallopian tubes for the same reason, she wrote in The New York Times on Tuesday.

Jolie, 39, carries a mutation of the BRCA1 gene, which sharply increases her risk of developing breast cancer and ovarian cancer. Her mother was diagnosed with the latter at age 49 and died seven years later.

In her New York Times op-ed Tuesday, Jolie said she had been planning the latest preventive surgery for some time.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chat; jolie; ovariancancer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last
To: TangledUpInBlue

I htoguht she did this years ago? Or did she have her breasts removed to cut risk of breast cancer?


121 posted on 03/24/2015 10:53:49 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

She will end up dead at some point in time.


122 posted on 03/24/2015 11:18:46 AM PDT by MadMitch (nemo me impune lacessit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

She is still nuts


123 posted on 03/24/2015 11:21:17 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

It’s her life and it’s her money. I have absolutely no issue with this.


124 posted on 03/24/2015 11:36:17 AM PDT by Gator113 (Cruz, Lee, and Sessions speak for me.... most anyone else is just noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat

That is pure fembot hype

Not grounded in fact

It’s the global warming hoax of women’s health

Foisted by lesbians with little need of female hormones to start with

They actually pushed the notion of heart attacks even more

A very political study

I’ll explain if u want


125 posted on 03/24/2015 1:32:18 PM PDT by wardaddy (Dems hate western civilization and GOP are cowards...We are headed to a dark place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

I cannot think of a thing to add to your post—I agree wholeheartedly.

Back in the day, I remember the late Betty Ford being just excoriated for mentioning (in media) she had breast cancer. It was something that just wasn’t talked about in public. How many MILLLIONS of women lives have now been saved due to Mrs Ford doing the initial heavy lifting?

Awareness is every thing. Kudos to AJ for speaking out.


126 posted on 03/24/2015 1:43:20 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom ( Just because you are paranoid, it doesn't mean they aren't out to get you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
Or did she have her breasts removed to cut risk of breast cancer?

***********************

Correct.

127 posted on 03/24/2015 1:48:27 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Its a numbers game. 40% of women with her mutation will get ovarian cancer while 70%+ will get breast cancer. She did the smart thing.


128 posted on 03/24/2015 1:53:16 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I truly respect her statement and going public. No doubt that her openness will save lives.


129 posted on 03/24/2015 1:53:56 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom ( Just because you are paranoid, it doesn't mean they aren't out to get you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

When the wind blows she must whistle like an empty coke bottle.


130 posted on 03/24/2015 6:27:55 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Not deniable = Not falsifiable = Not science = Not even wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Angelina Jolie is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

She’s just doing her brainwashed part to carry out the agendas of our elite nwo friends.

My aunt was a 30+ year breast cancer survivor.

The primary “treatments” prescribed by new world order’s bloodthirsty medical industry are the same medieval treatments available when she was first diagnosed; radiation and “chemotherapy”.

NWO is having fun for over a century now playing with the poisons of radiation and “chemotherapy” as a “medicine”, while they make sure that their medical research industry turns up no significant information about how do do anything silly like find root causes and actual real, healthy solutions to them.


131 posted on 03/24/2015 6:47:54 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue; AllAmericanGirl44; Armen Hareyan; B4Ranch; Balata; Ban Draoi Marbh Draoi; ...
CANCER WARRIORS PING

This is a ping list for cancer survivors and caregivers to share information. If you would like your name added to or removed from this ping list, please tell us in the comments section at this link (click here). (For the most updated list of names, click on the same link and go to the last comment.)

132 posted on 03/24/2015 11:08:08 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue; struggle; SMARTY; Darksheare; Gaffer; Mercat; dfwgator; happyhomemaker; ...
Women have been doing this for years, long before Jolie did this. It's a very common surgery. They just don't talk about it because they're not in the spotlight...

If their families have a history of cancer at a young age, the insurance company will pay for genetics testing. If a woman tests positive for BRCA1 or BRCA2, she's considered high risk for ovarian cancer, too, and the insurance company will pay for preventive surgery to remove the ovaries.

Believe me, she didn't make this decision lightly. An oophorectomy can be a quick surgery with an easy recovery, but the ovaries offer many benefits, such as protecting against heart disease. To remove them is a big decision.

But ovarian cancer is very sneaky, hard to catch at an early stage, and that's why some women have this surgery.

COUNTrecount posted a link to Jolie's whole story, by the way. After reading it, you all should understand why she made this decision:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/24/opinion/angelina-jolie-pitt-diary-of-a-surgery.html?_r=1

133 posted on 03/25/2015 12:22:30 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes

You missed my point,,,,


134 posted on 03/25/2015 1:41:02 AM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes

I had BRAC 1 and 2 tests, last time. I was negative for those. Then I had a panel of tests (21 of them, I think) and was negative for all of them. Mine isn’t genetic, although of my mom’s 11 sibs and her, 9 had cancer! Most survived, two died (smokers both) Of 36 cousins, I’m maybe the 5th. Two have died, one lost her leg, one is fine, and me.


135 posted on 03/25/2015 4:58:32 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (The Sting of a Reproach is the Truth of it. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes; CatherineofAragon; Twink

She mutilated as a child

Tattooed up later

Removed her boobs

Now her internal lady parts

She’s one weird agent chick and btw

According to my wife OB who is our social acquaintance

Voluntary total hysterectomies are rare and most docs won’t do them and would instead opt for annual contrast dye MRI or CAT scans or if near a top notch joint one can take the receptors pill test before CAT which attach to abnormal cell growth

She’s gonna die regardless one day

But under 40 years old to voluntarily give up your internal lady parts is damned nutty and with real consequence

Thus says my 50 year old in menopause hunny bunny who takes HRT btw and is damned glad to have them

Question

Let’s say I wardaddy have chance of testicular cancer

Do you think I’m giving up my testicles preemptively So I won’t die maybe or maybe not

Hell I’d rather die

She’s a rubber sheets chick that Angie


136 posted on 03/25/2015 7:51:14 AM PDT by wardaddy (Dems hate western civilization and GOP are cowards...We are headed to a dark place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
I don't know how you got my name on your ping list, but remove it. Thank you
137 posted on 03/25/2015 8:53:06 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
You are not on my ping list.

That was only one post to around 20 people (I guess you were one of them) on this thread alone. I didn't want to make 20 posts explaining the same thing.

138 posted on 03/25/2015 9:55:50 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
She sure had issues in the past, and I'm really not a fan. But... you're wrong about some things....

According to my wife OB who is our social acquaintance Voluntary total hysterectomies are rare and most docs won’t do them

Jolie didn't have a total hysterectomy. She had an oophorectomy. And she had that done only after a doctor told her she might have an early form of cancer.

If your OB friend isn't aware that doctors encourage women with a certain genetic mutation to have prophylactic oophorectomies, then maybe that's because she's an OB and not a gynecological oncologist.

Btw, I had one nightmarish year of pure hell a few years ago, and that's the only reason that I know anything about any of this.

Thus says my 50 year old in menopause hunny bunny who takes HRT btw and is damned glad to have them

I'm 50, too. Since you're an up front, tell-it-like-you-see-it kind of guy, I'm going to be straightforward, too: Tell your lovely wife to stop the HRT. Certain cancers feed on estrogen. HRT can lead to cancer. <<< Click on that link for more info.

Now people are going to be angry with me, but I had to let you know.

Do you think I’m giving up my testicles preemptively

I can't believe I'm having this conversation. But... you wouldn't have to do that... because testicular cancer has been curable for the past 30 years.

And now I hope you and everyone else here will never have to know about any of these things. I hope you'll never have to sit before a doctor who says those three words - "You have..." well, you know.

139 posted on 03/25/2015 10:58:08 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

“I wish she would reconcile with her father ...”

IIRC, they have reconciled and he has a relationship with her and her children.


140 posted on 03/25/2015 11:06:52 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson