Posted on 02/01/2015 10:49:28 AM PST by expat_panama
On the left is the excerpt --from the expert linked in Real Clear Markets: A Darkening Market Sky - Anthony Mirhaydari, The Fiscal Times
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This piece originally caught my eye because it made some sense: seems to me like the investment markets are not going anywhere. While metals are failing to climb from their bases the major stock indexes sank below their 50-day moving averages and IBD keeps calling it 'market under pressure' as the distribution days pile up. So Mirhaydari's take satisfied my need for a daily dose of doom'n'gloom. OK, lets think about this. Maybe someone can help me but what I'm getting here is that that the world's in turmoil, the economy's underachieving, and stock valuations are bearish. At first glance it's convincing and then I try and think of when was the last time the world was not in turmoil or when was the economy ever overachieving? We're down to stock valuations. The writer hangs his hat on "S&P 500 earnings per share growth expectations" and in this wonderful info-age we can check it out for ourselves. This site has the historical numbers and a look at the past and yeah, EPS's are in fact stalling like they did back in the dot.com days and in mid '08. Looking harder I'm also seeing that failing 'growth expectations' really don't help much as a predictor of worse investment returns in the future. I'm looking all the way back to 1870 and instead of seeing a harbinger of destruction, I'm seeing business as usual. Got to love how we got all the facts here and the facts on stock valuations usually go to both earnings and dividends, and the way they relate to over all market stock prices. Our friends at NYU got a site where we can download S&P500 earnings'n'dividend stats back to 1960 and imho there's food for thought. Then again, I would have proffered some magic indicator proving with all certainty that the market's going up or the market's going down. It don't work that way. Maybe we're back to seeing Mirhaydari as being right after all. Maybe not w/ the doom'n'gloom shtick, but with the idea that it's good advice to "embrace a more defensive posture including long bets on volatility". Or as IBD calls it, we got a yellow light that means 'proceed with caution'. Then again, I can't remember ever wanting to invest in any other manner...
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|
One thing after another ping.
Finance thread: Is anyone worried about the “SuperBowl Indicator”, which predict a down (deflated) market for the year if the Pats win? As a Pats fan, I’m putting on my shorts.
Bump to read later.
“As a Pats fan, Im putting on my shorts.”
I’m glad for that. We don’t need to see you with out your shorts on. ;^)
Indeed you don't, ahem. It's a market term...
I didn’t know that, but I’m already rooting for the Seahawks.
This s/b good for stocks:
President Barack Obamas budget will propose an ambitious six-year, $478 billion public works program of highway, bridge and transit upgrades, half of it financed with a one-time mandatory tax on profits that U.S. companies have amassed overseas, White House officials said.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3252993/posts
I thought maybe someone was short sheeted!
HAPPY GROUNDHOG'S DAY!!! It either means that today's gloomy futures (stocks -0.04% and metals -0.50%) will foretell the trading for weeks ahead, or it means that we're stuck in a never ending repeat of reversals to previous levels like we had in January. What is different today however is that this morning's reports are beginning on the first day of the week/month:
Personal Income
Personal Spending
PCE Prices - Core
ISM Index
Construction Spending
--and there's also this:
The Problem With Obama’s Plan to Limit Retirement Savings
The administration’s plan to cap retirement saving at around $3 million adds a new layer of complication and little benefit
by Allison Schrager
8:15 AM CST
February 2, 2015
I didn’t know he is planning on capping the retirement savings again. Labor unions, especially gov’t ones, push this because most of them have defined benefit plans in which their distributions can add up to that much, and it certainly isn’t “fair” that taxpayers can have better retirement than they do.
Good grief! He’s raising taxes on savers on top raising taxes on folks that build businesses.
Hadn’t watched professional football in years but watched the game last night mainly for the commercials. Was pulling for the Seahawks the first half then switched to backing the Patriots in the third quarter after watching their performance, think Edelman won me over. Turned out to be a good game.
Just found this Edelman jpg. lol
RBA cuts rates. AUD plummets.
Why is the Fed going to raise again?
Hiya & a great morning to you! So we ended up yesterday (as usual) w/ our last minute reversals in spite of the pre-market futures gloom. None of that goom today as futures traders are seeing metals again up +1.48% and stock indexes up +0.34%. Reports coming later today are just Factory Orders, Auto Sales and Truck Sales.
Sooo much happening in the news but at least the latest econ thread list can still fit here:
Please help me out here on just where the Fed as announced raising rates. All I'm getting from the FOMC is that
"...if incoming information indicates faster progress toward the Committees employment and inflation objectives than the Committee now expects, then increases in the target range for the federal funds rate are likely to occur sooner..."
--and don't forget that the sun will nova in a few billion years too. Back on planet earth, inflation yesterday (PCE Prices - Core) was zero. As expected. Like the previous month.
Plenty of them (Fed governors) talking about when they are going to raise this year. Bullard yesterday as an example.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.