Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge strikes down gay-marriage ban in Alabama
AP ^ | Jan 23, 2015 9:59 PM (ET) | KIM CHANDLER

Posted on 01/23/2015 8:13:42 PM PST by DJ MacWoW

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — Alabama became the latest state to see its ban on gay marriage fall to a federal court ruling Friday, as the issue of same-sex marriage heads to the U.S. Supreme Court.

U.S. District Callie V.S. Granade ruled in favor of two Mobile women who sued to challenge Alabama's refusal to recognize their 2008 marriage performed in California. The ruling is the latest in a string of wins for advocates of marriage rights. Judges have also struck down bans in several other Southern states, including the Carolinas, Florida, Mississippi and Virginia. The U.S. Supreme Court announced this month that it will take up the issue of whether gay couples have a fundamental right to marry and if states can ban such unions.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: 3rdthread; homosexualagenda; lawsuit; ruling; searchalabama; sweethome
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
By what right?!

" Each State, in ratifying the Constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act. In this relation, then, the new Constitution will, if established, be a FEDERAL, and not a NATIONAL constitution."
James Madison Federalist No. 39, January 1788

1 posted on 01/23/2015 8:13:42 PM PST by DJ MacWoW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

There is no right of government to redefine marriage against the will of the people.


2 posted on 01/23/2015 8:15:03 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Seriously?


3 posted on 01/23/2015 8:18:07 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (When the hell do I get MY white privilege? I'm tired of busting my @$$ for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

They polished them up and put make up on them for the court case.

4 posted on 01/23/2015 8:18:59 PM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Yes.


5 posted on 01/23/2015 8:19:37 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

We could save billions by eliminating legislators and the Congress, etc.

Judges are quicker and cheaper, evidently.


6 posted on 01/23/2015 8:20:26 PM PST by ansel12 (Civilization, Crusade against the Mohammedan Death Cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

Apparently that’s an old pic. The article says they have an 8 yr old son “together”. Physically impossible.


7 posted on 01/23/2015 8:21:39 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Unfortunately that’s true. And the will of the people is of no account in this brave new world.


8 posted on 01/23/2015 8:23:05 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

It’s becoming more and apparent that states should start the process of succession if this judicial tyranny continues.


9 posted on 01/23/2015 8:25:40 PM PST by hdbc (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hdbc

The states allowed a monster to grow as did the people.


10 posted on 01/23/2015 8:28:05 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
" Each State, in ratifying the Constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act. In this relation, then, the new Constitution will, if established, be a FEDERAL, and not a NATIONAL constitution."

James Madison Federalist No. 39, January 1788

That was before the Civil War and Reconstruction.

11 posted on 01/23/2015 8:31:57 PM PST by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

And? It was written by the creator of the Constitution. I believe that his opinion oand vision trumps Lincoln’s.


12 posted on 01/23/2015 8:34:21 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Left Wing Loonie must be the main qualification to be a judge these days.


13 posted on 01/23/2015 8:36:20 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Sure looks that way. Of course, the left also “judge shops”.


14 posted on 01/23/2015 8:37:23 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Just keep re-enacting it. Marriage is not a Federal matter.


15 posted on 01/23/2015 8:52:20 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I’m referring to the Fourteenth Amendment. State sovereignty has never been the same since then. We just observed the anniversary of one such example.


16 posted on 01/23/2015 8:52:34 PM PST by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

“I believe that his opinion and vision trumps Lincoln’s”

The states supporting Lincoln’s vision funded a more powerful army than the states supporting the Madison vision.

He who has the gold, or the more powerful army, makes the rules.

In today’s America there isn’t one state willing to oppose the national authority and reclaim its sovereignty. Apparently Madison’s vision is dead.


17 posted on 01/23/2015 9:49:50 PM PST by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

In matters of power, whether temporal or eternal, it is best to commend all to the Creator, who will most perfectly exercise his prerogatives amidst mortals. Though outward appearances may addend otherwise, the enemy is “pwned.”


18 posted on 01/23/2015 10:12:16 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I’m waiting for gun rights activists to use this same strategy to make states recognize concealled carry licenses from other states.


19 posted on 01/23/2015 11:00:10 PM PST by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hdbc
Perhaps, but first let's use the peaceful means bequeathed by our framers in Article V.

It's time to recognize the horrible mistake of the 17th Amendment and be rid of it.

History will not look well upon a people who gaffed off their responsibility and quietly submitted to tyranny.

20 posted on 01/24/2015 1:44:38 AM PST by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson