[slouper]

Gee, I wonder where they got the plans for that?

[taildragger]

and fuel efficient turbofan engines allow cruise missiles to be lighter and cheaper than their ballistic counterparts.

Oh $h!t. They have a small TF, think low TSFC ='s range, not good...

[skinkinthegrass]

..and the 'Toons, were paid how much from ChiComms?
what ever the amount, The 'Toons were paid very cheaply.

[Vendome]

Drank yoo Brill Krinton...

[Mike Darancette]

Remember that laser that destroyed the truck a couple of days ago?

[Monty22002]

We used to have GLCM with W80 warheads. Too bad we gave all that up to ‘appease’ the Russians.

[blueunicorn6]

Those filthy Chinese. They’re always hanging around on Main Street wearing an overcoat.

“Hey Baby! Wanna see my cruise missile?”

Like anybody would want to see their small little cruise missiles.

[Kenny Bunk]

This missile is reported to have a 4,000KM + range.

I believe it, but where are the fuel tanks in such a slim, 25' airframe? If these small turbojets are so small and get such great mileage economy, why can't we have them for civilian aircraft?

[SgtHooper]

Using US parts, no doubt, while we use Chinese parts in ours.

[Dagnabitt]

Looks like Chinese weapon designers are getting their money’s worth from their U.S. engineering degrees.

[Spktyr]

Ping.

Our cruise missiles: Designed in the 1970s.
Their cruise missiles: Based on the canceled successor to our 1970s missiles.

But hey, we’re always going to win no matter what, right?

[StoneWall Brigade]

Ping