I;ts about time people stood up to the federal over reach activist judges and got the 10th amendment and religious freedom back
they maybe not be smiling when their taxes go up (”marriage tax”)
Christian Science is neither.
“I now pronounce Olanda and Dinah are married spouses”
Something is queer about this equation and even the justice of the peace knows it is lunacy to say “I now pronounce you wife and wife.”
Onion headline?
Nice try.
Sorry, but I’m on the Alabama judge side.
FU, Supremes.
FU until the chickens come home.
FU until Obama reveals his records.
FU until Bubba is arrested for his rapes.
The same play over and over.
The Left equates any rules with race discrimination and declares any behavior a civil right.
Discrimination is legal. The only illegal discrimination is that which our society is deemed wrong and enshrined it in our Constitution.
The queers are not the moral equivalent of black people. No black person can change his race. But a queer can stop behaving the way he does, and should. So there is no right to legal protection for that behavior.
So the notion that prohibiting queers from hijacking the language and institutions in an effort to destroy them is the same as segregation is absurd.
Ah... always bringing up slavery and racism in order to advance the leftist agenda.
Like clockwork.
No, it channels Moses.
SOoooooo, after gay marriage is forced on Alabama, marriage will be in as good of condition as Alabama’s public schools?
I realize that’s provocative, but it’s an illustration of how the Road to Hell is often paved. Wallace was bad for opposing desegregation. His opponents, the supporters of desegregation, were good for supporting it. So far, so good. Those are probably perfectly reasonable moral judgments. The public schools have gone into the toilet since desegregation. Good intentions don’t always deliver their promised results.
Imagine the outcome when the stated goal is immoral on its face. Desegregation and rights for all people was at least a noble goal; is gay marriage even that? I’m sure most who support it do so because of “fairness” and “equality” and so forth. Others undoubtedly do so as a means of attacking our culture and institutions. Liberals can hate Wallace all they want (while sending their children to exclusive, private schools), but they never have to look at the results of their Utopian schemes.
MM, (I) We could sure use some George Wallace about now.
I think most everyone misses the point about “gay marriage.”
1. Official Washington is a massive collection of lawyers.
2. Lawyers are always looking for ways to increase their bottom line.
3. “Gay marriage” is a bonanza for the legal crowd, from divorce lawyers to estate lawyers and everyone in between.
4. Always follow the money.
Seems to the be calling card of the liberals this time to compare Roy Moore to George Wallace. Yet they refuse to mention one word about old George being a democrat and supporting him at the time.
Quick send the troops to Alabama to escort the gays to the Courthouse.
Please pray for Judge Roy Moore!
He’s taking the stand we support.....and he’s not afraid, but he will be tested.
Believe it or not there was a time when the CSM was a decent publication.